Manifesto Of The Communist Party: A Marxist Analysis

Improved Essays
Marx uses his theory of historical materialism to justify his idea that class systems lead to conflict. “Historical materialism” is an approach to the study human beings that understands economic conditions as the real drivers of the development of human society. Society changes as the economy changes. As Marx states, "the previous feudal or guild organization of history…now no longer sufficed for the growing wants of the new markets”1. Therefore, a new class system can be formed as people use their own resources and skills to succeed in a changed economy. Human-beings are makers, and society is centered around the production of wealth and materials. Marx believes that philosophers should be concentrating on economic conditions to understand …show more content…
Omid Payrow Shabani and Monique Deveaux (Don Mills: Oxford University Press, 2014), p. 238

the current state of the proletariat. Much like other lower-classes in the past, “the victory of the proletariat [is] equally inevitable”5. However, Marx believes that a Communist society will rise from the ashes of capitalism. Through revolution, the proletarians will gain the power to avoid the mistakes that the bourgeoisie made. They will not want to build a class-system that will continue to suppress humanity’s natural creativity and productivity. Therefore, for society to move forward after a proletarian revolution, a socialist government will likely be founded. Bourgeoisie-owned property will likely be destroyed, and the new rulers will encourage the idea of public ownership and wealth. Everyone is equally liable to labour, and everyone will be able to receive the resources needed to survive. Eventually, society will become truly Communist, and citizens will be free to create their own careers without fear of starvation or oppression. The practice of naming opposing classes that can all be generalized “as oppressor and oppressed”1, will finally be a practice lost to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Alienation from work that is exploitive to their existence, and separates them from a sense of self leads to desire for revolution. Furthermore, as the sustainability of the bourgeoisie system is unreliable the class system will collapse. The proletariats will seek a way to be self-sufficient for their own well-being and their own humanity. This revolt will lead to a communist society. Finally, instead of the gap between the bourgeoisie and the proletariats expanding to the point of proletariat collapse the proletariats will find a humanity among themselves to form a new society. The life the labourers lead does not allow them to satisfy a sense of humanity that is imperative to existence, and they will reject dehumanization. Upon this rejection they will seek ways out of it, and this will finally result in the demolition of a capitalist…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1). The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, the bourgeoisie class controlled the manufacturing system and established “new conditions of oppression” to control the proletariat (Marx, 159-160). Therefore, a class struggle existed and it was worsening for the proletariat class as the bourgeoisie were “constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society” (Marx, 161). However, for Marx, the exploitation of the proletariat for capital will not continue as the bourgeoisie are digging their own graves by continuing to oppress the working class (Marx, 169). Also, in contrast to Nietzsche who says that the slaves are weak and hopeless, Marx does not consider the proletariat as inherently weak. In fact, Marx is clear in stating that the “fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” especially with the increase in the proletariat’s revolutionary consciousness (Marx, 169). Furthermore, to showcase that the proletarians are capable of responding to the bourgeoisie class through occasional revolts, Marx suggests that the proletarians “form combinations (trade unions)” and these will serve as “permanent associations” to riot against the bourgeoisie class (Marx, 166). Therefore, since proletarians are oppressed by the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie state, and are enslaved by the machines, Marx suggests a revolution that will physically re-constitute society or result “in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Marx, 159,…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This document highlights the struggle between the capitalist and the working class. Marx believed that society is made up of two classes the bourgeoisie, those who own the means of production, and the proletariat, the mass of workers who do not own the means of production.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might question why the Communist Manifesto is relevant today and whether or not it applies to society as we know it. It is easy to get caught up in the distinction of two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, as being the primary make-up of society. While this might have been true in the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx believes that the working class will overthrow the ruling capitalist class. During the Industrial Revolution in England, the two classes that become defined is the bourgeoisie, which are considered middle class and the proletariat, which are the working class. The modern industry and large capitalists took over small businesses owners, and these groups of people become part of the working class. The proletariat class is large in size compared to the bourgeoisie therefore; wages decrease for manual labor workers while profits increase for capitalist. He believed that the influence of the capitalist extended beyond where the good is produced and into many countries because this is the only way for them to increase their profits. The proletariat class will form trade unions in order to fix their current work conditions, low wages, and long workdays. Marx anticipated that a revolution would occur and the proletariat class would become the only class after the fact. Marx and Engels, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This quote represented the fact that after the revolution there would only be a single class…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx described what would be the rise and fall of capitalism, a series of revolutions between classes. The proletarians, the lower class, would rebel against a society ruled by the bourgeois, the upper class. Anton Chekov depicted the beginnings of a proletarian revolution Marx described on a small scale in “An Upheaval”, the lack of respect between people.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx Oppressor

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx succinctly describes the history of society in terms of class struggle as “oppressor and oppressed. “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman” and now the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, all which stood in constant opposition. The bourgeoisie is the “oppressor” in this case, being the social class who own the means of production and are concerned with withholding capital and wealth to ensure their economic supremacy.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A key social theory existing in modern day history is that of Marxism. Marxism refers to the political and social theory developed by Karl Marx in the 19th Century, which explores class relations in history. This theory was influenced heavily by industrialisation, as Marx was living in Britain during a time where the industry was booming and the economy was becoming dependent on it. As the industrial development had a major impact on improving life for most of the lower class, Marxists developed as a result of a want to discover more about their past. The core concern of Marxism is to look at those in society dubbed ‘the working class’ and to gain a better understanding of their role in history, and the struggle between them and the richer class. The…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx tries to examine the oppression workers were going through in Europe, especially on the unequal distribution of wealth under the capitalistic system. He proposes a way through which the proletariat class can wage a revolution against the ruling bourgeois class to win social and economic equality. Marx views history as a struggle of classes, such as master and servant and bourgeoisie and the working class (1998). He proposed that as the lower class gained power, a new class would emerge to subsume the old upper class with an emergent of the merchant class and a working class. As the working class eliminates the rest of the classes, there would be no need for class struggle without trappings of class welfare, for instance nation-states, money, and governments.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1848, a sudden wave of coups swept across Europe as masses of people in country after country rose up against their governments. Coincidentally, this was the same year Karl Marx released Communist Manifesto, the end of which declares: “Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!” Why did Marx’s words grip the oppressed working class of Europe like they did? Why did it drive them to such extreme measures? Why did one man’s writings so drastically influence and possibly even ignite the entire socialist movement of the next century? The answers to these questions lie not in the words themselves but in the ready…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Marx, capitalists exploit workers for their labor without sharing any labors equally. Hence, the exploitation occurs; it is what allows the owning classes to dominate and impose their ideology politically on the workers around the world (Garner and Hancock 2014). Furthermore, with Friedrich Engels, Marx claims that “A capitalist society is a society of class inequality, like most societies that preceded it in history” (2014:39). Indeed, the class of capitalists, which is also known as bourgeoisie, particularly enrages Marx. It is said that members of the bourgeoisie “own the means of production” and “exploit the class of laborers” which is called the proletariat; of course, they do not own the means of production as reported in Garner and Hancock’s study (P. 41). Marx, in addition, believes that the bourgeoisie and the proletariat inescapably were “accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class” (p. 44). From my perspective, Marx gradually predicts that the laborers are destined to overthrow the capitalists. Inequality then affects people and knowledge. That is why Kenneth Allan (2012) concludes in his book, Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World, regarding Karl Marx’s class conflict that: “Private property and slave labor came into existence, as well as significant class inequality” (p. 79). As the class struggle later on nears the…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first preamble of the manifesto; ‘Bourgeois and Proletarians’, the authors explain the capitalist mode of production that is associated with conflicts between classes. The Bourgeois exploit and oppress the proletariat through competition and private ownership of property, including land. However, the capitalist mode of production becomes incompatible with the exploitative and oppressive relationship, contributing to the proletariat leading a revolution. On the contrary, the revolution will be different from the previous class relationships in that the new ruling class will not be driven towards reallocation of property. Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays