Government surveillance, an infringement on our rights, or a necessity to our safety? Within these articles explanations and evidence are given to support why surveillance is a necessity. “In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance” by J.S. Taylor lends understanding, limit to the surveillance of people's lives and a new era for government protection. Moreover “French National Assembly Clears Bill to Expand Government Surveillance” giving reason to protection from terrorism. The surveillance of the government.
J.S. Taylor’s “In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance” gives proof that surveillance does not have to be an inconvenience. This association is very well explained through an excerpt of “In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Government Surveillance”, “it is morally …show more content…
Within their text, for example, “Courts frequently dismiss challenges to such programs for lack of standing, under the theory that mere surveillance creates no harms.”(Richmond) there is evidence that government surveillance is not at all to protect the public. The excerpt also demonstrates that the government has hidden from the very people they say they spy on to protect before. At the same time the article illuminates the dangers of government enforced surveillance programs. Inferring from the cited text, “Courts frequently dismiss challenges” (Richmond), the authority does not stand with the public. Nobody protecting from a, very, plausible government corruption operation. Additionally, it is derived that no authority is, or will be, helping on legal matters, leaving a neglected public. The concept of a surveilling government is not to be without its consequences and Neil M. Richards is warning
J.S. Taylor’s “In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance” gives proof that surveillance does not have to be an inconvenience. This association is very well explained through an excerpt of “In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Government Surveillance”, “it is morally …show more content…
Within their text, for example, “Courts frequently dismiss challenges to such programs for lack of standing, under the theory that mere surveillance creates no harms.”(Richmond) there is evidence that government surveillance is not at all to protect the public. The excerpt also demonstrates that the government has hidden from the very people they say they spy on to protect before. At the same time the article illuminates the dangers of government enforced surveillance programs. Inferring from the cited text, “Courts frequently dismiss challenges” (Richmond), the authority does not stand with the public. Nobody protecting from a, very, plausible government corruption operation. Additionally, it is derived that no authority is, or will be, helping on legal matters, leaving a neglected public. The concept of a surveilling government is not to be without its consequences and Neil M. Richards is warning