• Home Page
  • Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle On Life After Death

Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle On Life After Death

Great Essays
Show More
Starting from ancient times, there has dependably been a level headed discussion in the field of logic, of whether people keep on living after death. The debate brings discussion brings up on an issue of whether it is feasible for a person to have recollections of his or her life before death if at all there is life after death. Another question is if an individual conveys his personality to the next life after dying . A person identity would be imperative in recognizing if the person that passed is the same person living after death. The key issue in this argument is in what shape an individual exists in life after death. The primary major contrast between what Plato and Aristotle thought about the relationship between the Body and Soul. The two thinkers Plato and Aristotle both had hypotheses concerning the body and soul. Plato was a duelist, trusting the body and soul where two separate parts to a man. Aristotle however did not. Plato trusted that the spirit was the absolute most vital part of a man and had faith in the significance of good ideas, thoughts on the after life.

Plato imagined that …show more content…
Plants simply have a vegetative soul, animals are above plants since they have desires, humans are above animals since it has reason. For Aristotle, the elements of the body and soul are not different. Plato would have it as two specific substances, however are assorted parts or parts of a comparable thing. The soul is basically the Form of the body, and is not prepared for existing without the body,without the body the soul can 't exist. Aristotle 's effects Christian beliefs and also influence Thomas Aquinas. Christian theologians have gotten the thoughts, for instance, God is eternal and God is also the Final Cause (the Unmoved Mover), which is the Christian argument of God existing. Also the explanation behind the Universe and Aristotle 's teleology influenced Aquinas ' Natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Dialogue: Meno And Phaedo
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato's Dialogue: Meno And Phaedo

    Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo Introduction Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues Meno In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality

    The four theories of personal identity—body theory, soul theory, memory theory, brain theory— are very well discussed in John Perry's book, A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. In an argument between Gretchen Weirob, Sam Miller, and Dave Cohen, all these theories are put into question in a discussion about the possibility of life after death. Overall, throughout the book , in these discussions it seems as if the body theory wins the argument for having more pros and fewer cons than the memory, brain and soul theories. However, this theory is contradicted and deemed not possible because when the body dies the person identity no longer exists.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Plato, Phaedo, And Lucretius
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Analysis Of Plato, Phaedo, And Lucretius

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Phaedo And Descartes: The Comparison Of Mind And The Body
    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Phaedo And Descartes: The Comparison Of Mind And The Body

    During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo: Plato And The Argument From Opposites
    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Phaedo: Plato And The Argument From Opposites

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Greek And Roman Views On Death And Afterlife
    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Greek And Roman Views On Death And Afterlife

    Greek and Roman views on Death & Afterlife. The Greeks and Romans saw passing in a mind-boggling manner. While their demise customs had numerous similitudes, the importance of death and the afterlife between the two cultures. In both societies, the dead 's groups looked after by the ladies.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of John Perry's A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality By John Perry
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of John Perry's A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality By John Perry

    In John Perry’s A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, Perry discusses both the possibility of immortality (the ability to survive after death) and the question of personal identity. In the process, he proposes three theories as to what could account for personal identity: soul theory, memory theory, and body theory. First, however, it is necessary to discuss what the question of personal identity is. Personal identity refers to a human being’s numerical identity over time. Thus, the question of personal identity essentially asks what must be preserved in order for a person to be considered the same, or continuous, over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of John Perry's 'A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality'
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of John Perry's 'A Dialogue On Personal Identity And Immortality'

    In John Perry’s “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality,” there are many arguments that discuss the criterion of personal identity. Within The First Night, Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller begin to discuss the idea of an immaterial soul and its reasonability of existence, which is the main idea. Miller discusses the various reasons why an immaterial soul exists while Weirob argues its existence and eventually, its relevance. Throughout the dialogue, Miller introduces various theories to support the idea of an immaterial soul and its use of allowing the survival of a person after death. His main theory represents the principle of “Same body, same self” (Perry, 325) otherwise discussed as “same body, same soul.”…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Soul And The Body In Aristotle's De Anima
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Soul And The Body In Aristotle's De Anima

    Nonetheless, one of the primary notes that Aristotle makes in demonstrating this application of this theory to bodies and souls is indeed difficult to deny. He claims that for any body, of any kind “having life,” (or, the body of a living being), the body itself “cannot be soul” (Aristotle 412a19). This indeed is a claim that is generally accepted, for the claim that the body and the soul are distinct neither a new nor a radical claim. Hence, for animate bodies, the body itself “is the subject or matter, not what is attributed to it” (Aristotle 412a19). If the body is a substance in the sense of matter, it follows that the soul, then, is the “substance in the…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Augustine Analysis
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Augustine Analysis

    Lastly, Hobbes and Augustine are very similar with they describe men as beast because they have desire and as well they have free will and reason helps them to get out of things which is wrong, but according to Aristotle, he believes that the nature of man and how they become evil is with their body and their soul. Aristotle he also had desire he wanted to sink his teeth into making him one of the utmost key figures in philosophy. Aristotle goes through those types that man has gone through evil. According to Aristotle “that man by nature is blind to morality suggesting that man is naturally a creature, this backed up by his earlier works that man is born without knowledge. Then morality cannot be part of human nature as man has yet to acquire…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Argument Of Plato: There Is An Immortal Soul
    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Argument Of Plato: There Is An Immortal Soul

    Within every person, there is an immortal soul. Immortal meaning that after death the soul continues to live on. During the paper, I will explain Plato’s view towards the immortality of the soul, which argument of Plato’s is the strongest to defending his claim, then I will talk about three arguments as to why I believe there is an immortal soul within each human being. Finally, I will look back at Plato’s strongest argument from the first section and give my personal take on his belief as to why we have an immortal soul.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul
    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato's Final Argument For The Imorality Of The Soul

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle On Democracy
    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle On Democracy

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature
    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Theory Of Human Nature

    Plato felt as the Body was a hindrance to the soul, almost as if the body is the prison of the soul. Plato believed that you need to balance all sides of the soul depending on what kind of society you live…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Hume And Immortality Of The Soul
    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Plato And Hume And Immortality Of The Soul

    In order to understand the positions held by each thinker, we must first decipher what the terms, soul and immortality mean to both Plato and Hume respectively. For Plato, the soul is an unextended, incomposite and immaterial substance which functions as a bridge between the metaphysical world of forms and the material world we live in. He finds the soul to be definitionally distinct from the body, because it is the immaterial aspect of a human being, whereas the body is the material aspect. Hume, on the other hand, opposes this dualism and argues that the soul and body are the same thing. The term immortality is used the same way by both philosophers to depict, an eternal continuity of consciousness after physical death.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings