Judge Garrett Film Analysis

Improved Essays
“Judge Garrett: In this courtroom, Mr.Miller, justice is blind to matters of race, creed, color, religion, and sexual orientation.
Joe Miller: With all due respect, your honor, we don 't live in this courtroom, do we” (Demme & Nyswanger, 1993)?

Judge Garrett orates a maxim that is espoused to be the umbrella of our American culture. Yet attorney Joe Miller portrayed by Denzel Washington, in the 1993 movie Philadelphia ripostes, that reality is not mirrored by the tenets of law and justice. In this movie, the language of the events and trial of future law firm partner, Andrew Beckett, channeled by the Academy Award winning performance of Tom Hanks, is replete with the overarching dialogue of non-verbal communication.
Hence, this essay will address some of the non-verbal exchanges portrayed and the efficacy of their deliverance as they are balance with and in contrast to the spoken purposes shown in this film
“This Case is Not Just About AIDS, It’s the Fear of Homosexuals”
(Demme & Nyswanger, 1993)
Attorney Joe Miller declares, in his defense of Andrew Beckett, his client’s
…show more content…
This is the first reference in the United States. Marx discovered a causative agent and diseased was now addressed as Human T-lymphotropic Virus III (HTLV-III) then Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) but culture adopted so many other names and responses such as the “gay plague or “gay cancer” (Demme & Nyswanger, 1993). The law firm where Beckett was previously employed enjoyed a “good ole boy” mentally would often display their contempt for the homosexual way and they were often overt and without

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Racism In Monster

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Walter Dean Myers' novel Monster, the main character’s defense attorney, Kathy O’Brien states that, “Half of those jurors, no matter what they said when we questioned them when we picked the jury, believed you were guilty the moment they laid eyes on you. You’re young, you’re Black, and you’re on trial. What else do they need to know?” (78-79), implying that within the American justice system those involved in the process have an inherent and almost innate sense of racial bias that clouds their judgment when entering the courtroom. In the United States it is said that you are innocent until proven guilty, however, the actual validity of that statement has come into question more often than not, particularly in recent months, despite being…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Randy Furst’s article “Black defendants, white jurors: Does race make a difference in the court?” is about racism and reveals that an all white jury is more likely to demonstrate racial prejudices against a defendant of color as demonstrated by his use of evidence. Specifically, Furst’s use of evidence suggests that on a mixed jury, jurors will acquit a non-white defendant more times than an only white jury. The first insight into the racism that non-white defendants have to face occurs when Larry Leventhal, Twin Cities defense attorney, says “‘I think it would be a challenge to get a jury that considers all the factors when the jury is white,’”(1). Leventhal’s reference to juries considering factors while white demonstrates that if a jury…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haywood Patterson's actions in the trials were elective. So, according to the Haywood Patterson article it stated, “Patterson was recognized as being the loyal, most militia, and most spirited of the boys.” He took his time working on a prison farm, was already a veteran of the rails. Haywood kept his temper and never disrespected the guards in an impolite way, even though they disrespected him in a rude way. Also, when Patterson was in court he was talking in a nice and polite manner but in the article,”General Knight kept pointing his finger in his face and giving him a nasty attitude.”…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Scottsboro trials were one of the most blatantly obvious examples of racially corrupted systems in the 1930’s. Nine boys were convicted, not on evidence, but on the color of their skin. There were many appeals and retrials, but for these boys, honest justice was served too little too late. The boys faced a corrupt system made up of unfair trials, several appeals, two completely different judges, and they were not pardoned until eight of the nine were dead forty-six years later.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ringo V. State (1986)

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s decision involved the Fourteenth Amendment along with a multitude of other cases in order to examine the totality of the circumstances. The court agreed with the Court of Appeals decision implying that a confession would aid Bond’s case and the detective promising to put Bond in contact with his family did not induce an involuntary confession. However, the detective’s statement that Bond would not receive a fair trail because of his race and the prospective jury makes the court condemn the intentional misrepresentation of judicial rights in order to convince a suspect in a criminal case to confess. In the cases of Ringo v. State (1879) they referenced the quote, “The critical injury is whether the defendant’s statements were…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you had committed a crime and were imprisoned for it. Would you rather be punished the way they would have two-hundred years ago? In The Virginian, by Owen Wister, there are many voices that speak about justice. The way justice has been viewed, discussed, and executed over decades has changed dramatically. Whose way is right?…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Baldus Study

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aside from protecting racially-motivated policing, the Supreme Court has also made it so that claims of racial bias cannot be made in the sentencing process. An example of this can be found in McClesky v. Kemp, where the Supreme Court illustrated that they would tolerate discrimination in the criminal justice system so long as no one explicitly claimed their racial biases (Alexander, 109). In 1987, an African American man named Warren McCleskey was facing the death penalty after being convicted for the murder of a Georgia police officer. Represented by lawyers from the NAACP, McCleskey challenged his sentence by presenting the high court with the Baldus study, an in-depth statistical analysis of Georgia’s death sentencing patterns conducted…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of racial injustice has been debated throughout American history; it has been especially evident in America’s legal system. No matter the decade, African-Americans have continually been wrongfully convicted for crimes they never committed. From Brown versus Mississippi (1934) to the case of Brian Banks (2002), one stands out amongst the others: the Scottsboro Trial. This case can be considered the epitome of injustice as the role of racism in the trial was extremely evident in the fact many of the boys’ rights were taken away and crucial evidence was ignored by jurors.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because Arthur Miller’s criticism of the informant relies on principal, not circumstance, his argument is more persuasive than Elia Kazan’s support of the informer. In On the Waterfront, Terry is asked to testify against Johnny Friendly on countless occasions, but he consistently declines. Once the mob kills his brother, Charley, he reacts violently. To avoid a fight, Father Barry says, “You want to hurt Johnny Friendly?... Do you really wanna finish him... for what he did to Charley...?…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Bridegroom” by Ha Jin, the struggle about family, reputation and homosexuality within the cultural norms. Ha Jin shows a good example for the Eastern people because it opens their eyes by showing them conflicts between the value of society and individual preference. Because the Eastern culture is different from the Western on society and the peoples understanding. In the Asian countries often society effects on the way people think. This short story is about a girl named Beina who was the daughter of Cheng’s dear friend who has passed away.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the other significant issues facing the African-American, and our community as a whole, and is brought up in the New Jim Crow is: the myth of color-blindness of our Criminal Justice system. Michelle Alexander reiterates, that despite the popular belief, our Criminal Justice system is not color-blind after all. She proves this argument by illustrating case after cases where our criminal justice system has treated exactly the same scenarios differently. The only noticeable difference in such similar situations has been the color and race of the defendants.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And, as we learned in class, even if we know that culture is wrong and against our moral judgment, we do not want to stick out in a crowd. So, in a courtroom setting, attorneys know that racism and the injustices that it causes are morally wrong and they may not agree with it, but they often put personal beliefs aside once they step in the courtroom. Attorneys adjust to the setting that is put in place by the others in the courtroom (other attorneys, judges, sheriffs) so that they do not stick out and risk losing their case for their clients. It is a depressingly vicious cycle. This part of the book truly hit home because it was stated in such a way that was understandable and was something I could relate to.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The book Ordinary Injustice How America Holds Court is a novel written by attorney and journalist Amy Bach about the American legal system, and how it was become flawed. In four chapters, she discusses many different cases where injustice and corruption has occurred in the United States legal system all over the country. I chose to focus on a chapter titled “A Troy Champion” which is the second chapter in the novel written about a beloved city council president, and former judge, named Henry R. Bauer from the city of Troy who is not as just as everyone has come to believe. Bach begins the chapter by discussing how popular Bauer had become. “To walk the streets with Bauer was to accompany a celebrity” (Bach, 77) she says.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Carley Cockrum Dr. Liang Sociology 29 September 2015 The Invention of Heterosexuality The “Invention of Heterosexuality”, by Jonathan Katz, is an outline of his views on how heterosexuality and homosexuality are modern creations. His article traces the historical process by which these sexualities were created.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The texts ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’, written by Harper Lee and ‘12 Angry Men’ directed by Sidney Lumet; both display contrasting features and qualities. While both are very diverse texts, they both share an undeniable resemblance, in relation to a single person affecting a group 's idea of a just and morally right decision. Prejudice and discrimination are a reflection of how both the accused characters in either text sway opinions about which course of action is correct. Two of the protagonists, Atticus Finch and Juror 8, exemplify how a single individual can drastically change what those around them perceive to be right and wrong. Children in both texts, specifically Jem and scout, and Juror 3’s son, are also an example of how one person…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics