Obedience To Authority In The Film: The Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
This topic is analyzed as it greatly fit within the movie concept. It will explain how it correlates with move The Stanford Prison experiment, another similar examples and comparison with Milgram Experiment.
To start analyzing obedience to authority it is good to give first example of relation between cooks and the chef. The location is in the kitchen where cooks are preparing food and chef gave them an order to put big amount of salt in the dishes. Cooks are aware that that amount of salt will ruin the food and make their customer dissatisfied. Now, the cook is in dilemma whether he should do it or not. If he decides not to put the salt he is confronting the Chef who has authority over him and power to fire him. In the other hand if the cook decides to obey his Chefs order he is confronting his conscious and professionalism. This was a first example that roughly explains the concept of obedience to authority.
Another example is Milgram Experiment which was made by one of the most influential social Psychologists Stanley Miligram in 1961. Just before the trial for Nazi Germany criminal Adolf Eichman. Stanley Milgram created the experiment in order to answer the popular question at that time, and even today, how the Nazis could kill all those people in Holocaust and Auschwitz by obeying someone orders? The
…show more content…
In Stanford Experiment for this case the focus will be on guards and their inhuman behavior toward prisoners. Guards had Philip Zimbardi as their authority and the responsible one. In the beginning of the experiment they were respectful towards prisoners but later thing went out of control. They started humiliating the prisoners and act inhuman towards them because they didn’t felt guilty , In fact they had lots of fun doing such things as they didn’t thought it is their fault to act like that but the ones giving them orders. (Haslam and Reicher,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For obedience, the experimenter would take up more of an authoritarian figure, where the subject felt that he had to comply with the authoritarian personality. The subject already…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine you are a student at Stanford University in the 1970s, and you hear that a psychologist is offering $15 per day to take part in his experiment. You figure that you could use the extra cash and figure that it’s a good way to help out. You and 20 other students are accepted to participate, and you are split into two groups, prisoners and guards. The only instructions given were “...do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners. No physical violence [is] permitted.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WHY WAS STANFORD’S PRISON EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED? In order to study psychological effects of prison life a experiment was conducted called “Stanford Prison Experiment”. The psychologists wanted to study what were the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this experiment, a team of researchers led by the famous psychology professor named, “Philip Zimbardo” finally decided to set up a replicated prison so that they can carefully note effects of the behavior of all those within the walls of prison.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues within the Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford prison experiment was a controversial experiment in human behavior conducted at Stanford University in 1971. The experiment took twenty-four voluntary students and placed them in the role of either prison guard or prisoner, in a make shift prison that was constructed in the basement of the psychology department of Stanford University. The experiment was to last fourteen days but was terminated after six days due to the negative psychological impact on the participants (Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo (1973).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We also see the situation aspect of the authority of hierarchy being affected when uniforms are put in place. Guards were purposefully given reflective sunglasses in order to separate them from the prisoners and make them appear to be less human. Prisoners were no longer able to create a connection with their eyes. This disconnect between authority and the inferior subjects of the experiment gave authority more power and weekend willpower. The Asch conformity experiment is a clear example of how peers affect human actions.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many scientists such as Stanley Milgram, Erich Fromm, Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett have tested their theory of obedience to authority. Their findings might frighten people on how obedient people are and what the sick and twisted things people will do. An example of obedience to authority is the writing of this paper for Doctor Campbell, if not done properly with obedience the grade of the student will plummet. Another example of people listening to orders given by an authoritarian person that inflicted pain, suffering, and even death is the Holocaust; the Holocaust was set up by Adolf Hitler and Nazi officers in concentration camps. The Nazi officers were told to run these concentration camps filled with innocent people and to exterminate…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Source A McLeod, Saul. Stanford Prison experiment. SimplyPsychology, 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2016.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the guards won’t let the prisoners tell their parents that they are being tortured and beaten. The guards had the prisoners write letters to their parents but they never shipped the letters out so none of the letters got to their parents. The guards got so mean and rude to the prisoners that they started to have mental breakdowns because they started to I believe that they were in prison. This caused The Stanford Prison Experiment to end after 6 days instead of lasting 2 weeks. This experiment affected the prisoners so much that those prisoners had to get a therapist to help them with their problem.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deception plays a key and controversial role in the ethics of psychological research. In psychology, deception occurs either when information is withheld from participants (omission) or when participants are intentionally misinformed about an aspect of the research (commission). This essay will explore whether participants in psychological experiments should ever be deceived regarding the true nature of the experiment. This will be analysed by discussing the arguments for and against deception using some controversial case studies in research. Non deceptive methods of research do not always allow researchers to explore true findings.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays