Ordinary Injustice How America Holds Court Analysis

Great Essays
The book Ordinary Injustice How America Holds Court is a novel written by attorney and journalist Amy Bach about the American legal system, and how it was become flawed. In four chapters, she discusses many different cases where injustice and corruption has occurred in the United States legal system all over the country. I chose to focus on a chapter titled “A Troy Champion” which is the second chapter in the novel written about a beloved city council president, and former judge, named Henry R. Bauer from the city of Troy who is not as just as everyone has come to believe. Bach begins the chapter by discussing how popular Bauer had become. “To walk the streets with Bauer was to accompany a celebrity” (Bach, 77) she says. The people of Troy …show more content…
He is the man who first brought attention to Bauer’s misconduct. Troy was working for a department store packaging boxes when he was caught stealing a pack of gum, a video game, and Chapstick, totaling a price of $27.77, which constituted as petty theft (Bach, 87). He was given an appearance ticket to come to court. Frazier’s judge was Henry Bauer. Frazier assumed that he would have to pay a fine, but instead, “[Bauer] threw Frazier in jail on fifty thousand dollars bail” (Bach, 87). Understandably, Frazier is confused and angry, “By their constantly pulling us in, that’s what makes us bitter and all you want to do is rebel, and then that person comes out a hardened criminal” (Bach 87) he says. Bauer is abusing his power as a judge by imposing excessive bail upon the defendant. According to the eighth amendment, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed” (Bach 89). Frazier understands that his rights have been infringed upon. He writes a letter to the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, an agency that prosecutes abuses by judges, about what happened to him in Bauer’s court. The Commission is appalled by the excessive bail and starts an investigation on Bauer. The Commission investigates this cause, of Eric Frazier, and Bauer insists that he has done nothing wrong. “Bauer said the bail was valid because of [Frazier’s] criminal history” …show more content…
Bobo was sitting with a couple of her friends on a stoop of a building where one of her friend’s relatives lived, and she was arrested for trespassing. She, of course, was in Bauer’s court. Bach states that, “No record exists of her arraignment but Bauer set her bail at twenty thousand dollars ad charged her with trespass” (Bach, 94). If Bobo had had a lawyer, he or she may have filed a speedy-trial motion that demanded a trial within five days, and if it did not happen within that amount of time, she would have to be released after the sixth day. Instead, since Bobo was not appointed a lawyer, which is her legal right, she sat in jail for eight days on a minor trespass charge. When she finally had a court date, still without a lawyer, Bauer advised Bobo to plead guilty and only be imposed a small fine of ninety-five dollars. “The Commission investigating Bauer found in Bobo’s case and instance of ‘excessive bail’” (Bach, 95). Bauer continues to insist that he has done nothing wrong. “He argued that Bobo had been trespassing on what he ‘believed to be’ a crack house or a building about which he had ‘some recollection of prior drug activity’” (Bach 95). He sees these injustices as the right thing to do, even though they are illegal and they are hurting innocent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case was sent back to the original court and Richardson was resentenced to three years in state prison. This book touched on everything we have reviewed in class this semester. The first half of the book describes mainly the arrest and incarceration details of James Richardson. No Heroes, No Villains relates in many ways to chapter seven- Police and the Constitution: Rules of Law Enforcement in our Criminal Justice book.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Gideon's Trumpet

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gideon’s Trumpet In 1961, a case appeared to the United States Supreme Court that challenged a well-accepted precedent established by the court almost 20 years prior. The case being discussed in this book is Gideon vs Wainwright, in which the defendant is a fifty-one-year-old white man in Florida. Gideon was accused of petty larceny, and eventually found guilty in court. Gideon, though, was representing himself, as he could not afford an attorney and was never provided with one.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the years from 1787 through 1788 a number of papers began to appear that radically changed American government. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote eighty-five different letters to newspapers that helped ratify the Constitution and create a system of checks and balances for the government that the United States should still follow today. The Framers constructed the Federalist Papers to avoid many of the problems that the American government is facing today such as the Supreme Court infringing the boundaries of the judicial branch by creating their own laws. This violation of the delegation of powers can be seen in the upcoming case that will soon be decided on April 28th, 2015. The goal of this trial is to force every…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book shows how legal system is sometime fair since Stern’s opponents were financially superior and outnumbered him yet he won the case. It shows how a lawyer, Stern, does a great job. The book came after a disaster in New Orleans due to maintenance negligence prior to…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you had committed a crime and were imprisoned for it. Would you rather be punished the way they would have two-hundred years ago? In The Virginian, by Owen Wister, there are many voices that speak about justice. The way justice has been viewed, discussed, and executed over decades has changed dramatically. Whose way is right?…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, this victory was short lived. A month before her trail the judge rescinded her bond. We cannot be sure, but this may be due to the fact that “so many women had told the police I had confessed to them before I initially bonded out” (Page 7). This type of behavior is not uncommon within the jail system and the multitude of people who practice it are referred to as “snitches”. The nature of snitching in jail is not always centered on the idea of revenge.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marshall Court Case Study

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From 1801 to 1835, the Marshall Court consisted of six to seven Associate Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice John Marshall. He was part of the “Midnight Judges” appointed by John Adams on the last day of his presidency, in an attempt for the Federalists to dominate the judicial branch. Marshall was one of the last remaining Federalists involved with the government and his influence on certain cases lasted much longer than the Federalist Party itself. The Marshall Court increased the power of the federal government in terms of the meaning of a contract, the power of the federal government versus the power of the state government, and the regulation of interstate commerce. This became apparent in the Supreme Court’s rulings on Dartmouth…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King explains that a citizen has a “moral responsibility to obey just laws,” which parallels Socrates’s belief that an Athenian’s has a moral duty to the city’s law (King 3). Another similarity between Crito and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” is the way the law and justice is seen as a united, interrelated entity. In Crito, harming one law means harming all the laws and King sees injustice similarly. By examining the laws that oppress African Americans, King concludes that “Injustice anywhere” is injustice “everywhere” (King 1). Both Socrates and King conclude that laws and injustice, respectively, are are interrelated, meaning “whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly” (King 1).…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crooks Monologue

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While Crooks was upstairs reading his favorite book, California Civil Code of 1905, his dad called for him from downstairs. “Boy, stop reading that darn book and help me with feeding the chickens. One of the two roosters got out and are fighting again, and now I have to go and break it up before it gets messy.” Crooks put down his book, but right before he was about to open the door to go outside his mom called for him from the kitchen. “Crooks, that nice, young kid Georgie and his brother Tom were here earlier.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Loopholes Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I reflect back on the modules we covered during this semester, two particular topics really grabbed my attention “Wrongful Convictions” and “Justice Reinvestment.” These two particular topics provided me another perspective how America’s adversarial system has some deeply rooted flaws embedded it. In which, these flaws have created loopholes in the legal system to allow the local, state, and federal agencies to manipulate the people’s ‘due process and protection against self-incrimination’ during questioning of investigations by law enforcement agencies. In which, walks a fine line with these loopholes in the adversarial system to violate people’s Constitutional rights in the 21st century.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie, A Time to Kill, the main character Jake Brigance who is an attorney in the state of Mississippi describes the danger he faces when he takes on a murder case. During this period, there was still racial tension between whites and African-Americans in the state of Mississippi. The murder case that Brigance takes on involves two Caucasian men who were murdered by an African-American named, Carl Lee Hailey. Hailey murders the two white men because they raped and assaulted his 10-year-old daughter, Tanya Hailey. In the movie, Brigance is threatened by community members to drop the murder case.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The injustices of America’s justice system One like myself does believe that the justice system has in fact been bias towards African-Americans. Many people believe this because our country's history with treating African-Americans horribly and very unfairly. Yes, I do understand that some may believe that the bias of the justice systems towards African-American is just a fallacy and the number of African-American behind bars has nothing to do with an unfair justice system, but there are many studies that have proven otherwise. Even today, black men are being ridiculed because of their skin color.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . “America incarcerates more people than any other country on Earth,” argues Shane Smith. Seventy-five percent of people arrested for nonviolent drug charges are blacks and Hispanics. For minorities the system is broken because the system is biased to them. The justice system is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but for Latinos and blacks the system is guilty until proven innocent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays