My Baseline Ethics By Immanuel Kant

Good Essays
Final Paper Project My Baseline Ethics
I define my own ethics, as the rules I impose on myself in how I should act based on what I think is right and moral principles. It helps me to think and reflect on any dilemma that I may face in my life before making a decision. Personally, I find that what could be right or wrong for me may be contrary for other persons because we all came from different cultures and countries, with different perspective of what is ethical or not. In general, I believe that those actions that violate the social norms of each society, especially pedophilia, rape, kidnapping, robbery and other social ills are bad. It seems to me that to make a fair judgment, I have to ask myself three things: Who did it? What? And why
…show more content…
Ethics is the question of the meaning of life or existence. In other words is the same as asking us why I do this or that? For what purposed? Is this good for me? Is this good for others? The moral by contrast, focuses on actions or on the time to act. Thus, ethics is the reflective act before the action and moral is the right action ethically good.
Categorical Imperative for Kant’s Deontology ethics is all that is imposed, that prevails over the rest because is what we have to do, not what we want to do. The imperative is to stick to the rule when we have to take a position on something. I think that Kant’s Categorical imperative is divided into three parts that form a unity because without one of its parts cannot function or exist as imperative. These three rules are:
1. Act only in the way that you could wish that the maxim of your action should become a universal law. One example of this is when we said if I like to be treated with respect and dignity, to get it, I should give the same in return and always, not just when it suits
…show more content…
Kant 's ethics is a bit different from the others and a little complicated because it presents ethics in a formal way where the most important thing a person has to do before making an action is to ask what should I do? Unlike the utilitarian ethic where the key for them is material and they only think in the actions that will bring them the greatest happiness. In his view a person should always do the right thing fulfilling a moral duty to never lie, steal, kill, etc. Before, when I start looking about his work I thought that he was very rigorous philosopher because in life sometimes we have to lie to save us or to not hurt the feelings of others. Now after having researched a little more about his ideas I can reiterate my decision that his theory is the strongest one because telling lies can brings also bad ends. An example of this is when we say to a friend that she looks good with her new clothes to not hurt her feelings but she really looks bad. After a while she goes to a party and everyone makes fun of her and she ends up crying. Sometimes we justify a morally wrong action in its “good ends” that we really don’t know if they 're going to be good or bad. This is why Kant thinks you cannot measure the morality of an action by its outcome. He believed that the good intentions we have to execute an action is what really matters. In his theory he stated that we should treat

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The morality can be determined prior to the action. 2. Categorical imperative as used in Kant’s ethical theory is the tool which tries to eliminate the use of self-interest in deriving what we perceive to be moral. According to the categorical imperative, only actions which are done in fulfillment of duty are regarded to be moral but not action done from the motive of self-interest. From his view, any action done from self-interest are taken to be prudent rather than moral.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism. In other words, ethical egoism states that (i) There are objective moral facts and (ii) An action is morally good if and only if it promotes my personal happiness and it is morally wrong if and only if that action hinders…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believes that the good will is the only good without restrictions. The goodwill is characterized to be “good-in-itself.” He establishes moral decisions on the structure of an agent by good incentives, aspects and appreciation of the law. A moral agent would do a specific action not because of what it creates, as with past experience, but that they will understand by reasoning that that specific action is the morally correct thing to do. The rule that Kant requires for self-sufficient motives and that it applies to everyone is categorical imperative. This gives us a way to figure out moral actions and to make moral reasoning.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Ben’s circumstances, and circumstances of similar nature, if he were to act according to Kantian ethics, his approach would begin with carrying out the action that is aligned with a good-will and a moral duty to act. To Kantian ethics, human rationality and the development of the good-will are of central importance. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to recognize the demands of reason, “for reason recognizes the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination” (Marino 194). For Kant, it’s not the consequences of the actions that truly matter, but the motivation of doing them out of a good-will. The only genuinely good actions are the actions done exclusively out of respect for the moral rules.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rationality meaning one 's judge of values and one 's guide to action.“Settle, for sure and universally, what conduct will promote the happiness of a rational being.”( Kant) Kant first starts by arguing that we are indeed responsible for what we do. The actions that we take are not just a set of events that we have no control over. Other philosophers believe that they are just another set of events that are determined by the things we cannot control. He also bases morality as a matter of duty that is common sense. Whether we feel against or not we know the morally right thing and it’s our duty to care out our action.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When implementing deontology in a practical sense, there seems to be a focus on reason at the expense of the character of the person themselves, leading to a sort of moral absolutism – meaning that moral principles should always be obeyed regardless of context or the consequences which may result. When following laws blindly of the context or consequences, there seems to be the possibility of making a decision which may abide by the moral principles deontology puts forth, but practically seems to lack a genuine understanding of the situation itself. Aristotelian virtue ethics deemphasizes rules and puts concentration on the character of the person who is acting. However, virtue ethics is not without its potential issues as well. If practically implemented, which characteristics actually qualify as virtues will differ from culture to culture.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Duty ethics or Kantian ethics focuses on the purity of the will rather than the consequences of one’s actions. Kant defines will as what animates the body. In other words the will is where the ability to choose takes place. In Kant’s theory our will can be considered good if it acts out of duty. To govern one’s actions, Kant relies upon maxims.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    134); this stems from the constant pursuit of a morally valuable and just life, basing decisions on this ideal can rule out the best possible outcome for others. Kantian ethics are grounded on the dignity of rationality within nature; the nature of society is such that all moral agents should act in accordance with their duties and obligations (Wood, 1999, p. 3); one must obey the commands of the law even if the authority that dictates the law is unjust as it isn’t the agent’s job to dictate when to act and when to omit to act. Conclusion While Immanuel Kant condones actions committed out of sympathy and actions committed out of duty, he is found to prefer that all actions are committed out of a duty or obedience for a rule or law. Moral agents are motivated by pre-existing factors that have formed through previous experiences, this affects how they decide to or decide not to act in any given situation. There are however, actions that a moral agent is expected to do regardless of their desires.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This being said, I feel as though the outcome of an action does affect its ‘goodness’ even if unknown- consequences shouldn’t be overlooked, therefore I disagree with Kant. Kant (1724-1804) believed that the instructions/moral code we live by should be categorical imperatives not hypothetical…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays