The Importance Of Physician Assisted Suicide

Improved Essays
Terminally ill patients are already dying-- suffering their way through their end of time and prolonging their agony. They should have the right to end their lives peacefully, so they can stop their suffering and end their life the way they wanted to. People’s choices are up to them, not us. We can’t control what goes on in life so why should we judge a person who wants to end their live on good terms. Personal beliefs, religious beliefs, and opinions all stop Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)from being legal in many countries and states. Now is time to make a commendable change in people’s perspectives about PAS. It isn’t a fallacious thing, it’s a easeful way of ending a suffering person’s life. Using your opinions such as religious beliefs, and your perspective of the outcome towards legalizing Physician-assisted suicide in invalid and selfish. Not only do you allow a terminally ill patient suffer and go through agony day-by-day. Medical technology is great to mankind, but for the terminally ill, it just causes more prolonged suffering for the patient. Terminally ill should be able to choose their own fate, rather than suffer. “Those who have a terminal illness and are in great pain should have the right to choose to end their lives and those who help them should be free from prosecution. We don’t let animals suffer, so why humans?” (Stephen Hawking, PhD, cosmologist and theoretical physicist) This quote proves that if animals have the right to die without consent or with consent then why can’t humans have the right to die in their own fate? What is so bad about a suffering person wanting to end their life peacefully? If religious beliefs interfere with physician-assisted suicide cases, but the majority are for it, shouldn’t it be allowed? People suffer the rest of their lives because a small minority of people don’t approve of it. Some people like to refer Physician-assisted suicide as a undignified thing which ruins the sacred home of human life. It doesn’t make anything undignified, it makes it selfish for one’s opinion to prolong suffering and agony to a patient 's life. People die from horrible other causes-- wanting to end your life to end your suffering cause you’re terminally ill doesn’t make anything wrong or different. Humans are humans and we all have our own choices to make. “Many believe it is wrong to end human life, because life is sacred and the endurance of suffering confers its own dignity for others, the legislation of doctor-assisted suicide is the first step on a slippery slope for a premature death that causes a cheap alternative to palliative care.” (The Economist Newspaper) People shouldn’t be downgraded because of how they choose to live their own lives and how they end their own lives. Terminally ill patients know their going to die. …show more content…
People say medicine is supposed to heal but it also can kill. Not everything in this world is for humans. It could kill, heal, and injure anyone or anything. More than forty-seven thousand people die from overdose each year in America alone. Many people believe that assisted suicide will downgrade medical technology and corrupt medicine. Medicine could cause the patient 's treatment to prolong his/hers suffering but won’t help anyone if they are terminally ill. It’s a waste of resources which that corrupts medicine and causes a lot of loss of money for the families and patient’s. People say medicine is a tool used for healing, not for killing. They say it distorts doctor-patient relationships, and will perverse incentives for insurance powers. This is not that case-- Medicine is used for healing in only some cases. Many times there is deadly side effects to almost all medicine in general, and with that, it isn’t healing that much in that case. Medicine which can’t heal anyone anymore shouldn’t be wasted, but if we let them choose how they want to end their own lives then it’s up to them but it’ll save them money and save resources for patients who need them who can be treated and healed. Medicine is just another excuse for an argument against Physician-assisted suicide, and use doctors feelings with patients as another excuse such as insurance providers and financial healthcare that will do abnormal enticement. This

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The policy prohibits active euthanasia, but the statement begins to deny that no further treatment is related to the intentional termination of life. Rachels points out the mistake in the statement. He thinks that doctors are only worried about the patient will die soon, or the patient’s life will become a huge burden. Nonetheless, he shows the same viewpoint in these cases that significant difference between killing and letting die hardly exist in the case of euthanasia. No matter what humane reasons that a doctor decides to let a patient die, his decision would be morally reprehensible.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To quote Dr. Robert Twycross, “To use such measures on the terminally ill with no expectancy of a return to health is generally inappropriate and is therefore bad medicine by definition.” (R. Twycross). For most competent and terminally ill patients physician assisted suicide is a way to die with…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By giving a way out, a doctor is not “killing” their patient, but instead making them more comfortable under the harsh circumstances. However, it is important that the strict requirements for eligibility remain intact. Physician assisted suicide should only be an option for patients during unfortunate circumstances in which they have a limited amount of time left. PAS should never be an option for people who are not terminally ill, including those with depression. This would ensure that PAS is only used for the right reasons and does not threaten the weak and vulnerable.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is for the Writer to examine and analyze methodology and legalities of ending one’s life options and ethical foundations surrounding the right to life targeting the following areas of concerns: 1) Physician Assisted- Suicide; and 2) Pro-life Proponent arguments. Background This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the public put themselves in the shoes of the patient and actually experienced what the patient was feeling, their view would change dramatically and support for physician-assisted suicide would most likely rise. If the patient does not want to endure the pain of their illness any longer, and there is not any medication that can ease their pain, they should not be forced to experience it any…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Pas

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Much like Brittany, and many others that have made similar statements in similar situations, I believe that everyone has moral right to do as they please with their life as long as there is no harm done to anyone else. This includes PAS. When someone cannot end their own life in a dignified way when they so choose because of a disability or disease, they should have the right to the help of a physician. This right if requested should then be respected especially when it comes to painful terminal illnesses. In fact denying such a request to me seems cruel.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States, the controversial topic of physician assisted suicide has been heavily debated. Should it be legal to terminate one’s own life, with the aid of a physician, because they have been afflicted by a terminal illness? One should have the option to not suffer months of agonizing pain, but leave their life with dignity. The only states that legally allow a person of a terminal illness to have a physician assisted death are Oregon, Vermont and Washington. If passed, the End of Life Option Act, modeled after the Death with Dignity Act of Oregon, would give the people of California who have been deemed terminally ill the right to a physician assisted death.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although physician-assisted suicide is only legal in certain states, many people look into this method. In many of the states in the United States, physician assisted suicide is illegal. There are four states that allow physician assisted suicide, and the four states are: California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. These four states only allow physician assisted suicide if the patient is terminally ill. Physician assisted suicide is a dilemma to the medical profession in today’s society due to patients getting deadly illnesses and it has multiple effects on the patients’, doctors, families, and the society in a bad way.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide should not be legalized because many individuals are losing hope and it is affecting the community as suicide rates have gone up, however many people are for it since it will end all suffering; moreover to prevent suicide rates to continue to rise, PAS should not be…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the patient chooses an unreliable method, like a drug overdose, the patient could be in more pain than they were before the attempt at suicide. In the article, Assisted Suicide is a Civil Right, Micah Issitt and Heather Newton wrote why assisted suicide is better for the patient 's health: "In some cases, suicide attempts may fail, rendering patients left with injuries that only increase their pain and suffering" (Issit and Newton 4). In other words, assisted suicide allows patients to end their life painlessly and quicker. To conclude, families do not want to watch their loved ones endure the excruciating pain, nor does the patient want to experience it when they only have a few weeks to live. Overall, the legalization of assisted suicide needs to…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people, will argue the morals behind physician­ assisted suicide until they die. According to Lesser (2009), it is not illegal to commit suicide, therefore it should not be illegal to help someone commit suicide (1). Along the same lines, if a society approves of assisting suicide for those who are experiencing grave suffering or terminally ill, it should be legal to help them end their lives (Lesser, 2009, p.1). And while it is not a crime to commit suicide and does not harm anyone, the law legalizing assisted ­suicide would act in citizen’s best interests (Lesser, 2009, p. 2). If someone knowingly and willingly wants to end their lives, but needs the help and courage to actually do it, why should anyone stop them?…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many terminally ill patients hope that their deaths be peaceful and with as much consolation as possible. Ronald Dworkin, author of Life’s Dominion, says that “many people want to save their relatives the expense of keeping them pointlessly alive…” (Dworkin 193). Terminally ill patients want to be able to keep their families and loved ones from any more suffering after their deaths due to countless and piling medical bills that they are now responsible for. This does not help these sick patients achieve any peace in these late stages of death.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone in the world will experience the subject of death at some point their lives. The common wishes in regards to this subject are to die a peaceful death, surrounded by loved ones, with no suffering. A practice that would allow terminally ill patients to have this wish granted is the practice of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide, or PAS, is an action in which a physician provides a terminally ill patient with the means to end his or her own life. Most people want to be in control of their own end-of-life decisions.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe everyone deserves the right to physician assisted suicide if they choose to do so. Its your body not the governments. You should have the right to do with it as you please. If an illness is terminal or becomes terminal you should be able to die respectfully. After all you are not harming anyone else or putting anyone else 's life at risk besides your own.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays