The Trolley Problem By Judith Thomson

Improved Essays
Is it moral to sacrifice one’s life for the sake of saving another? Would it be moral to kill one individual to save the lives if maybe five people. To sacrifice or essentially kill a person to save another can be a task that is rather difficult or immoral for most. It brings up the question of morality of a human being. Most human beings find killing another human to be immoral. It is not in human nature to take another person’s life. Even though this may be true, Judith Travis Thomson brings up a scenario that tests people’s morals, The Trolley Problem. He lays two main scenarios that both involve an uncontrollable trolley heading towards five men working on the track with the opportunity to save those men by sacrificing the life of an …show more content…
You are standing upon a bridge that sits right above the railroad track. You see the trolley barrelling down out of control with no way of stopping. You then see at the end of the track five people working on it. There is no way of warning the five people or stopping the trolley,they will inevitably be killed by the trolley. There is a very large fat man that is on the bridge with you. You know through having a clear understanding of physics and of the train itself, that large heavy object, approximately the size of the fat man can stop the train. You would just have to simply push the fat man off the bridge. The question on hand for this one would be would you push the fat man off? A large percentage of people would say no to this problem, due to people having the logical guilt of pushing the …show more content…
It is a scenario designed to see if you are willing to sacrifice one’s lives for the sake saving other lives. The true test is though the decision a person would make it the specified scenario. It has been shown that people make different decisions depending on the scenario, even though it has the same premise of killing one person to save five lives. This problem has been reworked throughout the years to be applied to a countless of scenarios with still the same premise of sacrificing one’s life for another. I understand that people’s lives are at stake and compensating for just one life may seem better but after analyzing Judith Travis Thomson Trolley Problem and many more remakes of this, I have come to the conclusion that I would let nature take its course. I would not be able to flip the lever or push the fat man off the bridge or any other scenario in that matter because of the same premise of me stepping in and killing another person. I must disagree with most, that people are willing to kill another person for for the sake of another. It would be difficult to live a normal with the dark memories and guilt that it comes with killing an individual. This may be the case for me but for others it can be the other way around. Such as people can not live with letting so many lives perish just for the sake of letting one live. Some may deem it as worthy sacrifice.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Danny wishes to see his father, and all five rocks he throws hit the center of the sign. They then go down to the actual train tracks. They grab onto posts as the train flies by. They feel the power of the train and return…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Train of Death was one of the trains that Enrique rode on his adventure to his mother. “ His fingers uncurled. He tried to bounce his feet off the wheels and push away. But as he let go, the air pulled him in. The wheels flattened his right foot, then sliced through…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold Sassy Tree Analysis

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As he was walking, he came across a high, narrow train trestle. Suddenly, he noticed a train heading in his direction full speed. He was too shock to move, so he ducked. He thought his life was over.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The killer’s plan turned disarray, and through fear, their minds forced them to kill the innocent lives. Therefore, guilt might have invoked the need for the victim’s…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this brief excerpt from Joseph Nye's, Hypothetical Situation, we see a very unethical action soon to take place just as we intervene. A local military officer is detected about to execute three villagers for the death of one officer who was shot the night prior. We intervene and we are given the choice to shoot one villager to save two. A quick glance at this and you experience a sense of a philosophical dilemma. There are various ways to go about solving this dilemma and each one of them has its benefits and risks.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Up until the modern world, history has changed by either removing a feature or improving its structure. In the novel, “Orphan Train” by Christina Baker Kline a story is told between a 17-year-old orphan in the modern world and a 91-year-old widow who experienced a long ride in the orphan train back in the early 20th century. Vivian Daly, the 91-year-old widow explains the hardships she went through to the orphan, Molly Ayer. This story compares and shows the drastic change in the lives of orphans then and now. It shows how in todays society orphans don’t go through as much as the orphans from back then like Vivian.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While humans are very powerful, smart species, we are very selfish and often just look out for ourselves. Although humans have a pretty good reputation the sad truth is, we are very selfish, and when push comes to shove take care of themselves rather than others. In the famous trolley situation with the lever and five people, I would pull the lever because I couldn’t see the 5 people die and that seemed to be the best answer for me. In the second situation I wouldn’t push the person because one it is illegal and two I would be killing this person.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fat Man Simulation

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We are expected to discover new things about ourselves and our morality by using the online simulation titled, “Should You Kill The Fat Man?” By navigating through a scenario involving a runaway train and an evil fat man, the user of the simulation should finish the scenario feeling as if they learned something new about themselves. To begin, the answer four preliminary questions that establish our morality, and the extremes we will go to in order to make the best decision. Next, the simulation describes a scenario in which a runaway train has the potential to kill people. As the user of the situation, we are faced with many questions and options regarding who the train should kill, if we should torture the man who cut the brakes, and how many…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant VS Mill: The Trolley Problem The Trolley problem involves a runaway train that you are driving, but the train has breaks that don’t work. You can either chose to drive straight and kill five men working on the track or hit a switch that will divert the trolley onto a side track and only kill one worker, which would you chose? There is also a second scenario to this problem; the train can either go straight and hit the five people or a fat man can be pushed in front of the train, killing himself but saving the five people.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Short Bus, written in in 2007 by Jonathan Mooney, is a story about Jonathan’s journey through the United States one summer, in a short bus. Jonathan, who was labeled as Learning Disabled in school, talks about his experiences with dyslexia and attention problems throughout his schooling experience, and recalls the short bus, used for students with disabilities, and is set out to change the meaning of the “short bus”. Jonathan states that to him, most of his life, the short bus he would see coming down the road was “the symbol of disability and pain” (Mooney, 2007, p.6) in his life. One of his main goals during this journey is to reinvent the word “normal”.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why do people try to let others down using the saying “im better than you” when they're clearly not? All people are placed at the same value either there white,black,hispanic or arabian there all the same which means we should all be treated equal. If this world did not place people with the same value or acted like certain races were meant to be killers or child abusers then there would be more racism than there already is in this world and racism is already bad enough as it is. “Why compare yourself with others? No one in the entire world can do a better job of being you than you.” ~Unknown.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Sydney Carton

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many changes took place throughout the book with Sydney Carton. From the beginning to the end of the story he changed quite drastically. One of the changes was having his personal and professional life prompted him to go to France. The author, Charles Dickens, thought this was all necessary to show how Sydney wants to feel needed and how needs a genuine, good, person. As you may notice, Sydney Carton goes through a lot of changes.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lone Survivor Ethical Dilemma: Defending What is Right No Matter the Consequences The ethical dilemma in Lone Survivor is one that hits most American viewers close to home. Happening early in the movie, it toys with our morals.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays