• Home Page
  • Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Not Justified Analysis

Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Not Justified Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
THE USE OF THE ATOMIC BOMBS..WAS NOT JUSTIFIED By:Nazret T.

Harry Truman was not justified for using the atomic bombs on Japan. Two million innocent Japanese lives were taken in an inhumane way, the bombs were not targeted on military bases but on non-soldiers, also Truman based his decisions on racist beliefs. Firstly, the use of the Little Boy and Fat-man not only caused a massacre but the atomic bombs killed the Japanese civilians in a disturbing way. The Japanese that were killed by the bombs either turned to dust, died suffering from the burns of the radiation, or from uranium diseases. Harry Truman agreed to the dropping of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    Japan’s economy was down and running out of resources, but by the U.S. dropping the bombs it ended the war and allowed Japan to rebuild its country. The atomic bomb did cause fatalities, but it saved more lives that if the war was to be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Was Truman's Assassination Justified
    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was Truman's Assassination Justified

    I feel that president Truman’s justifications for the atomic bombs were subversive, superficial and misleading. He wanted to prevent an invasion of Japan in order to save lives. Since theoretically the casualty count of the bombings would have be much fewer than the impending invasion. He also wanted to prevent Soviet involvement, as well as displaying to them the might of the puissant U.S. military. To me, it just comes down to the semantics of the final ultimatum from the Potsdam Conference.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Why Did Truman Use The Atomic Bombs Wrong
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did Truman Use The Atomic Bombs Wrong

    There was no doubt Truman decision to use the atomic bombs weren’t wrong. There wasn’t any other choice than to use the bombs because Japan didn’t want war to end. Author Robert J. Allison chairs the History Department at Suffolk University in Boston and he writes about American history comments “the Japanese may have been defeated but that doesn’t mean that they were ready to surrender. In samurai warrior culture that then defined Japan, surrender wasn’t an option” (Atomic Bomb: Why did President Harry S Truman Order the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). In other words, Japan would fight to the death against all odds until the last men stood.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Was Truman Total War Justified
    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Was Truman Total War Justified

    Truman was justified in his decision to use the two nuclear bombs on Japan. Truman had two choices when it came to ending the war in the Pacific, either invade the Japanese mainland or use nuclear weapons. The invasion of mainland Japan would have cost the U.S. many more casualties than there would be if the bombs were dropped. I believe that the U.S. was justified in dropping the atomic…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequences Of Truman's Decision To Drop The Bomb
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequences Of Truman's Decision To Drop The Bomb

    A decision of President Truman of America in 1945 to drop a bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki causes many arguments for people. Some people say he should do it, some people say he should do it, and some people are neutral. I disagree with his decision to drop bombs in 2 cities of Japan. According to many government records from discussion of class, lectures and websites, this argument will be made.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Harry Truman's Decision To Drop An Atomic Bomb
    • 153 Words
    • 1 Pages

    What Is Harry Truman's Decision To Drop An Atomic Bomb

    Harry Truman had courage to take action by dropping the atomic bombs on Japan. After Harry Truman learned that the Manhattan Project was successful he had a very difficult decision to make. “He was faced with the choice to kill thousands of Japanese of Americans” (Harry, pbs) He had the power to end a war with Japan and kill thousands of Japanese citizens or risk the lives of thousands of American soldiers. Harry decided to drop an atomic bomb on Japan which took a lot of courage.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    President Truman's Decision In Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages

    President Truman's Decision In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    President Truman’s decision in dropping the atomic bombs was unjustified for several reasons. The atom bombs killed more than 200,000 people from the blast, fire and radiation. The use of the bombs was also prohibited by the government and was only supposed to be used for defensive purposes in case. The fight over Iwo Jima and Okinawa was devastating and both Japan and The United States lost lots of soldiers. After the US took control of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, they found that the Japanese would not give up and would fight for every inch of land they owned.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    With the war still going on, Truman gave Japan one final warning, which Japan ignored. Then on August 6, the United States dropped the weapon on Hiroshima. On August 9, the city of Nagasaki was hit. One day later Japan surrendered. President Truman made the right decision to use the nuclear bomb on Japan.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan was a sad and tragic event that killed thousands of innocent Japanese people. This fatal event could have been prevented with a single decision from our American Government in 1945. Our American government and President Truman decided that it would be better to take the lives of Japanese civilians, than to use a different plan that could have saved their lives. Michael Barnes is correct when he argues about atomic bombs being unnecessary to use in World War Two, because it took the lives of innocent people, it may have been racially motivated, and alternatives could have been made instead of using this weapon of mass destruction.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On The Atomic Bomb Decision
    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On The Atomic Bomb Decision

    Truman believed by dropping the bomb the war would end promptly. He was right in that after the second bomb was dropped Japan requested a break and then surrendered from the war shortly thereafter. Robert Newman wrote statistical charts containing data about the amount of lives lost in the Major Problems in the History of World War ll essays. The total amount lost across the world between 1931 and 1945 attributed to the Japanese was around 17 million (Newman, 419). To look at this number it is astonishing to believe that one ethnic group can cause so many casualties across the world.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis
    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis

    The atomic bomb was accredited with the end of World War II but that was not the only thing the atomic bomb should be recognized for. Many argue that the destruction caused by the atomic bomb was unjustifiable due to the sheer loss of life. But the use of the atomic bombs on Japan was justified as it shut the Soviet Union out of Japan and created nuclear deterrence that led to a relatively peaceful era. The relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were troubled since the Soviet Union’s inception.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    The United States of America dropping the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and August 9th, 1945, was a very controversial decision and the opinions as to if the attacks were justified or not differ between those living in Japan and the U.S. The U.S’s act of dropping the atomic bombs was not justified because the long lasting health effects the bombings had on the population was disastrous, Japan’s army was inevitably facing defeat, and the mass destruction caused by the attacks lead to social damages throughout Japan. Although the atomic bombs did ensure victory for the U.S and British forces, it was a victory that definitely came with a cost; the significant loss of the Japanese population.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Atomic Bomb Debate
    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Debate

    “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. ”1 These words were quoted by Robert Oppenheimer after the first successful test of the atomic bomb, the Trinity Test. The atomic bomb was being tested and designed by the “Manhattan Project,” a top-secret nuclear weapon development organization for the purpose of attacking Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The idea of creating the weapons was originated when Albert Einstein5 heard about the efforts of Germany to purify uranium-235, which could be turned into the atomic bomb.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bombing Was Not Justifiable Essay
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bombing Was Not Justifiable Essay

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay
    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

    4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings