Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

Improved Essays
Affirmative action is necessary because everyone deserves to go to college regardless of racial background. It is also important to have affirmative action because it promotes diversity in schools. In March of 2008, ACLU stated that they were in for approval of affirmative action. “These programs recognize and strive to correct the barriers that continue to block the paths of many individual Americans, including women, Native Americans, Arab Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and African Americans. Affirmative action helps ensure equal access to opportunities and brings our nation close to the ideal of giving everyone a fair chance. We support and other race-and-gender-conscious-policies as vital tools in the struggle to provide all Americans with equal opportunity, to promote diversity in …show more content…
‘’ programs that leap-frog less qualified minorities over more-qualified non-minorities sweep those systemic problems under the carpet. As such, race-based programs perpetuate fraud upon the very groups they are designed to help.” There’s also more to the disadvantages of affirmative action such as how Dana White has stated in her 2003 article titled “Who says I’m inferior?” “Thirty years ago, affirmative action may have been a necessary step to open the doors of American universities and companies. It helped correct a history of racial discrimination propagated by whites, but it’s a new day in America...” Other organizations such as NOW have stood up putting affirmative action as a policy. “Affirmative action levels the playing field so people of color and all women have the chance to compete in education and in business… Despite the enormous gains made by the civil rights movements, women and people color still face unfair obstacles in business and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes we are all a little bias so it may be harder for some to see fault in the way they do things. I believe that affirmative action shines a light on the issues we had in the past and helps to remain on the right path. We must also remember not to cross the line when dealing with affirmative action plans. The main key is that the individual hired must be qualified for the position and the effects of the plan must not cause a long-term disadvantage to another…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, it is certain that affirmative action has benefited a group of people more than others. Initially, affirmative action was meant for federal contractors. Although, they were supposed to employee people without regards to their race, color, or national origin, studies have shown “that affirmative action helps white woman” (Nittle) more than women or men of color. In the Supreme Court case of Abigail Fisher versus the University of Texas, ironically, she is the type of person affirmative action benefits the most. But the ban of affirmative action has not always been a disadvantage for all minorities.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative action was originally intended for families who were victimized from slavery and Jim Crow laws in the South. College admissions advisor no longer base their affirmative action givens on the Jim Crow laws which ended in 1965. They base their givens now on race and ethnicity and which being the minority comes into place. However, the process of affirmative action in higher education has been given to people whom families were not discriminated against by society and can damn near pay for college.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative Action is one of the last policies standing in the way of what the great Civil Rights activists fought for. Blacks then did not want to be treated better. They wanted to be treated like a White person, like equals. Whites do not receive the benefits of Affirmative Action. Whites are not granted “the equivalent of hundreds of SAT points” Martin Luther King Jr. stated that an “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Does Affirmative Action Do What It Should?” an interesting alternate perspective concerning affirmative action is presented. In the article, Dan Slater starts off by describing affirmative action. They are a set of policies used by universities across the nation as a means to recruit minority students whose predecessors have been subject to racial discrimination within the United States. These practices have been put into place to “even-out” the overwhelmingly off-balance number of white-success-stories to minority-success-stories ratio.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Schools are not searching for people who will have a good job and be able to have a life after college. The Michigan Law School continues to accept minorities with poor LSAT scores so that the “class looks right, even if it does not perform right” (Clarence). Not only that, Affirmative Action is patronizing minorities. Meaning that they have a lower standard than whites as if they are unable of producing the same quality of work. Also, this patronization of minorities leads to businesses being brought down because of Affirmative Action (Affirmative Action).…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action was signed by President John F. Kennedy it was first put into play on March 6, 1961 it called to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without concern to their race, creed, color, or national origin. Forward to 2016 where it has become a problem within college applications where colleges are now more focused on having a diverse student body rather than the quality of the student themselves. While some colleges believe that affirmative action is helping minorities it can seem condescending applying that minorities cannot achieve their objectives with their abilities or hard work. This implied meaning is similar to the belief that slaveholders argued that slavery was a ‘positive good’ that civilized blacks and raised them in every dimension of life. The arguments for affirmative action and slavery similar in the both argue that it helps to bring out potential in…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Affirmative Action When discussing affirmative action we must first define what the term means. Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary defines affirmative action as “the practice of improving the educational and job opportunities of members of groups that have not been treated fairly in the past because of their race, sex, etc.” (Merriam-webster). As the definition states, these policies apply to both educational and employment situations and are designed to level the playing field, and make up for past unfairness, but are not supposed to create preferential treatment of one group over another. “Affirmative action goes beyond not discriminating among employees… employers take proactive steps to help reverse the impact of discrimination against…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Action Affirmative Action first began in 1961 on March 6 from The Executive Order 10925 signed by President John F. Kennedy. In 1964, the Civil Rights Act made discrimination illegal for employment regarding to race, cultural background, color, or religion. Over the course of time, this began to become beneficial to a lot of people especially if they wanted a job because of discrimination and enforced diversity and giving minorities opportunities or chances. Even though this is such a positive that’s helping people who has a disadvantage, they are some cons. The other side of the argument believe that affirmative action put race as the dominant factor in hiring or admissions to colleges/universities.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opponents of Affirmative Action perceive the term as unconstitutional because white individuals that have long sought for well-deserved opportunities by demonstrating they are worthy and have sufficient qualifications have been discredited. From an opponent’s point of view, there is no need for affirmative action because it has been years since minorities have been discriminated against. Moreover, it is time for society to move on and stop trying to compensate for racial subordination around the 1960’s (Hernandez, 2015). Not to mention, it demeans minorities in a sense that the idea of them getting the position/admission would be impossible if it weren’t for affirmative action. For instance, a white male and Hispanic male compete over a position at a prestigious law firm, and the Hispanic ends up getting the position.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action, by definition, is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. Using varying instruments and policies, Affirmative Action aims to help underrepresented groups have a better job opportunities or college admissions. Generations of people have been disadvantaged by institutionalized discrimination and one way to remedy this is to place a policy that evens out the playing field. There has been numerous legal cases against affirmative action concerning college admissions, and a few have made it as far as the Supreme Court including Bakke v. Regents, Univ. of California (1978), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), Parents Involved v. Seattle School District (2007), and most recently Fisher v. University of Texas (2013 & 2016).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Affirmative Action: An Implication of Inferiority or a Source of Opportunity? Shelby Steele, a Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, begins his work, “Affirmative Action: The Price of Preference,” by explaining that affirmative action policies create a preference for individuals of color and intend to replace the historical exclusion and discrimination that has hurt them. This intention seems like a good-willed and appropriate form of compensation on the part of white individuals and a great achievement of power on the part of black individuals. However, Steele provides several key points to argue otherwise. The main purpose of my paper is to explain these key points of Steele’s argument against affirmative action and…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Action Affirmative action has been a highly controversial issue in America since its creation. The policy that was put in place to make up for the poor treatment of racial minorities quickly became reverse discrimination: encouraging the professional and academic worlds to make decisions about a person based on their race which is, by definition, racism. The policy now serves as an offense to both sides – giving a race-based advantage to minorities against majorities and considering said race minorities to be innately disadvantaged. Affirmative action is a policy that puts a stigma on minority groups and ironically implies that a minority status is disadvantageous. College admissions should discontinue their use of affirmative…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action policies allow for equal opportunity and throughout history have helped end discrimination in the workforce as well as many different type of organizations. Minorities are given the opportunity to compete for job opportunities and admissions to educational institutions. However, not everyone agrees with these types of policies and believe that this is a form of “reverse discrimination” against white individuals (1). These individuals argue that minorities that include people of color and women are given preference and although the qualifications may be the same amongst all, the minorities will be granted the opportunity simply because of their skin color or gender. In “Affirmative Action and Fairness” Robert Fullinwider discusses how affirmative action is viewed differently…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another argument against affirmative action is that setting a simple standard for a category of people may be setting them up for disappointment in the future. A final argument about this policy is that it does the most for the people that need it the least; this policy does not do much for the African American underclass. I find that disagreeing with the policy is more convincing because giving people a “one up” because they are a minority would technically being biased towards others that aren’t that minority. Also, I think the supporting argument about affirmative action being compensation for all that was taken form minorities absurd. We, at least the age I live in, did not take anything from my fellow Native American…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays