Stanford Prison Experiment Ethical Violations

Great Essays
The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). One of the most distinct ethical code violations in this study was Standard 3.04 in the American Psychological Association's list of principles. The standard …show more content…
The issue with this study is that its results were completely not what the researchers expected. They did not go into the study knowing that normal, college students would turn into fiendish monsters who would cause extreme amounts of stress onto other students. If they were aware of it, I am sure they would not have implemented that much torture just for a study. They would be aware of the consequences and controversy that would surface. Another reason why I think this is not completely intentional is because Zimbardo, himself, was caught up in the mess. He not only played the role of a sociologist, but also a warden. He got caught up into his role, like the experimentees, and could not fully understand the extent of his wrongdoings (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Despite these observations, there is no proper explanations to why Zimbardo did not stop the experiment once he saw the first mental breakdown, or when he first saw the perpetuated abuse. Him, being a professional, should have known that he was breaking major rules of ethics by the results of his experiment. He should have put a stop to it, and thought about it from an ethical perspective. Unlike the poor experimentees, he was able to serve two roles. He should have put his role as an ethical sociologist first, rather than his role as a warden. Additionally, sources show that Zimbardo encouraged abuse (Lurgio, 2015, …show more content…
If I was Zimbardo, I would have firstly set up some sort of guidelines for the guards. Rules against physical and mental abuse would be set into place to combat the breaking of Standard 3.04. With rules set into place preventing harm, the major amounts of stress and sadness exerted on the prisoners would have been avoided. This would have prevented emotional breakdowns that occurred to many prisoners in the real experiment. Another change I would make, would be towards my role as the sociologist. I would only serve the role of a sociologist/psychologist, and avoid any sort of conflicts of interest. I would have a third person party serve as the warden while I just watched from the outside. The distance and detachment from the experiment would give me a more proper mental state to see what was going on. I would be able to stay away from bias, and see the experiment from a more logical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On August 14th 1971, Philip Zimbardo got 24 healthy male students together and started the Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment was held in Jordan Hall, which is Stanford University’s psychological building. The study was about observing the students’ psychological behavior as they were playing a role as a prisoner or a prison guard. Out of the 24, there were 12 prisoners and 12 guards (6 of which were alternatives), and they were all payed $15 everyday to be apart of all this for 7-14 days. Zimbardo himself took part in this experiment as a superintendent.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What happens when good people are put in an evil place? What about when innocent individuals are systematically punished and humiliated? Is human identity rooted in one 's situation? A 1971 endeavor, now known as Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment, attempted to explore these questions and others.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How does having power corrupt people? Having power can corrupt people in manys, such as what happen in The Well by Ira Sher and what happen in The Stanford Prison Experiment by Saul McLeod. In the article The Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip Zimbardo had constructed an experiment to confirm what might cause a guard to have brutality against a prisoner and that’s just what Zimbardo had done. In the article it says, “Within hours of beginning the experiment some guards began to harass prisoners”.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Philip Zimbardo created an experiment that was both unique and started others. The Stanford Prison Experiment examined how ordinary people would react when placed in positions of power. He chose twenty-four students who were healthy, stable, and they abided by the law. Each subjects would be either a guard or a prisoner for two-week…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment is unethical and inhuman. It is also evidently a product of poor decision-making. If the scholar involved had considered using two individuals to take the roles of primary experimenter and prison superintendent, the experiment would not have advanced to the levels it did. Moreover, this independent individual would have interfered with the direction the experiment was taking.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Experiment ethical or un-ethical, why and what was the purpose, what was learned and what did the Stanford Experiment contribute in the scientific community of studying human behavior? To understand and answer these questions one must start with the beginning, the very genesis of what is one of the most ground breaking experiments in my own perspective opinion. The Stanford Prison Experiment which was conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues. This was a pioneer experiment which push the limits to the exploration to human behavior.…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Phillip Zimbardo’s prison experiment was quite different compared to Milgram’s. However, the aim seemed to be similar. Both experiments intended to examine just how far a person will go, knowing the welfare of another person is at risk, whether it be physical or emotional. Zimbardo’s experiment consisted of a transformed basement at…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment which tested the behaviors of both prisoners and guards in a simulated prison created by him and his colleagues at Stanford University. In the article written by Dr. Zimbardo, Pathology of Imprisonment, he discusses the process of the experiment and his findings. To begin, Dr. Zimbardo gathered a group of 24 male student volunteers. All of the students that participated in the study received compensation of $15 per day. Each student was evaluated emotionally and mentally to determine their stability, and if they were able to participate.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo on this experiment were indecisive on how they think the experiment should but ran. They obviously thought Dr. Zimbardo’s methods were becoming excessive yet they were hesitant to say so out of fear of challenging Zimbardo’s authority. The sociocultural perspective of this situation was that they refused to overstep their boundaries due to the societal understandings that we have towards authoritative figures. It is seen as a sign of disrespect in our society, especially during that time period, to challenge those who have power: parents, teachers, bosses, officers, etc. Virtually anyone who is seen to hold some level of authority over us.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison experiment took place in 1971. The following experiment was a study of psychological effects to conform the roles of a guard and prisoners within a prison like environment. The experiment was designed to last two weeks, but the ruthlessness of the guards and the misery of the prisoners was so penetrating it had to be dismissed after 6 days. Despite the Stanford experiment study pass an ethics committee it still resulted in multiple ethical violations. The idea was to turn the psychology building into a prison, utilized college students half were prisoners, half were bailiffs, jailers become more abusive.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Participants in the experiment were not aware of the true nature of the study. Participants were told that the study was based upon punishment in relation to learning, and not obedience in relation to an authority figure. According to the Video, Stanley Milgram deceived participants of the true objectives of the study with the goal of minimizing their bias in the experiment (Video). Stanley Milgram deceiving the participants can be completely justified. He knew that the study would turn out to be successful if the subjects knew less about the true intentions of the experiment.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays