Super Prc Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
In 2010 the United Citizen v. Federal Election Commission would have a bigger impact on the way elections are won. The case decision concluded limiting the amount PACs and donors spend on campaigns for candidates violates the First Amendment. Since the court case decision, Super PACs were created to donate unlimited amounts of money to a campaign for a candidate. Super PACs were mostly used by Republicans. The Democratic party are opposed by Super PACs. However, even though the Democratic party are objective to the idea of Super PACs they have Super PACs themselves. The reasons why the Democratic party and some citizen politically involved are criticizing Super PACs because of how powerful they influence elections to sway their direction. …show more content…
They believe unlimited funds being raised will create corruption and will violate the average citizen 's political equality. During Obama 's participation in the presidential election in 2012 he spoke out against Super PACs. Obama was criticized because he had Super PACs that supported him. However, Obama 's campaigns were organized by average citizen and many average citizens donated to Obama 's campaign. "Obama, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum are getting between 47 percent and 49 percent from small donors, according to OpenSecrets.org" (Super PACs send price of 'free ' speech). These candidates are examples of the people 's voice. Many citizens put their belief and effort towards candidates that shows that the citizens believes in the candidate and their take on issues and …show more content…
Super PACs donations increase each year and especially during elections. In 2012 the Liberal Super PACs had raised 211.5 million that year. The Conservative Super PACs had raised 266.9 million in the same year. (Miller.) In 2012 the Liberal Super PACs amount had risen to 406.9 million and the Conservative Super PACs amount had risen to 860.8 in that same year. (Miller.) A minimum group of people in the U.S. can afford to contribute millions to super PACs. The larger the amount of money a candidate has for their campaign the more likely they are to win. In the Editorial: Super PACs Send Price of 'Free ' Speech Way Up, the author talks about the Super PACs impact on candidate due to the substantial amounts donated to their campaigns rather than an average citizen donating what they can to help the candidate they support. "Their generosity affords them considerable access if their candidate wins" (Star-News.) In this quote the author is stating that the money the Super PACs give to the candidate can have an influence on the candidate that leads to corruption not just in the election but it can become a much larger problem. The large problem is violating political equality, corruption in office and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They felt this way was because of the ruling in Buckley (Cite). In Buckley, the court ruled that limits on how much one can contribute to a campaign are allowed, in order to prevent corruption. In addition, they also argued that Illinois laws are more accommodating then most states, because a majority of states only allow one thousand dollar contributions to a campaign. Amici Curiae Brief in support of defendant at 1, Liberty Pac., v. Madison, No. 1:12-cv-05811 (Dis. Aug. 30, 2013). Furthermore, they argued that in Amici (Brief), the court concluded that contribution limits are constitutional, so long as they do not prevent candidates from collecting the recourses necessary for effective advocacy.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most active groups include, Friends of the Earth, The Sierra Club, and National Resources Defense Council. Both sides of the aisle have “given over $230 million to lawmakers last year alone…and that doesn’t include the $154.4 million spent on lobbying.”…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A series of wide-sweeping Congressional legislation which champions transparency in all matters of campaign finance is needed if the American electorate is to lift the veil on soft money…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The result of this is a lack of separation between the two, while in reality, the interests that a corporation has are far different than those of the individual. It is assumed that small donations from a person to a campaign will overall not affect the races as a…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you give big corporations or groups the power to not only voice their opinion, but also influence the thought of the masses, it strips the people from thinking for themselves. Corporations have an unfair advantage because of the large amount of money they have. These big corporations practically own the Senate and have the power to heavily influence their decision [Doc D]. Touching back on how big corporations overpower the people's opinions, their money is what allows this to happen. Because of this court ruling, big corporations, unions and foreign companies "drown out" the people's voice [Doc L].…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interest groups are known to be corrupt and always bribe secretly elected official. They only look after their desire and their need. I believe they should be tougher restrictions on interest groups, and they should be laws both federal and state level that investigates them thoroughly. If the government does not monitor interest groups closely they will be lots of corruption that will devastate the economy and the credibility of the United States as a thriving democracy. Interest groups mostly finance the campaigns of politicians who are running for office.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Political campaigns and candidates will have fair chances for running if corporations just don’t have…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political corruption is always brought up during election season and seemingly everyone has their own fix. Corruption today can be quickly discovered if one just follows the trail of dark money. Funds given to a politician from a corporation, whether in a campaign or as lobbying, is referred to as dark money by liberal politicians. Citizens United V. FEC was a supreme court case which ruled that money is speech and thus corporations can give endless sums of money to politicians under their constitutional protection of free speech. Liberal politicians often call these funds dark money because the funds are used to promote corporate interest, not the interest of the people.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ban on soft money was one of the highlights in the legislation. Critics of the soft-money ban argue that the contribution of money to political parties is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. “The amount of money individuals might contribute to state parties in federal elections increased from $5000 to $10,000. The total amount these individuals might contribute to federal candidates, parties, and other organizations increased from $25,000 to $30,000 (legal).” Expenditures for advertisements on television and radio have steadily increased.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PACs or also known as Political Action Committees are organizations that privately raise money in an effort to influence elections or legislation. Unlike Political Action Committees, Super PACs are restricted from making direct contributions to a candidate’s campaign or political party but are…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They ensure that after elections their elected officials are working hard to implement all the changes they promised to put into effect. They recruit, train and elect leaders who promote their mission in cities and states. They send Working Families Democrats in office to lay down a platform that favors all citizens. In all its years of action, the WFP has won increase in wages and has passes laws in states and cities for payment on sick days. They have also been able to facilitate the raising of taxes on the rich for the funding of hospitals and schools.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are the root cause for much of the corruption in our politics. They greatly benefit from many bad economic policies that give them huge winnings, and the nation has to pay for it. They then are willing to fund many congressmen and senators through campaign funding to lobby against policies that actually hurt the American public but greatly benefit…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Supposedly, the Super PACs are meant to be independent of the election candidates: they cannot be directly coordinating with any of the candidates, but they can pay for ads that oppose or support candidates. In theory, it is a good idea. However, there are too many loopholes for corruption to take place. In the 2016 election, two of Donald Trumps’s seniors staffers left his campaign and formed the Rebuilding America Now super PAC. They claimed that since they were not paid by Trump, they were not violate a law preventing campaign staffers from using their knowledge about a campaign to the advantage of an “independent” group.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American politics are centered on the split between two major political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans. Throughout history, Democrats and Republicans have emphasized and ascertained the evident differences between their policies. They are majorly perceived as black and white, liberal and conservative, however their similarities seem to be overshadowed by these differences. Democrats focus on change, while Republicans value tradition, but both parties have emphatical sources of political support and focus on expansion of surveillance and security. Democrats and Republicans have opposing beliefs, regarding political, economic, military, and social matters.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays