They point out to the imminence of a Japanese surrender and the immorality of the civilian killing as arguments against it, and suggest it was done for political reasons. The antithesis camp argues that America was justified in bombing Hiroshima. Their main points are that it saved countless American and also Japanese lives, it was not intentionally targeted at civilians, and was the quickest way to bring the war to an end. The strongest point made the anti-bombing group is the argument that the bomb was dropped solely for political reasons, and the strongest argument for the antithesis is the research that a land invasion of Japan would have indeed cost millions of
They point out to the imminence of a Japanese surrender and the immorality of the civilian killing as arguments against it, and suggest it was done for political reasons. The antithesis camp argues that America was justified in bombing Hiroshima. Their main points are that it saved countless American and also Japanese lives, it was not intentionally targeted at civilians, and was the quickest way to bring the war to an end. The strongest point made the anti-bombing group is the argument that the bomb was dropped solely for political reasons, and the strongest argument for the antithesis is the research that a land invasion of Japan would have indeed cost millions of