Pros And Cons Of Political Polarization

Improved Essays
Current day America has become more politically divided than ever before. Politics are becoming more polarized meaning the left wing liberals are moving more towards the left while the right wing conservatives are moving further towards the right. This means that both sides are moving away from the middle of liberal and conservative which would be moderate. As a result of politics deviating from the middle or moderate, politics becomes more difficult because both sides cannot meet a consensus about certain issues causing America itself becomes more divided. Political polarization is a result of growing partisan antipathy, ideological consistency, and political engagement or activism. Growing partisan antipathy is a party’s negative attitude towards the opposing party. Greater numbers of both parties have extremely negative views of the opposing party and state that the opposing party’s policies are a threat to the nation. “In both …show more content…
In order to lessen political polarization more people with moderate ideals will have to participate in elections. People will also have become more educated in the dangers of political polarization. Some people believe that changing primaries to a more inclusive system of voting will encourage more moderate thinkers to vote in elections. Reihan Salam believes that getting rid of single-member districts and implementing more multi-member districts so that more than one representative can be elected to office will lessen polarization. He states that “ Under single-member, winner-take-all systems, he will never be represented by a Republican. But if five New York City districts merged into one in order to elect five representatives, a Republican could plausibly get elected to represent the 20% or so Republicans who occupy New York City.” Using this plan across the country may lessen the effects of political polarization but there is no absolute way to bring an end to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The second type of the election method is partisan elections. In these elections, candidates are listed on a ballot and are voted on in a primary election. Then, following the primary candidates listed on a ballot in a general election. However, unlike nonpartisan elections, partisan elections include the party affiliation for those running (“Judicial Selection: The Process of Choosing Judges”, 2008, p. 6). Just as appointment had certain benefits and negatives, likewise, so does election.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Partisan Sort Summary

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This change in behavior has a bevy of consequences, such as, more political participation due to a heightened interest in politics, which is a result of a newfound partisanship. Another consequence is a shift of focus from swing votes onto a campaign’s targeted base. Despite these changes Levendusky does not find a substantial correlation between the increase in sorting and polarization and uses data gathered from the NES to back up his conclusion. In this conclusion, he finds that sorting can; increase the probability that an individual will vote for their party’s candidate, like their party more, and bring their stances on issues more in line with the views of their…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parties in charge of redistricting will attempt to pack opposing voters into very few districts. In cracking, however, opposing voters are spread out among several…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Congressional approval ratings have proven to be dependent upon the partisan lens in which the public views their legislative decisions. The public tends to have higher approval ratings when Congress approves legislation that aligns with their political views and lower approval ratings when congress approves legislation that does not. However, in “How Partisan Conflict in Congress Affects Public Opinion: Strategies, Outcomes, and Issue Differences” Flynn and Harbridge examine how approval ratings are affected when congressional decisions result in legislative gridlock. They find that when compared to partisan conflict resulting in partisan wins, loses, or and gridlock, the latter results in the least public approval.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, political trends seem to repeat themselves, especially when it comes to political parties. A common political trend in the U.S. is a concept known as divided government, in which one party controls the White House and the other controls Congress. It happens almost every election, and is occurring now, with Obama, a Democrat, in office, and the majority party in Congress being the Republicans. Along those same lines, a previous trend is reoccurring once again. “Radical Republicans” are starting to pop up within Congress, similar to what occurred in the 1960s.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What if I told you that American politics polar opposites date all the way back to the beginning of our countries creation in the 1700's; from todays Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders to the 1790's Thomas Jefferson vs. Alexander Hamilton. In the 1790's George Washington was president. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were members of Washington's cabinet. During that time these men had many opposing views and very few similarities. One of the reasons why people then and now, especially Hamilton and Jefferson, disagree is because of their views/political affiliation.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, while many Republicans disagree on Obama’s new health law, the Democrats represent a vast majority of people who had no health insurance. In addition, unlike the Democrats, the Republicans are hesitant to raise minimum wage because they do not represent low-income workers and families living in poverty. Nonetheless, having a divided government can benefit the democracy of the United States. The House majority by Republicans can prevent the Democratic president from going extremely “left”. The term “Tyranny of the Majority” can be used to describe our democracy if the country had both the President and the House from the same party.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The political parties have been part of the United States government for as long as anyone can remember, but the question is: should they be? There are multiple perspectives on this, one being that political parties benefit the system, another being that political parties are the problem. As a country, it’s not often considered that we could be doing something wrong --especially in government -- but it’s time to open our minds and consider it. Long before many can actually remember, George Washington came into office and founded the very democracy that still stands today.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voters are presented with political information in a well manner. Sudden shifts in political trends are discouraged in two-party systems. As a diverse nation, the United States allows citizens to express their own opinions. This encourages political participation. Since many parties share power, it encourages the government's insecurity and instability.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Critique of Fiorina’s “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics” In the early 1980s, political scientists were studying the changing status of American political parties (Fiorina 1981). During this time, Morris P. Fiorina wrote his essay to address these findings, most notably what he believes to be the decline of political parties. Fiorina concludes that strong political parties provide electoral accountability and discipline in government and keep the system afloat. Without it, the consequences are dire.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican and Democratic parties are prime examples of political division amidst a time of necessary unity. Difference in opinion regarding the…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the 60s to the 80s, the political landscape was completely realigned as the political parties themselves started to change their own platforms. This made the loyal voters which state along those party lines to changes their political party. This forced states and counties that normally would go red to go blue and vice versa. The political realignment of this time period is what has led to the modern associations with the Republican and Democratic parties. The main source which allowed for the political realignment was the rise of independent voters as this allowed the breaking of loyal voters and political bonds which lead to a reforming of these two parties into the modern ideology associated with the two major political parties.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Redistricting is the political process of drawing United States electoral district boundaries, intended by the Framers to keep the electoral scales of democracy balanced. Instead, the process, as according to the Center for Voting and Democracy, “encourages the manipulation of our elections by allowing incumbent politicians to help partisan allies, hurt political enemies", and flips democracy on its head by allowing these politicians to choose their voters before the voters choose them. The article and the video adhere to the idea that redistricting allows for one political party to maintain political dominance and further political goals by drawing boundaries that protect incumbents and avoid demographic realities, rather than ensuring equal voting power and representation. However, incumbents are not always ensured a win.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So much so to the point that some conservatives will not associate with liberals and vise versa due to their extreme views. “In some ways, this data indicates a decline in the power of the two major political parties in the United States.” I also believe that this is due to not wanting to come together as two separate parties and be open-minded to other ideas. As a result, we are just going backward in history than forward. Another consequence of the division we have is less political participation because of the inability to communicate and come to a mutual agreement.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays