At the chronicle of America between the years 1760 and 1860 begins with the separation of colonies with the hopeful aim to birth a nation built from righteousness Independence and freedom. The latter part of this time frame America again will find itself at another defining moment. This time oddly enough was caused by social injustices. Here just as before the clash is the result from another social and humanitarian cause fighting for freedom and Independence this time 4 the humanitarian hand Justice for the slaves that have largely contributed to the production and growth of America itself this essay will explore two women authors whose social position supplied plenty of inspiration 4 them both to produce works both groundbreaking and influential
…show more content…
One similarity that defined both women insert a dominant way was their face and the connection of that faith with every aspect of their life. Both women appear Very authentic and sincere Christians. Slingback reading about sees effects of both women living out their faith make it easy for the reader to draw the conclusion that these women for sincere and honest with walking out their faith in everyday life While others Your Average Sunday Christian and looking insincere. Another similarity was their level of education and intelligence. In this era, Phillis Wheatley was somewhat of an anomaly. Most of the Caucasian female women at this time were illiterate. Phillis Wheatley was highly educated Speaking several languages and a successful writer Not to mention the most impressive part is she was a black female slave. Harriet Stowe also was brought up to regard education as something extremely important she attended two good schools both being the first to provide the higher level of Education for women again …show more content…
Phillis 's writing style lends itself towards Neoclassicism. And her background knowledge of Latin also came through within her poetry. Harriet Stowe, however, was predominantly a narrative writer. Her common theme found in her works show a person writing with purpose and intent. It is easy to see how Stowe thought out calculated stories that would draw in her target audiences and influence their perceptions. She did this with such grace and with that without turning people off with her hot button topics she has pulled them in and could influence them. Where Wheatley 's relationship with writing seems more of a passion for the writing itself and for the higher level of scholastic and knowledge. Stowe 's writing career seems more like a gift she is good at to make impactful influence and change without the feel of being overbearing in furthering a bunch of propaganda. Wheatley seems to write more to the scholarly
One similarity that defined both women insert a dominant way was their face and the connection of that faith with every aspect of their life. Both women appear Very authentic and sincere Christians. Slingback reading about sees effects of both women living out their faith make it easy for the reader to draw the conclusion that these women for sincere and honest with walking out their faith in everyday life While others Your Average Sunday Christian and looking insincere. Another similarity was their level of education and intelligence. In this era, Phillis Wheatley was somewhat of an anomaly. Most of the Caucasian female women at this time were illiterate. Phillis Wheatley was highly educated Speaking several languages and a successful writer Not to mention the most impressive part is she was a black female slave. Harriet Stowe also was brought up to regard education as something extremely important she attended two good schools both being the first to provide the higher level of Education for women again …show more content…
Phillis 's writing style lends itself towards Neoclassicism. And her background knowledge of Latin also came through within her poetry. Harriet Stowe, however, was predominantly a narrative writer. Her common theme found in her works show a person writing with purpose and intent. It is easy to see how Stowe thought out calculated stories that would draw in her target audiences and influence their perceptions. She did this with such grace and with that without turning people off with her hot button topics she has pulled them in and could influence them. Where Wheatley 's relationship with writing seems more of a passion for the writing itself and for the higher level of scholastic and knowledge. Stowe 's writing career seems more like a gift she is good at to make impactful influence and change without the feel of being overbearing in furthering a bunch of propaganda. Wheatley seems to write more to the scholarly