Power And Violence In Somalia

Improved Essays
Power and violence are two things that groups or people in the country like to get their hands on and have total control over it. One might ask if this could create chaos in the country and who should have the rights to them? Fortunately in most of the countries, only the "state" is allowed to these rights and privileges. What is a state? A state is an organization which holds the monopolistic rule of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory (Weber 1918). No one can contest or use these privileges unless they are allowed by the state itself (Weber 1918). A state is not something that just appears out of nowhere, it is something that needs to be formed. There are four major steps involved in forming a state. War making which …show more content…
Somalia a country which once had a government and proper control over its land and territory is now known as a failed state. It was officially no longer recognized as a state in 1995 when the international community such as the United Nations peacekeepers left the country (Maas 2001). The reason for that is people besides the government have control over the country and use force or violence to implement their rule. Basically, anyone who has a group of followers use violence to terrorize and threaten by forcing people to obey their rules and commands. An example would be of the city of Somalia known as Mogadishu. The city no longer has a government since 1991 when the president Mohammed Siad Barre was overthrown and the country was in a civil war (Mass 2001). The city was now run by warlords who continue to fight others and asked businessmen like Sheikh to pay them money for their own protection against them (Mass 2001). Eventually, him and the other businessmen and entrepreneurs got fed up by their rule and decided to have their own militia (Mass 2001). They hired some people for the safe running of their telecom company and to protect other people, which eventually broke down the hold and power of these warlords in the city (Mass 2001). This is a prime example of a country which is not a state. It does not follow the steps which Tilly argues form a state. It lacks all the steps which qualify a …show more content…
Baghran which is totally under the Taliban rule where they perform as a government rather than an insurgent force (Goldstein and Shah 2015). The most important part of becoming a state is waging wars. The Taliban did this by fighting against the US government which was present at the time in Afghanistan but is no longer there. This has caused a conflict between America and the Taliban. Taliban in the past has used force to neutralize their enemies inside Baghran. The men are thrown into jails if they shave their beards and they have random turban checks if anyone has a fancy haircut underneath (Goldstein and Shah 2015). They make sure that there is no freedom or rights for the women and they are not allowed to travel or have an education (Goldstein and Shah 2015). Besides that, they wage wars into other parts of Afghanistan as well to expand their rules and have successfully managed to neutralize the Afghan government in 4 out of 400 districts (Goldstein and Shah 2015). They continue to spread throughout and people fear them. They have control over what people do in their daily lives and how much freedom they should be granted. Some people like the way how they rule because they think they are carrying out rules which support the Islamic rule. They want the mission to be carried out and the Taliban being the controllers of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Waco Conflict

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Afghan people might felt that act as their insult, disrespect, and threat against the religion. In addition, these conflicts have similarities in ideology, religion, and belief too. People have different beliefs that they want to achieve through different means, and ways, but the government officials might think, they could harm or violate the social norms and harmony. Lack…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This absence of any visible authority or police presence within Somalia created an environment conducive to the numerous warlords competing for power in the various neighbourhoods. As a result, the warlords took control of Somalia and imposed their own brand of law and…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Legislation Paper

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “In the absence of a specific federal law or constitutional provision, each state is…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power in the eyes of many people is a form of a weapon that is used to produce a negative and unsafe environment for citizens. Most of the time power has a negative effect on society due to the fear and corruption it brings to the table for the leader. The way a lot of people use their power is to show strength and courage over one another and that's what leads to corruption and consequences to society. Power can sometimes be a good and helpful but most of the time it's not due to the people that have the power. Power is a tool not a weapon and people use it as a weapon more than anything.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is the first word that comes to my mind when I think of The Handmaid’s Tale. This whole story is based off the power of the government and what they did to Gilead. They wanted women to stay “safe” and protected. When given power, even the nicest of people with take advantage of it because everyone likes to feel like they’re in control of something.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Militant Peacemaker

    • 1117 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History Will Not Absolve the Militant Peacemaker History has shown that the quest for power is absolute. Many have used any and every excuse they can in order to obtain it. Those that are hungry for power will use all forms of manipulation necessary in order to obtain it; even the cloak of peace. They say that in order to create a peaceful environment, they must burn it down. They say that in order to create peace they must first kill anyone in their way.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FEDERALISM versus STATES ' RIGHTS These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning federalism and states ' rights. This is an important debate for U.S. citizens since this directly affects our way of life. The two positions argue whether or not the idea of states ' rights is relevant today. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration; for example, evidence indicates that states should have the right to decide certain issues for themselves.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Bates explores the connection between politics and economic ways of transformation in his book “Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development”. According to Bates political structure and economics of transformation is equal to the study of prosperity and violence, hence the name. Bates claims that for states to advance from a poor agrarian state to a wealthy industrialized society, they must go through what is called the “great transformation”. While all wealthy states had to go through the great transformation in the past to achieve the success they currently obtain today, many states still struggle to break out of an agrarian state in today’s society despite various attempts to do so. The great transformation process…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blood and Iron: Production from Destruction Bryce K. Richards The idea that a nation can be ruled through violence and war is one that is, at first, frowned upon but in regards to leadership it can be seen as quite effective. Otto Von Bismarck introduced his version of this method of governing during his speech justifying the increase in military spending in Prussia September 29 of 1862. He mentioned the phrase for which he was remembered in that he stated that a nation is better run “not through speeches and majority decisions…but by iron and blood” [1]. This basically implied that he was supporting the increase of military spending as a result of him viewing using them in war and to fight as an essential component of a frugally expanding nation. He ruled in a fashion that prioritized in the utilization of military force rather than that of passing laws and voting.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ability of a government to suppress and control internal agitation while at the same time appearing gentile and appeasing is a hallmark of a strong government. The middle ground between not budging to demands, and giving too much and collapsing, is a very difficult line to walk. Far too often the national government steps in, and because they need to appear strong and in control, they squash the uprising and the results are often much more violent and destructive than they would have been if negotiations could have taken place prior to the events spiraling out of control. This difficult balancing act that a government must maintain often falls apart and blows up in their face or results in a very harsh response from the oppressed peoples…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It all began by when the soviet union sent troops to try and invade Afghanistan. The troops went in and killed one of the leaders, who were then switched by the Mujahedeen. The new regime would never stay quiet and would never leave a country to invade and kill a leader. They decided they needed to take action, and so they did. They sent an army to go to war and fought for their country and attempted to kick the Soviets’ out of their country.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Somalia is consistently seen as a failed state, undeniably it could be argued that it is the classic case as Liberia, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). As Messner (2013) argues, “it is also indubitable that the plan to build and sustain a modern state, with internal and external sovereignty as its defining characteristics has failed in Somalia.” However, Robert W. Cox (2209) adds, “many works in political science dealing with Somalia are written from a ‘problem-solving perspective’ rather than analytical or critical.”…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism are all three important theories in the world of International Relations and while there are many differences between the three perspectives, there is still one main similarity. Realism and Liberalism are well-known theories, while Constructivism happens to fall into the category of alternative views. Anarchy is a condition of International Relations that requires states to rely on their own power(Shiraev and Zubok.41). Each theory provides strong arguments as to how much cooperation is possible under anarchy, but in my honest opinion, I believe that Liberalism is the theory that provides the strongest argument as to how cooperation is possible under anarchy.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Power is an important tool for interaction among individuals and establishing authority in many aspects of life. Power is evident everywhere in the world. Bosses and their subordinates, teachers and peers and also government and its citizens. They are all expected to follow their dominant's rules. Power can be seen as "The ability to influence or outright control the behaviour of people" (Power (social and political)/Wikipedia).…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A country cannot prevail in a disorderly world without the use of power. As stated in the Merriam Webster Dictionary, power is defined as the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. People usually get power confused with force, which is the specific application of military might. Any country that wishes to survive in this world needs some power to ensure that survival. Many things are involved with power including but not limited to military, economic, political, cultural, and psychological factors.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays