Violate The Fourth Amendment

Improved Essays
I'm confused, but in this case, I consider that the police seemed to violate the Fourth Amendment, which enforces to guard the citizen's privacy rights and restricts the police against unreasonable searches and seizures. As a result, the drugs seized at Jim's house should not be used as evidence to convict him.

It is the duty of the police department to update their databases often to avoid such situations. In addition, they must ensure all searches and arrests are legal.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Was the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments violated? Holding: The Trial Court held that the officer did have probable cause to search the vehicle and arrest the three men. The Supreme Court held that the officer did have probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed the crime of possession of a controlled substance. The Supreme Courts holding that the officer had probable cause to arrest Pringle also proves that the officer did not violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In chapter six, the author examines searches for evidence. The fourth amendment commands the use of warrants. As previously stated, warrants usually consist of three elements to meet the fourth amendment standard. I believe the knock and announce rule is truly effective procedure because this standard can protect officers from injury and more than likely preserve physical evidence from being destroyed. This is also a valuable tool in preventing a high risk target from escaping the scene.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the Fourth Amendment violated by police action of remotely accessing a GPS or a vehicle’s tracking capabilities without a warrant or the probable cause necessary for the acquiring thereof, therefore necessitating Senator Snowy’s support of Taylor Thomas’s bill; and what would be the implications on the future of Fourth Amendment law if Senator Snowy declined to support the bill and thusly permitted the dubious practices to persist indefinitely? SHORT ANSWER Notwithstanding the current sentiments and Fourth Amendment law which allow the police to remotely accesses the GPS tracking capabilities of vehicles of presumably innocent citizens, Senator Thomas’s bill should be supported by Senator Snowy because the current tactics utilized by the…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every day there is another media piece decrying the evils of the NRA or assuring the masses that the second amendment should not apply to AR15s because they are the cause of school shootings etc. Yet, each and every story is simply the opinion of someone who is hopelessly uneducated and brainwashed by the emotional rhetoric of the elitist left. Unfortunately, most of the cited facts are either complete fiction or half truths taken out of context and reformed to fit the desired narrative. Let’s set a few things straight, for starters, the second Amendment guarantees a right to the people, as does the first and fourth Amendments. This fact was reaffirmed by the D.C. vs Heller Supreme Court decision of 2008, more information can be found here.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most commonly known amendments are those that are considered part of the Bill of Rights. However, one of the most important amendment that every citizen should know is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is broken in three parts that imply that people should have the right to be secure in and of their property, no warrants should be issued without any unreasonable cause and that if there is a warrant, then they should specify the place and people of search. Many citizens do not completely understand this amendment to the extent to exercise this right.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment was passed by congress on September 25, 1789 and ratified on December 15, 1791. It stems from before the Revolution when the American colonists were under the control of the British. According to “The History of the 4th Amendment”, “tax bills placed on the colonists drove some to start secret smuggling organizations to counteract the taxation”.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 4th amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 4th amendment states that; “U.S. citizens are protected from unreasonable searches of a person’s property.” Mrs. Jones was only being a good neighbor and friendly. But the police lied to her that way they could gain access to her house. Then they proceed to look around then arrest her when they find a bomb. Yes, arresting her would protect everyone else, but you have to have a warrant before you can even arrest anyone.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After having failed in the previous attempt to enter the house, the officers forcibly go in using a purported search warrant and searched the home in which crude materials were found. The rule of law in scrutiny was the violation of the American Constitution as explained in the Fourth Amendment. The law termed all evidence collected in violation of this amendment to be unacceptable and irrelevant in the court proceedings. Question…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fourth amendment is important to all Americans and it is one of the most important amendments. The fourth amendment is important because it protects Americans from unreasonable search and seizure. “To protect Americans from the government invading our privacy and looking through our things, then finding evidence that might be used against us to convict Americans of crimes, the colonials put in the fourth amendment to free Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures.” (“Fourth Amendment with English captions”) The Fourth Amendment is: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Violate The 1st Amendment

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The school decision in this case does not violate the 1st amendment, because the purpose of this choice was to protect the affiliated students from possible violence and disturbances in the classroom. The five students were wearing American flag clothing on the school grounds, which included a shirt and a bandanna. The wearing of this clothing could fall under freedom of speech, because this could be seen as an act of expressing their patriotism or citizenship in the United States, but they did violate the school policy by wearing bandanas. There was also no evidence that the flag actually caused any violence or disruptive, but the purpose of the choice to ask students to remove the clothing, was to avoid this from happening. The school's interest…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The question of the case against Mapps was if the evidence obtained through the search violated the Fourth Amendment and should it been allowed for criminal proceeding…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays