Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct. The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the Laws of Connecticut Colony both prohibit the use of torture in order to extract information or a confession from those suspected of breaking the law. Specifically in The Massachusetts Body of Liberties, torture is only prohibited if the authorities lack sufficient evidence to follow through with …show more content…
The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

    Television shows and movies have depicted the scenario where a suspect is arrested and read their Miranda rights. The process of reading a suspect their rights appears to be critical before a suspect is handcuffed and placed into police custody. The podcast entitled Miranda v Arizona by the author South East Texas CJ (2015) highlights why reading suspects their rights is so important. Miranda V Arizona was a case involving a female victim who was restrained, kidnapped, and raped in the year of 1963 in Phoenix Arizona. The woman was released near her home.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case
    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case

    On June 13, the court came to the decision on the Miranda vs. Arizona case saying that all suspects must be told what their rights are before they are arrested. On March 2, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was deliberatly interrogated after being arrested for robbery, rape, and kidnap. . However, he was not informed of his rights before being questioned and Miranda confessed to robbery, rape, and kidnap. Mentally unstable and alone, miranda was without an attorney at trial and the prosecution formed their case off of the fact that Miranda confessed earlier. Sentenced with 20-30 years in prison, Miranda tried to convince the Arizona Supreme Court that his confession was given unconstitutionally and it was unfair, but the punishment still remained.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?” This is the Miranda warning or more widely known as the Miranda rights. Police are required to read these rights to anyone they arrest, they are required to under Miranda V. Arizona to protect against self-incrimination. Ernesto Arturo Miranda, who raped, kidnapped, murdered and armed robbed was arrested and convicted after an interrogation where he was not informed of his rights. After that Miranda was taken to court and was convicted of rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20-30 year.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Summary
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Summary

    However, he later attempted to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of Arizona, his attorney arguing that due to the fact that he was not told his Fifth and Sixth amendment rights as an American citizen, that all the confessions he made before he was told the rights cannot be used against him. Although the police admit that they neglected to inform him of his rights, the court still ruled Miranda guilty, as he had been convicted previously and should already know the rights he has in interrogation. The ruling was later reversed by the Supreme Court. Contextualize. Why did it matter at the given time in History?…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Alito's Case Summary
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Samuel Alito's Case Summary

    This case pointed out that the 5th and 6th amendment rights included in Miranda won´t apply if a person didn´t have the legal rights in the first place. I believe the supreme court decision in Salinas v. Texas was accurate because without being interrogated and in custody there is no legal rights for the officers to give a person their…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases
    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases

    In the early 1960’s four men were arrested on different crimes.. In the police department those men confessed to their crimes without ever being told their rights, mainly that the Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment. The confessions were used in court, and it became a question of whether those men’s constitutional rights had been violated. The question was answered in the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    This ensures that only statements freely made by a defendant can be used in court. They observed that “the modern practice of in-custody interrogation is psychologically rather than physically oriented,” giving custodial interrogations by the police as an example. The police must ensure that defendants are aware of their rights before they are questioned, backed up by the Fifth Amendment. They also decided that any statements made by defendants during a custodial interrogation in which the defendant has not been read his “Miranda rights” do not count in any court.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rule Vs Exclusionary Rule
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Rule Vs Exclusionary Rule

    The Miranda, and Exclusionary rules, are rules that deal with the arresting and processing of criminal suspects by law enforcement. The Miranda Rule, which states that suspects must be informed of their fifth and sixth amendment rights prior to investigation was established from the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The fifth amendment grants the suspect the right to remain silent during interrogation while the sixth amendment grants the suspect a lawyer for proper legal counsel. The Exclusionary rule, which was established form the Supreme Court case Weeks v. United States (1914), states that any evidence that was obtained illegally cannot be used court. Rules and tests play a crucial role in judicial cases, in that they protect the accused from malpractice, and unfair treatment; as well as ensuring a fair…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Vs 5th Amendment
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14th Amendment Vs 5th Amendment

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fifth Amendment: The Miranda Warning
    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fifth Amendment: The Miranda Warning

    The Miranda Warning is designed to inform anyone in police custody the right to due process by adhering to the Fifth Amendment. Certain protocols and formality must be followed by implementing four things before conducting an interrogation. The defendant must first be informed that they have the right to remain silent (Hall, 2015). Secondly, they must be informed that anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law (Hall, 2015). They should also be informed that they have a right to receive legal advice (Hall, 2015).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Rights: The Fifth Amendment To The United States

    In criminal cases , the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids double jeopardy,and protects against self incrimination . It also requires that “due process of law” be part of any proceeding that denies a citizen “life, liberty or property” and requires the government to compensate citizens when it takes private property for public use. All of your miranda rights are you have the right to remain…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment

    Even in cases where rights have been waived according to the standards of the Miranda decision, it is still possible for a confession to be deemed coerced. Subsequent case law has ruled that continuing to speak to police after being informed of one’s right not to is an implicit waiving of the right to remain silent, and that not explicitly requesting an attorney is an implicit waiving of that right as well. Even so, confessions…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings