Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

Great Essays
Miranda vs Arizona
In the years following Miranda v. Arizona, many changes were made to the verdict. The Omnibus Crime and Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 declared that if a suspect voluntarily confessed to a crime within six hours after his or her arrest, this confession could be used as valid evidence in a trial, even if the suspect had not been informed of his or her Miranda rights. The passage of this act was one of the first major modifications to the initial decision. Additionally, there were many other cases that followed Miranda v. Arizona that altered the Miranda decision. The United States Supreme Court cases that occurred soon after the Miranda decision served to clarify certain aspects of the decision. However, after 1969,
…show more content…
United States in 1928. In this case, a group of individuals were convicted in U.S. district court of illegally possessing, transporting, and importing intoxicating liquors during Prohibition. Government evidence leading to these convictions was obtained by wiretapping the plaintiffs' telephones. The plaintiffs argued that the evidence was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure, and appealed their case to the U.S. Supreme Court where their convictions were upheld. At the time, Chief Justice William Howard Taft delivered the Court's opinion, stating that the language of the Fourth Amendment " . . . can not be extended and expanded to include telephone wires reaching the whole world from the defendant's house or office. The intervening wires are not of his house or office, any more than are the highways along which they are stretched . . . " He clarified his position by adding that a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights will not be violated " . . . unless there has been an official search and seizure of his person or such a seizure of his papers or his tangible material effects or an actual physical invasion of his house `or curtilage' for the purpose of making a seizure." In Katz's case, law enforcement agents had scrupulously adhered to existing standards for applying wiretaps, but did not seek judicial approval (a warrant) for conducting a search and did not report the results of their search to a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    574, 13 A.L.R. 1159], holding that Fourth Amendment proscriptions against unreasonable searches and seizures do not apply to private conduct, is still good law and controlling” (Stanford Law School,…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though the search was made without proper authority, the State was not prevented from using the evidence seized because “the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by an unreasonable search and seizure.” In other words, Ohio argued, the 14th Amendment does not guarantee 4th Amendment protections in the State courts. Furthermore, under the 10th Amendment, the States retain their right to operate a separate court system. The Bill of Rights only restricts and limits the actions of the National…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets. Once he was arrested, officers searched his office without a warrant and found evidence of what he was being suspected of. They also searched Weeks home without a warrant, but found no evidence.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being arrested based on zero evidence to accuse you of a crime and at the very same time being forced to answer intimidating questions that could be used against you. Miranda v. Arizona is an iconic court case that created a large impact on racial discrimination and even how arrests would be made. It started in 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. He was in custody for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Ernesto Miranda appealed with the Arizona Supreme Court claiming that the police had unconstitutionally received his confessions.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rights when being questioned by the police Miranda v Arizona Miranda offered self incriminating evidence during police interrogations without prior notification of his rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Defendant, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested under allegations of kidnapping and rape. Mr. Miranda was an immigrant, and although the officers did not notify Mr. Miranda of his rights, he signed a confession after two hours of investigation. The signed statement included a statement that Mr. Miranda was aware of his rights.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ruling of the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona helped justify the full knowledge of legal and citizen rights that a defendant has in court. The case aided both the detained suspects and police officers/suspects with the defendants being aware of what rights they have while their under custody while legal authority knew and recited what they have to say to an individual that place in…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2012 Dbq Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, the government made more considerable efforts to reshape American democratic ideals. During this time, the government had the ability to enact changes as reactions to the objectives of other groups seeking to redefine these ideas, however, it often recognized the lack of social and economic equality for all groups and approached reform during this era broadly so that many minority groups became democratically equal to the majority. For example, many politicians recognized the need for new policies and thus directed their political agenda to conceiving and instituting such legislation. According to Robert F. Kennedy in his speech announcing his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President, he recognized that the United…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States v. Leon case, the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied so as to bar the use in the prosecution's case in chief of evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid. Pp. 905-925. (United States v. Leon, (1984) No. 82- 1771.)…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Katz Vs Katz

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Katz v. United States, Charles Katz was involved in a gambling operation because he was a bookie. In this gambling operation he would frequently visit the same pay phone and speak to different people in Miami and across interstate lines because he was in Las Angles. The FBI decided to bug the phone booth from the exterior. They had not received a warrant to breach Mr. Katz’s fourth amendment right.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The investigators found a written confession admitting the offense. However, the police officers who arrested Miranda did not advise him to have an attorney during the interrogation. Even though the court charged Miranda for the crimes, the appeal in the Supreme Court of Arizona found no violation of his constitutional rights since he failed to request counsel. The amendment in check was the Fifth Amendment. D. 419 U.S. 565 Goss v. Lopez Argued: October 16, 1974 Decided: January 22,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I'm confused, but in this case, I consider that the police seemed to violate the Fourth Amendment, which enforces to guard the citizen's privacy rights and restricts the police against unreasonable searches and seizures. As a result, the drugs seized at Jim's house should not be used as evidence to convict him. It is the duty of the police department to update their databases often to avoid such situations. In addition, they must ensure all searches and arrests are legal.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exclusionary rule has been weakened recently, as cars, plain sight, those already arrested, and those on probation are not affected by the exclusionary rule. Therefore, the police do not need to obtain warrants for searches and seizures in those cases as they are deemed reasonable. Inevitable discovery and good faith exceptions are further barriers for the exclusionary rule, as they allow for illegal evidence in those circumstances to be used in a trial. Miranda rights have not been enforced as strongly by the Burger Court as they had with the Warren Court, although they are still an important part of police procedures and required for investigation. The court has been divided on issues concerning double investigations, unsure if Miranda Rights still apply in those situations.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arizona in 1966. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for various serious crimes. He was not informed of his rights before the police interrogation in which he supposedly gave a recorded confession to the crimes. He also did not have a counsel present. Miranda was found guilty of his crimes solely on the basis of his confession.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays