Political Corruption In The United States

Improved Essays
In the United states most elected leaders get their position due to powerful corporate companies. An example of corporate power is when the railroads created the time zone system in order to better time their train departures and arrivals. so if a powerful company can control the way we keep time they can control a politician. So I believe that there should be a cap on political campaigns because it would help keep corruption in check, help the economy and other politicians would have a chance at winning.

Political corruption has ruined all of the greatest empires and it will do the same to the United states. An example of corruption is in the ancient Roman empire. The Roman empire's l leader was Caesar who truly cared for rome and it’s people. Unfortunately other political leaders did not like his policies so they assassinated him. Then shortly after the Roman empire divided and eventually fell due to the greedy. This relates to political campaign spending because the greedy corporations would want to see laws helping their corporation all while funding the political leader to see it through. So if a company could only give a certain amount they would not have as much sway with that politician. This would rid most of the
…show more content…
With less leverage over a politician he would be able to put forth reforms that would benefit society not just one corporation. The millions of dollars that could be spent on a company's workforce instead of a politician's campaign would boost our economy by 10 fold. As well, if a young man’s dream can be heard just as loud as superstar’s dream they could be elected and follow through with a full heart. In the end, this can only happen if we can limit political campaign spending. So should the corruption, greed, and popularity take over the country or should it be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Six Myths about Campaign Money”, Eliza Newlin Carney argues that there are six myths regarding money’s real role in politics, each with a hint of truth. Newlin argues that it is a myth that corporate money will now overwhelm elections because neither unions nor corporations will put vast new resources into campaigns because they could spend their money on politics, through issue advertising with limited constraints, before the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which ruled that unions and corporations could spend money from their vast treasuries on campaigns. Carney proceeds to argue that the argument that the Citizens United ruling will not affect the campaign finance system is also a myth, because the Court’s decision sets legal precedents which threaten other long-standing aspects of campaign finance and sets a narrow definition of corruption regarding campaign finance, jeopardizing the constitutionality of…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Super Prc Pros And Cons

    • 1622 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this quote the author is stating that the money the Super PACs give to the candidate can have an influence on the candidate that leads to corruption not just in the election but it can become a much larger problem. The large problem is violating political equality, corruption in office and…

    • 1622 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film Bulworth follows the campaign of a senator that is running for elections in the State of California. As soon as the film starts we are introduced to the high level of corruption that occurs in a political campaign or as politicians refer to it as simply campaign. By the end of the movie it is clear that the film portrays current American politics. The film makes interesting references to how race, gender and class matter when it comes to our political system. However it is also very clear to see that this film is trying to portray the problems that come with the corporatization of politics.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The result of this is a lack of separation between the two, while in reality, the interests that a corporation has are far different than those of the individual. It is assumed that small donations from a person to a campaign will overall not affect the races as a…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All these advertisements cost money for the Politician to have them up, and this money is provided by the corporations. These corporations have lobbyists who give gifts to the politicians so that the corporations can try to sway the ideas that the politician has (How corporations influence the government?). The lobbyists try to get the politicians to make decisions that will benefit the corporation instead of the people (How corporations influence the government?). After the corporations provide money to the campaigns of the politicians the corporations have more access to the politicians than the public does, and often the corporate is able to make their ideas heard while the people never even get a real chance to have a say in what happens (How corporations influence the government?). The ideas being planted in the heads of all these politicians also helps with the corruption of the…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “The New Price of American Politics”, James Bennet looks at the views of both scholar Jim Bopp Jr. and former FEC Commissioner Trevor Potter. Bopp favors more money and larger donations in campaign politics, and argues that corporations, billionaires, and outside groups should not be prevented from embracing their freedom of speech when it comes to campaigning. He believes that fewer, bigger donations may eventually allow for politicians to spend more time with voters. Bopp fights to knock down laws and regulations which keep money from entering politics, and believes that the campaign finance system shuts out some groups from expressing their support financially for candidates. Meanwhile, Potter, one of the leading lawyers behind…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (1). As it concerns influencing elections, do you believe that Interest Groups or Political Parties are more influential? Political parties and interest groups play important roles in our government. Both of these groups are organized groups of people working toward specific goals and both promote politicians and raise money to accomplish those goals. I believe that interest groups has more of an impact in inflecting elections.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political corruption is always brought up during election season and seemingly everyone has their own fix. Corruption today can be quickly discovered if one just follows the trail of dark money. Funds given to a politician from a corporation, whether in a campaign or as lobbying, is referred to as dark money by liberal politicians. Citizens United V. FEC was a supreme court case which ruled that money is speech and thus corporations can give endless sums of money to politicians under their constitutional protection of free speech. Liberal politicians often call these funds dark money because the funds are used to promote corporate interest, not the interest of the people.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Election campaigns for public office are expensive. Candidates need funding for support staff, advertising, traveling, and public appearances. Unless they are independently wealthy, most must finance their campaigns with contributions from individuals and from businesses and other organizations (legal).” In 1974, most of these campaigns were funded by individual corporations or small groups of wealthy donors. In 1972, insurance executive W. Clement Stone contributed approximately $2.8 million directly into Richard M. Nixon’s re-election campaign.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campaign contributions should be limited. If someone has more money it is not fair for the other ones who have less money. Everyone should work around the same budget and come up with winning with the same amount of money. If someone has more money and they plan on giving more stuff to a community or creating something if they win they have a larger possibility of winning because they would be giving something back to a community. If they have the same budget they can not do that.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It seems that the public is always hearing of powerful people who make hypocritical and scandalous choices: from the local police officer who takes advantage of his position by parking on the wrong side of the street in a non-emergency situation, to former Senate majority leader and President Barack Obama’s former nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Daschle who evaded taxes for a car and driver, to former Illinois Governor Blagojevich who was impeached for trying to auction Obama’s senate seat. These examples lead others and myself in the public to a single yet complex question: Why do people in positions of status, especially representatives of the law, take liberty with the law and their actions as they do? Perhaps their choices…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Koch uses the power he gains from his wealth to support candidates he agrees with; however, the majority of people think he is trying to buy the American government. Koch uses his money to protect and strengthen Koch Industries, but he has never admitted this publicly. Koch is not the first to act in this way; other CEOs, as well as politicians, like to say one thing in public while they do the exact opposite behind the curtain. While it is impossible to be completely rid of corruption, something must be done about Koch and others like him. It is important to think of society and future generations and this is not possible when the person who controls the government doesn’t think about anybody but himself.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Super Pcs In Elections

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Money is an important aspect of the campaign process because a candidate must spend large sums of money so the American people can become familiar with the candidate they want to represent them. The American people needed to be certain that the candidate that represented them actually represented them and not the people who had enough money to persuade the candidate to look after their desires. Limits were placed on the amount of money a sponsor could contribute to a candidate. This insured that many sponsors could only contribute a small mount of money each so one sponsor did not gain too much power. So super wealth organizations and people such as corporations make their contributions to independent organizations that raise money to support or hurt a candidate without the money actually going directly to the candidate.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political campaigns within our contemporary generation are considered to be expensive affairs, as they have opened doors for the monetary system within the United States to coincide with the election process significantly affecting the decisions made within the political realm. Moreover, the presence of money within the U.S political landscape has become a political norm as individuals within the electoral process are granted the freedom to “buy” treatment within the favor of the candidates (Sidlow and Henschen 211). The contribution of money within the political system implies the idea of the electoral process having been turned into a “corporate” business. However, limitations set by the government through the enforcement of laws are in existence…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Author John Acton is credited for this phrase, which is used a lot today as a way to describe the current U.S. Congress. The question is, where does the power come from, and what is the most corruptible power out there? The answer is simply that Congress can vote to give themselves a pay raise. There is very little impeding their path to getting a bigger paycheck each year.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays