Prison Brutality

Improved Essays
The basic purpose of this experiment was to see if the brutality reported among guards in prison was because of the situation and roles they were given or if it had to do more with their type of personality, and to see if prisoners lacked respect for law and order because of the situation they were in with the guards or if it had to do with personality as well.
Mr. Zimbardo and his team chose a few men who answered to the newspaper AD and had them answer a questionnaire about their family background, physical and mental health history and all the study subjects were considered to be normal healthy men. By the toss of a coin flip they were then given roles to be prisoners and guards. If they did not act aggressive that would confirm that it
…show more content…
Mr. Zimbardo failed to see that the experiment had gone too far. They had already seen how quickly the guards fell into their roles and how it was affecting the prisoners but yet he wanted to keep going. Second They allowed the guards to harass these prisoners so badly by taking away certain privileges like the bucket they were given to use the restroom in and making the prisoners do physical work or be put in ‘the hole’ if they did not want to cooperate. Third would be that in a way they did deceit the prisoners parents when they went to visit. Mr. Zimbardo was afraid that the parents would see the harsh environment they had the prisoners living in and would want to take their sons back home so he had the guards clean up the prisoners and the cells and give them big meals before the parents went to visit. All three of these violations can relate to the Belmont Reports Ethical Standards, the principle of beneficence and the principle of justice on the Belmont Report are being violated by all three of the ethical violations I mentioned. Principle of beneficence mentions to ‘have the best interest of subjects in mind’ and to ‘maximize benefits and minimize harm’ the first two violations I mentioned are negligence and harassment which violates these two principles in the way that neglecting does not have the best interest for the subjects and harassing can cause harm to the subjects in the experiment. Lastly the principle of respect for persons was violated as well by not protecting the autonomy of the prisoners and not being truthful with the prisoners

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo wanted to see how quickly the guards would adapt to their role as actual prison guards and assert their authority and dominance on the prisoners. He saw that they adapted too quickly; they developed the “authoritarian personality” (pg. 231). The prison guards tormented the prisoners so much that Zimbardo had to end the experiment after one week instead of…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine you are a student at Stanford University in the 1970s, and you hear that a psychologist is offering $15 per day to take part in his experiment. You figure that you could use the extra cash and figure that it’s a good way to help out. You and 20 other students are accepted to participate, and you are split into two groups, prisoners and guards. The only instructions given were “...do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners. No physical violence [is] permitted.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (2008, p.282) contended that the Zimbardo experiment emphasize that it is the situation in which people find themselves and not their personal trait that largely determine their behaviour. They added that Zimbardo (2007 as cited in Baron et al. 2008, p.282) suggested that it is the tendency to yield to situational pressures, including conformity pressures that is responsible for much of the evil behaviour exhibited by the prison guards in the experiment and that people readily conform to the social role which they are expected to play, especially if they are stereotyped roles like those of prison…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe they experience more unethical issues than Milgram’s. The prisoners wasn’t protected from psychological harm. If it’s just an experiment, why should people become emotionally distressed and humiliated? One prisoner had to be released after one day because of a mental breakdown. Also, Zimbardo wasn’t aware of other things that was going on.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second issue: Disregard of privacy On the day before the experiment would start, randomly assigned guards would arrive at the basement to help set up and pick uniforms, whereas the selected inmates were told to rest at home. What they were not informed of was that they would be arrested by the city police at their home and run through the entire extensive booking procedure. This was a severe disregard of personal privacy and may have been very traumatizing to some volunteers, due to them being in shock.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Finally, the environment was crafted to be brutal. The guards and prisoners may have reacted differently in a less brutal environment. "BBC study in December, 2001, two psychologists, Stephen Reicher and Alexander Haslam, tried to find out. They worked with the documentaries unit of the BBC to partially recreate Zimbardo ’s setup over the course of an eight-day experiment….Soon, more prisoners began to challenge the guards.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stanford Experiment for this case the focus will be on guards and their inhuman behavior toward prisoners. Guards had Philip Zimbardi as their authority and the responsible one. In the beginning of the experiment they were respectful towards prisoners but later thing went out of control. They started humiliating the prisoners and act inhuman towards them because they didn’t felt guilty , In fact they had lots of fun doing such things as they didn’t thought it is their fault to act like that but the ones giving them orders.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even when they said they didn’t want to be part of it anymore , Zimbardo did not remove them immediately and actually sent them back into the experiment to give them a second thought which allowed for more damage/persuasion by the guards. Finally, they set very inadequate limits on what the guards were not allowed to do that basically amounted to no physical abuse. Still, they cross that line a few times especially when they used the fire extinguishers to get the inmates out of their…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The highly unethical nature of this experiment is quite apparent, in the film and in the actual experiment itself. Starting with deception, it was evident since the start of the study when the participants were made unaware of their random assignment and led to believe that their roles were based on their nature. Demand characteristics were briefly seen when the experimenter told the guards that they expected them to show their authority and discipline the prisoners Furthermore, there is somewhat lack of informed consent.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If I was Zimbardo, I would have firstly set up some sort of guidelines for the guards. Rules against physical and mental abuse would be set into place to combat the breaking of Standard 3.04. With rules set into place preventing harm, the major amounts of stress and sadness exerted on the prisoners would have been avoided. This would have prevented emotional breakdowns that occurred to many prisoners in the real experiment. Another change I would make, would be towards my role as the sociologist.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the guards won’t let the prisoners tell their parents that they are being tortured and beaten. The guards had the prisoners write letters to their parents but they never shipped the letters out so none of the letters got to their parents. The guards got so mean and rude to the prisoners that they started to have mental breakdowns because they started to I believe that they were in prison. This caused The Stanford Prison Experiment to end after 6 days instead of lasting 2 weeks. This experiment affected the prisoners so much that those prisoners had to get a therapist to help them with their problem.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays