Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

Improved Essays
29 year old Brittany Maynard will end her life, legally, with the help of physician assisted suicide. The practice of PAS is immoral, in the process, it can affect not only the family but have psychological effects on the assisting physician. Opposing argumentors state that this practice is nothing but dignified and honorable, that this procedure is the only logical solution to a suffering victim. PAS (physician assisted suicide) is a drug administered by an assisting physician in effort to bring the patient a painless death. Throughout all of this, one question remains; is the practice of PAS really worth the cost? One can assess the value of this by contemplating the psychological effects PAS has on the physician himself. As a result of potential psychological effects, one should avoid choosing the PAS course.

Physician assisted suicide has mistakenly been made an option to Americans over the years. Excluding the early termination of a life, this procedure holds a slew of inevitable negative effects on assisting parties. The most evident effect PAS boasts is afterwards, the immediate family might suffer from depression or other emotional issues. Another consequence that PAS encompasses is the psychological effects affecting the physician involved. Physician
…show more content…
Moreover, these contend it’s the patient’s free will to choose to continue on their path of pain or end their lives. However, the real act of villainy is taking a being’s life before the genuine conclusion has transpired. Equally, burdening a physician with the emotional stress is malevolent. Adding to the idea, PAS hasn’t always been an option to Americans, it’s only recently that it has become a possible option. Suddenly, humanity has come to the conclusion, with this option at hand, it’s all of the sudden adequate to select your last desired day of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    PAS opponents believe that it is morally unacceptable for a physician to assist in ending a person’s life because it a moral profession and allowing a person to request that the physician make the decision to end someone’s life isn’t morally right. However, the Oregon law makes it very clear that the only role that a physician is to determine whether the person has a terminal disease and if the person is competent which are both medical judgements and does not require the physician to make any moral judgements. Then the physician is to assist the person with the decision that they have made themselves and how best to cope with this decision. Opponents also argue that as long as a physician is knowingly involved in the process which involves suicide that it violates the medical duty to promote health. However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diane’s Story Physician assisted suicide has been a topic of debate in our generation today, and will continue in years to come. It is the act of a physician aiding a patient in intentionally ending their life as means to end suffering. PAS is currently illegal in all 50 states; however, many physicians feel they have an obligation to their patients to relieve pain in order to advocate dignity in their dying moments. Dr. Timothy Quill was one of several physicians who supported PAS when it came to the care of his patient Diane. Diane was a 45-year-old female, diagnosed with acute myelomonocytic leukemia who was being treated by Dr. Timothy Quill.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article looks at all arguments made for and against PAS when it comes to a psychologist helping a patient with the decision and how people have a chance to die with dignity. The beginning of “The Role of and Challenge for Psychologist in Physician Assisted Suicide”, gives a brief history of PAS and which states currently deem it legal like Oregon, Washington and Montana. Along with the history of PAS comes the pros and cons of assisted suicide, according to Johnson, Cramer, Conroy, & Gardner (2014) some of the pros included, “individuals have the right to oversee their own goals and destinies, which…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Typically the individual seeking PAS has a painful terminal illness and is the one to perform the “last act”. Both the physician and patient are aware and comprehend that the patient intends to use the medication or intervention method to commit suicide. PAS and euthanasia are commonly misperceived as interchangeable entities. Euthanasia is an inclusive term which describes the medical process of a sickly patient ending his/her life, rather than the continuation of suffering until an inevitable death. The main discrepancy is that Euthanasia involves the physician intentionally ending the life of his or her patient.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide which is also known as PAS has been a topic that has been highly debated for years, it gives patients in critical medical conditions the right to end their lives. Many people think that PAS and euthanasia are the same, while both actions include medications in lethal doses, Physician Assisted Suicide is when a doctor makes a patient’s death less difficult by providing him or her with a lethal dose of medication such as barbiturates or a combination of medications to allow the life ending act or to refrain the patient from receiving treatments that are used to prolong a terminally ill patients life. The physician lends the knowledge but the person does the act. While, euthanasia is when someone actually administers the medication to the patient to fulfill…

    • 2173 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So her and her husband had to move from California to Oregon and switch their lives around just so she could get PAS (Maynard). She was already sick enough and she shouldn’t have had to switch her life around right before she died but she did because it was not legal where she lived. So she got everything approved to be able to use PAS and she was able to let her family know when she was going to do it and prepare them for it (Maynard). Brittany died in peace like she wanted to and did not have to suffer any longer and that’s why people argue that PAS should be available to all terminally ill patients who wishes for it. People have the right to life or death so if a doctor is willing then no law should step in the way (Bowden…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Physician-assisted suicide, under various names and colloquial definitions, has been a documented ethical issue for centuries – not to mention an undocumented ethical issue since the hypothetical dawn of life. By common understanding, physician-assisted suicide is death either directly or indirectly permitted or carried out by a physician. In simple terms, an “out” is provided. For this reason, it is often associated with chronic pain or terminal illness. Suicide where the doctor in charge is directly involved is perhaps the first situation which comes to mind when one thinks of euthanasia.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS, J. David Velleman argues that a PAS policy could be harmful to patients and thus, we should not have a policy. In his work, “Against the Right to Die”, Velleman is not arguing for the morality of PAS, but rather against a PAS public policy. His argument focuses on the harm on a patient that PAS can have by adding the burden to opt for PAS. By giving more options, a PAS policy can push a patient to choose death. Without the option of PAS, Velleman says, a patient can continue to live by default.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician assisted suicides are perceived as inhumane by the perception of some; however, these tactics are wanted by the governing body of the terminally ill and sufferers of intense pain. Patients receiving terminal care are typically uncomfortable and very fatigued. There isn’t, for the most part, a break in agony. Physician assisted suicide should be legalized because it gives terminally ill patients a chance to say their goodbyes and pass with dignity, protects both doctors and dying patients, and improves their quality of life. hi no…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide is one of the most controversial ethics topics in society today. Many believe that physician assisted suicide should be legalized across the U.S because of the positive impact it could have on those with terminal illness who want to avoid prolonged suffering in hospice care. Suicide with a medical professionals assistance is also justifiable as a person 's right because it in no way affects or endangers another person 's rights. If physician assisted suicide is legal for those who are mentally competent it could relieve pain for not only the person but their loved ones. On the other hand, it becomes debatable when taken into terms of religious and moral beliefs, many disagree with those who believe that it…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone in the world will experience the subject of death at some point their lives. The common wishes in regards to this subject are to die a peaceful death, surrounded by loved ones, with no suffering. A practice that would allow terminally ill patients to have this wish granted is the practice of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide, or PAS, is an action in which a physician provides a terminally ill patient with the means to end his or her own life. Most people want to be in control of their own end-of-life decisions.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most importantly, physicians are a part of this decision, which makes this topic a huge concern because it goes against a physician’s integrity, which is why a plethora of ethical concerns arise from physician-assisted suicide. The principle of non-maleficence and the theory of deontology demonstrates why physician-assisted suicide is unethical in the medical world. First, the principle non-maleficence states to avoid all harm. The principle understands that it might be impossible to avoid all harm, but the action taken must at least be good. Secondly, deontologists believe it goes against a doctor’s duty to assist in a patient’s suicide.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability to die is inherited by all people at the moment of conception but the legal right to die is a topic most concerning in today’s politics. Andrew D. Sumner, a graduate a Penn State’s College of Medicine in 1990, proposes that individuals should not have the legal right to end their life due to terminal illness or ailment. Approximately 1.2% of American citizens die every year from some form of terminal illness(Guy, Maytal, and Theodore A. Stern 6). Many of those deaths involve excruciating pain from the illness itself and family members suffering over an hourglass that just won 't seem to run out. Denying people the right to chose when they want to pass on their own terms is simply cruel and unjust, not only to the patient, but to the loved ones of the individual.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays