Nuclear Energy: Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Nuclear Energy: Pros and Cons
Jovencey St.Fleur
11th Grade
Tabachynsky
Deerfield Beach High School
2015-2016
Physics I H
20033900

________________________________________________________________________
I am submitting my own work and have acknowledged each use of the words, graphics, or ideas of another person through citations and a bibliography.
Signature: _____________________________ Date: ________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Introduction It all started in the 1940’s, when two atomic bombs, “Fat Man” and “Little Boy” were dropped onto innocent Japanese civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. After the aftermath of the catastrophic attacks, nuclear energy was being rebranded
…show more content…
While traditional sources of energy like, wind or solar, depend on the wind or sun to create electricity, nuclear energy can still be produced even in the roughest of weather. Power plants work 24/7 and only go down for maintenance purposes only. Plus, nuclear power stations are much more compact compared to other forms of energy. Power plants are normally only the size of a large football stadium, while solar cells and wind turbines both need tremendous amounts of land to function at the same caliber. Another benefit of nuclear energy is its low waste. A single gram of uranium provides as much energy as a ton of coal or oil. Respectively, nuclear waste is around a million time less than the waste from fossil fuels. In Sweden and the United States, the nuclear waste is just stored somewhere safe, but the rest of the world reuses the waste to filter out the 3% of radioactive remains and place them in glass for permanent and safe storage. The left over 97%, which is mostly plutonium and uranium, is recycled into fuel to create more energy. The amount of waste is extremely small; if you took the all the waste the average French family uses over a lifetime, it would be the size of a golf ball. Additionally, the waste is deposited in deep geological storage sites; it will never be released into the biosphere, so its effect on the environment is miniscule. While in storage, nuclear waste spontaneously breaks down over time, while other chemical waste, like mercury or arsenic, last for eternity. On the other hand, fossil fuel waste releases invisible gases in to the atmosphere, causing smog, global warming, acid rain, and other atmospheric

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power plants provide 20% of the U.S. power. What economic advantages does nuclear energy have ?It creates jobs, it cheap electricity, and had a low fuel cost. It creates jobs because there are many jobs that deal with nuclear energy. Some may be dangerous but they pay good money.Nuclear energy facilities generate electricity 24/7 at a 92 percent capacity factor. This is more efficient than other types of energy—combined-cycle natural gas, with a 47.8 percent capacity factor; coal-fired at 60.9 percent; and wind at 33.9 percent.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Energy Benefits

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Energy Nuclear energy is energy stored in the bonds holding protons and neutrons together in an atom 's nucleus, when split the broken bon releases an enormous amount of energy—nuclear fission, according to Nuclear Energy. Nuclear energy has been a global energy alternative source for nearly half a century. Its predecessor, nuclear power, developed for military use in World War II became the biggest fear during the Cold War. After the Cold War, international use of nuclear weapons were banned, and an initiative to transform weaponized nuclear power into a positive model for energy. Nuclear energy is the most feasible alternative energy source because of its low environmental impact, relatively low cost, reliability, and high energy…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Energy And Nuclear Energy

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is efficient as in one small plant produces enough energy to run a about 100 homes for about a 1000 year without refueling. Now imagine this times a few hundreds. if all the world used nuclear plants for eighty percent of their energy consumption instead of fossil fuels and natural gasses the world will produce energy efficiently and in massive amounts, which will benefit us globally, socially, economically, and lastly and most importantly Environmentally. It reduces carbon dioxide production by a lot, and the cost of producing nuclear energy is much lesser than the cost of fossil fuel and natural gasses. Biggest plus point is that it is sustainable; as the energy is produced by a chain reaction and radioactive decay (most used elements have a half-life of at least a few centuries).…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it does not release greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane, there are no unfavorable effects on the earth and nuclear energy has a whole has the lowest greenhouse gas emissions of all energy sources. According to reports in 1998, “it has been calculated the emission of the greenhouse gas has reduced for nearly half due to the popularity in the use of nuclear power” (The Benefits). The only greenhouse gases produced in the entire process are through transportation of fuel. Extremely powerful and requiring small amounts of resources, nuclear energy is the most financially sound method of energy production available. Though there are not many plants in use today, nuclear energy already accounts for a large amount of the world 's production of electricity.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, fission reaction produces heat easily because of the enormous amount of released energy result of nuclear process. As soon as the nuclear reaction happens, the water in the reactor begins to boil and generate vapor which moves the turbines to produce cheap electricity. In addition, most reactors developed in this century are molten-salt reactors which are significantly efficient since they have a reduced size that allows an easy elimination of waste materials. Also, such reactors lend themselves to factory manufacture, reducing their cost. Furthermore, taking advantage of the endless fission process, nuclear plants are the most reliable source of electricity, operating full time for 18 to 24 months before shutting down for a short time in order to refuel.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They have many similarities and differences, but solar power is is still a better source. Both Nuclear and Solar are power sources for humans, but solar power is more convenient that nuclear. There is a cost to build both nuclear power plants and solar power farms, but solar power plants cost a lot more. However, the cost of the fuel for nuclear power (uranium) is expensive while the cost of the fuel for solar power is free. Both solar power and nuclear…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For example, it takes 450 solar stations to produce the same amount of energy that was produced at San Onofre. Second, Nuclear power plants are safer than other energy power plants for workers and nearby inhabitants. This is because working at a nuclear power plant is far less damaging than working in something like a coal power plant. Next, there is a stable supply of uranium and thorium for the many future generations as the foundation to create nuclear energy. Also, there 's really not much waste: the US disposes of 1000 times more EPA-registered hazardous waste materials (e.g., mercury, benzene, coal ash, etc.…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which in turn would lower the overall carbon footprint of the world. (World Book Encyclopedia, 1996). In fact only one Coke can sized amount of nuclear waste is what a normal person would use in their life if it were all nuclear. In contrast, coal waste is massive about 68 tons of solid waste of carbon is what the average person would put out over a lifetime if we only used coal for electricity. The waste from the nuclear power source is not being throw out excessively either.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness. Development: The energy produced would be the amount of kilowatt hours produced per unit of fuel in a reactor.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This generates heat to produce steam, which is used by a turbine generator to generate electricity. Some of the pros that are related to nuclear energy, is how little it releases greenhouse gases (CO2) because it does not burn oil or coal but instead use uranium are its main power supply. Another benefit that is unique to nuclear energy is the fact that nature…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays