Personal Moral Theory Analysis

Improved Essays
If I had to pick the morals and values that would best describe my personal moral theory I would choose Utilitarianism, Deontology and Cultural Relativism. To be honest, when it comes to a topic such as this it can be hard to put everything in words. I don’t always inspect certain parts of life to see where I could apply critical thinking, but I do have ways of deciding what I believe is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in different situations.
In the textbook Think by Judith Boss she defines utilitarianism as “a moral philosophy in which actions are evaluated based on consequences”. She also defines Deontology as “the ethics of duty” (Boss, 283). The way I view Utilitarianism and Deontology is that they are two different sides of the same coin. Similar to the concept of yin and yang, they are both opposites but
…show more content…
What is socially acceptable to one culture may not be acceptable to other cultures and sometimes it could cause more harm than good between cultures. For example, in some cultures murder may be seen as being neutral, frond upon or embraced and the differences can cause a great deal of animosity between each other Cultural relativism is based on what people believe is perfect and can put false implications that humanity will be perfect someday, even though we are far from perfect.
Utilitarianism, Deontology and Cultural Relativism are the moral theories that I believe best describe me. Utilitarianism and Deontology have some differences, but in my opinion they have many similarities that fit me. At the end of the day, I’m human and I’m not perfect. Overtime, I’ve developed and learned to use my critical thinking skills, but there are times where I don’t succeed in my endeavors. I may change my mind later, but right now I will continue to follow my personal virtue theory because It’s what I identify with and it has not failed me

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The positivist argument that the world is “the totality of facts” and that there is no intrinsic values, just complex desires seems to fall into the same sort of ideas of critical thinking and the fact vs opinion distinction that is so familiar. The distinction between beliefs as a form of truth, and desires as individual, seems like it is similar to existentialism, although existentialism also deals with other aspects such as prime reality in a way that positivism does not directly. These two psychological states of positivism however, if I followed the argument Appiah makes correctly, will lead us to relativism. Another dead end in trying to approach the idea of morals and how they change around the world. I agree with Appiah’s argument against positivism though, in that not…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moreland, J. P. (n.d.). Ethics Theories: Utilitarianism Vs. Deontological Ethics - Christian Research Institute. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from http://www.equip.org/article/ethics-theories-utilitarianism-vs-deontological-ethics/ Personal values, beliefs, family background, socio-economic status and culture has direct relationship with the decision making capacity of an individual. For instance, most of people who have grown in poor socio-economic status are always in stressful situation because during their life they always deal with many kinds of challenges and some people take it as a source of strength and make themselves more strong and capable to deal with future situations, which helps them to achieve better ideas to make decision.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology is known as Ethics that focus on the right or wrong actions themselves, it opposed to the right or wrong of the consequences of those actions. Utilitarianism is a theory that argues that action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.(Fahey,2012) Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of "the end justifies the means." John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham was the brainchild of philosophers.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first process that must be done before diving into this question is defining the types of relativism. In the world of ethical relativism, there is a divide and bind between society and the individual. With society, the culture is what directs the morals for right and wrong. On the smaller scale, the individual’s morals are what guides him or her which can be separate from and even collide with the society’s moral standards.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Response to Rachels “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” Different cultures have different conceptions of right and wrong. The Eskimos, for instance, commit infanticide often, leaving their babies to die in the snow. Although we uphold the same value of caring for our offspring, an Eskimo family may be unable to care for their child and select death as their final option. In our culture this is viewed as horrific, but to the Eskimos, it is a part of life (Rachels 35).…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. When it comes to cultural relativism, there is no universal truth, however, it does have a cultural code. There are six main points about the topic cultural relativism that may help an individual understand how cultural relativism plays a role into a…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1) Subjectivism is just simply stating that our opinions are based on our feelings, so; it’s how a person feels on a topic. If someone simply states something is right or wrong then they are simply stating how they feel about what is being said When simple subjectivism comes into play the moral claims are literally just feelings of approval and disapproval. Meaning that if discussion about gay marriage was to come up, and someone says that they approve of it, then they are saying that they approve gay marriage. Cultural Relativism is the moral beliefs of a culture. So, whatever the culture says is a right thing to do they can do.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural Relativism is an essay written by Harry Gensler which main purpose is to provide a deeper understanding of such teaching as cultural relativism. In accordance with an essay social approval is the main criteria of morality. In this way, those acts that were approved by society can be considered as good. However, those that were not accepted in term of certain society can be considered as bad. Author of an essay argues that relativism is that deeply problematic.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cultural relativism views what is acceptable or wrong is determined by a group of people. Human beings live and exist in groups which are called cultures. These cultures determine standards that are considered as normal behaviour. Each one of us are born into a culture it maybe a religion, ethnic background, language and so forth. In these cultures, we get values which create norms of which we must uphold.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In class and in The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James & Stuart Rachels, I learned about the Minimum Conception of Morality (MCM). There are two key elements which make up the Minimum Conception of Morality. The first part states the moral judgments must always have good reasons for the decision. This often is confused with what they feel and not actually facts. The second part is that morality must always be impartial, and take all stakeholders into consideration without being bias.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This comes in two forms: individual relativism and cultural or social relativism. Individual relativism takes the position of one person on matters of morality. The individual deals with moral issues from his/her personal set of moral standards. Moral standards are criteria that guide the individual in his/her choices. For example, people who smoke thinks that it not harmless to others but on the contrary, it is which is explained in many studies.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays