Miranda Vs. Arizona Case Study

Decent Essays
Show More
Television shows and movies have depicted the scenario where a suspect is arrested and read their Miranda rights. The process of reading a suspect their rights appears to be critical before a suspect is handcuffed and placed into police custody. The podcast entitled Miranda v Arizona by the author South East Texas CJ (2015) highlights why reading suspects their rights is so important. Miranda V Arizona was a case involving a female victim who was restrained, kidnapped, and raped in the year of 1963 in Phoenix Arizona. The woman was released near her home. Officer later arrested Mexican Immigrant, Ernesto Miranda who was taken into custody placed in a lineup and later identified by the victim. The United States Courts (n.d) further highlights

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Court Case Brief-Arizona V. United States
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Brief-Arizona V. United States

    Case Brief- Arizona v. United States Issue: The state of Arizona enacted a statute known as Senate Bill 1070 in 2010. S.B. 1070 was to address a large number of illegal immigrants in the state.’ Is the Arizona statute S.B. 1070 constitutional? Do any part of the Arizona statute violate the constitution and if so what parts do it violate?…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona Vs Hicks Case Study
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arizona Vs Hicks Case Study

    Citation: Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987) Parties: State of Arizona, Petitioner James Thomas Hicks. Respondent Facts: In this case, Respondent fired a bullet through the floor of his apartment, striking the person who lives in the apartment below him. Upon arriving at the scene, police entered the apartment to search for Respondent. While at the scene, a police officer found two sets of expensive stereo components and became reasonably suspicious of where it was located.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case
    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case

    On June 13, the court came to the decision on the Miranda vs. Arizona case saying that all suspects must be told what their rights are before they are arrested. On March 2, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was deliberatly interrogated after being arrested for robbery, rape, and kidnap. . However, he was not informed of his rights before being questioned and Miranda confessed to robbery, rape, and kidnap. Mentally unstable and alone, miranda was without an attorney at trial and the prosecution formed their case off of the fact that Miranda confessed earlier. Sentenced with 20-30 years in prison, Miranda tried to convince the Arizona Supreme Court that his confession was given unconstitutionally and it was unfair, but the punishment still remained.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona Judicial System Case Study
    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona Judicial System Case Study

    A. Arizona 's plural executives have a clear line of succession. The plural executives of Arizona are, listed in order of succession, the Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction (RioLearn. (n.d.). Structure, Term, and Qualifications.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963
    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1963

    This claim was questioned greatly and first went to the Arizona Supreme court, then proceeded to go to the US Supreme court. The ending decision of this case led to Ernesto Miranda receiving life in prison and the Miranda rights to be put in place in law enforcement. The supreme court case of Miranda vs Arizona is one of the most controversial court cases in American history but it is also one of the most celebrated because of the increase of civil rights for suspected criminals. Ernesto Miranda’s Arizona trial began on June 20th of 1963. Miranda went into the trail with the claim that the police officers who brought him in did not specify that he had the right to stay quiet, even at one point saying that the policemen, Officer Cooley and Young,…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    Imagine being arrested based on zero evidence to accuse you of a crime and at the very same time being forced to answer intimidating questions that could be used against you. Miranda v. Arizona is an iconic court case that created a large impact on racial discrimination and even how arrests would be made. It started in 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. He was in custody for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Ernesto Miranda appealed with the Arizona Supreme Court claiming that the police had unconstitutionally received his confessions.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Rights Dbq Analysis

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Rehnquist: The Case Of Miranda V. Arizonia
    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chief Justice Rehnquist: The Case Of Miranda V. Arizonia

    Chief Justice Rehnquist was appointed by Richard Nixon, in part as a response to the Warren Court’s liberal streak, which he used as a campaign issue. During his confirmation he was met with controversy as it became apparent he in fact disagreed with the precedent set in Borwn v. Board of Education. As an associate Justice he began as states’ rights advocate, which often not only placed Rehnquist not only in the minority, but as a lone dissenter. As time wore on the Court began to become more ideologically centered on the right. It was around this time that Associate Justice Rehnquist became Chief Justice Rehnquist.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V Arizona 1966
    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda V Arizona 1966

    Miranda v Arizona, (1966 is known as a high status landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. In a 5-4 majority rule, the Court brought both accusations and justifiable statements made in acknowledgement to interrogation by an offender in police custody will be justifiable by trial only if the pursuance can clearly show that the offender was informed of the right to be consulted with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against atoning oneself before police questioning, and that the offender not only had an understanding the these right, but freely accepted them. It had a huge impact on law enforcement in the US, by creating what lead and became to be known as the Miranda Rights, a routine all police grew accustomed too only to ensure that suspect were briefed of their right. The Supreme Court determined Miranda sentence by getting reference from other cases: California v. Stewart, Vignera v. New York and Westover v. United States.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    The case posed questions regarding the conduct of an inmate who participated in assisting fellow prisoners in planning the appeals for a writ of habeas corpus and any other legal papers. The amendment in scrutiny was the 28 U.S.C ~ 2242 that violates such prisoner actions. C. 384 US 436 (1966) Miranda v. Arizona Argued 2/28/66; 3/1/66; 3/2/66 Decided Jun 13, 1966 On March 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the allegations of rape and kidnapping.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Miranda Rights Important
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Miranda Rights Important

    The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from having to testify if doing so will incriminate themselves in the process; however, until the precedent setting ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, by the Supreme Court, the Fifth Amendment only extended into the courtroom. When Ernesto Miranda was arrested, interrogated, and made to give a written confession to a kidnapping and sexual assault in Arizona, he was charged with 20-30 years on each count. Miranda went to the Supreme Court of Arizona where it was decided that his constitutional rights were not infringed upon, but the case soon went to the Supreme Court of The United States of America. After a vote of 5-4 on June 13, 1966, the Supreme Court ruled that “there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves” because “without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    Arizona can also be put into the frame of judicial activism. The Supreme Court created a new law, bypassing the elected legislative branch of government, in order to protect the rights of the accused. The law that requires police to read the defendant the “Miranda Rights” not only helps to protect the defendant from self-incrimination under duress, but it also reduces police violence and other forms of intimidation that could lead to a false confession. The new law protects the rights of the accused and changes the behavior of the police towards arrests and interrogations, reconciling growing police powers with individual basic…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings