Movie Review : ' The Movie ' Philadelphia Ripostes ' Essays

729 Words Aug 22nd, 2016 3 Pages
“Judge Garrett: In this courtroom, Mr.Miller, justice is blind to matters of race, creed, color, religion, and sexual orientation.
Joe Miller: With all due respect, your honor, we don 't live in this courtroom, do we” (Demme & Nyswanger, 1993)?

Judge Garrett orates a maxim that is espoused to be the umbrella of our American culture. Yet attorney Joe Miller portrayed by Denzel Washington, in the 1993 movie Philadelphia ripostes, that reality is not mirrored by the tenets of law and justice. In this movie, the language of the events and trial of future law firm partner, Andrew Beckett, channeled by the Academy Award winning performance of Tom Hanks, is replete with the overarching dialogue of non-verbal communication.
Hence, this essay will address some of the non-verbal exchanges portrayed and the efficacy of their deliverance as they are balance with and in contrast to the spoken purposes shown in this film
“This Case is Not Just About AIDS, It’s the Fear of Homosexuals”
(Demme & Nyswanger, 1993)
Attorney Joe Miller declares, in his defense of Andrew Beckett, his client’s maltreatment and discrimination, yet he personified bigotry and the prevailing attitude towards not only towards persons infected with AIDS, but a deeply held prejudice towards that is prevalent towards gays in the mid 1980s. In the movie, he bristles with disgust and revulsion and unapologetically draws away from Andrew Beckett as he reveals that he has Aids and that he is gay. Moreover, he…

Related Documents