Satre's Conception Of Humanism: Man Is Condemned To Be Free

Improved Essays
The Merriam Webster dictionary defines condemn as a sentence to punishment or to declare to be reprehensible, wrong, or evil. Jean Paul Satre stated, “Man is condemned to be free,” the use of the phrase initiates that Satre sees freedom for man as an inconvenience rather than a blessing. His main reasoning behind his point of argument is once man is able to live in this world, he or she should be responsible for their own actions. Satre also believed humans live in anguish and existentialism is a humanism supporting his reasoning as the punishment for man is freedom. Satre did not believe in God therefore, there was no particular or certain way a human being should live. Every single individual makes their own choices and their own choices …show more content…
Satre is an atheist philosopher that agrees that humans should take the responsibility for their own actions. I assume that Satre focuses more on the negative consequences of being a free human race with reason and the choice to choose. The opportunity to choose your own actions is based on your own consciousness. The conception of humanity for myself is optimistic because I feel the human race is kind and loving. The choices I have made have not only benefited myself, but others as well. The conception of humanity is based on perspective and opinion of your own choices, life and experiences. Satre for example can see the reality for human race to be free, therefore he knows the evil and immoral than the moral. As for myself, I have chosen actions that are kind and important for my success and others as well. To be able to see the conception of humanity that emerges optimistic, it is important to be accepting of the choices you and others have made. The lack of acceptance for choices made will result in a negative approach of human race. Every single man will see the humanity differently, but it will be based on their own choices. Freedom of will is an opportunity and a blessing, in my perspective it the greatest blessing ever given to mankind. Humans have the right to change, create, destroy and destruct. Our own choices as human’s effects everything …show more content…
We were only given freedom of will. Human race made itself from the choices we have all chosen as of right now. We as humans should be responsibility for our own actions as Satre believed. We are the only living things that can choose, the power is in our hands to create, change or destroy. The conception of humanity is optimistic because our choices benefit other people and the consciousness of man is to take responsibility and notice who it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What is a worldview? 1. A worldview is the social system from which we discover reality in order to grasp its significance. This includes any religious opinions, principles, values, or philosophical system which provides a methodology to understanding the world and human beings.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries philosophers have been debating the concepts of free will and whether it exists or it’s a mere illusion. Over the years, many different theories have been hindering the answer behind this complex concept. Many different philosophers discuss different ideals such as compatibilism and determinism. Both the combatalist and the hard determinist feel there's no escaping fate, however there differences lies on one major concept — free will. Even though an individual's fate may remain fixed, the compatibilist view concludes that humans still possess free will.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans do not have free will. Humans can not make a conscious decision without it being affected by their past experiences, or the beliefs they were taught at a young age. Humans strive towards the idea of being able to make their own decisions and set their own path in life, but in the end, everything you do, is a product of past events. People want free will because we want to be unique. The idea of making your own decisions and being able to separate yourself from everyone else is what some people base their lives around.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan Are we free? - Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments - P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    From my perspective when Sartre stated that “Man is condemned to be free” he meant that we are responsible for our choices and ethically and morally right or wrong, without pardon. That is the thing that I mean when I say man is sentenced to be free. Censured, on the grounds that he didn't make himself, yet is by the by at freedom, and from the minute that he is tossed into this world he is in charge of all that he does”. When we mention freedom it’s great because we can make our own choices that influence the outcome of our life but with choices we take on a deeper responsibility that sometimes causes unhappiness, therefore, causing condemnation. According to Sartre doesn't worship God.…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The notion of free will is what makes us human. What separates humans from animals and in the case of Americans free will is what defines our country. Staring in the face of determinism people cling desperately to the belief that they hold the power over their own destiny and the choices they make are unique and spontaneous. Michael Gazzinga abandons free will in his book Who’s In Charge: Free Will and the Science of the Brain.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy Vs Hedonism

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the other things we want from life is to make our own decisions about it. The power to guide our life through our own free choices, even if sometimes costs us our happiness. Autonomous choices don't always lead to happiness. Things can go wrong; we make free choices that can lead to damaged relationships, financial disasters, or missed opportunities. Still, we need only imagine a life without autonomy to see what a tragedy it would be.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work ( Existentialism is Humanism), Sartre, one of the most influential figures in western philosophy emphasis free will and work from every aspect to prove the absolute freedom of decision of a human beings. Perhaps Sartre was influenced by the historical events of his time, or, perhaps he was defending existentialism as a philosophical perspective. But what matters is that in the end, Sartre puts freedom of choice first and last. To demonstrate or to prove per se this freedom of choice and decision, Sartre utilizes ethos, pathos and logos by using personal stories, using inductive reasoning and employing several analogies.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of years ago, philosophers began to argue about the existence of free will. Free will is a power of acting without restraint of fate. People started questioning whether free will exists or if it is merely imagined. Do humans have control over their actions, behaviors, choices, desires and emotions? Some philosophers believe that human have self-control over their actions, and others say that there is no such a thing as self-control.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “True, we have evolved to be social animals with both positive and negative traits, demonstrating strong tendencies for cooperation and altruism as well as conflict and violence” (Banaji and Greenwald 124). This quote is derived from Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People, and gives insight to the larger meaning of the text. There are many lessons that one can take from this book including that humans live in a world full of mindbugs, which can be described as “ingrained habits of thought that lead to errors in how we perceive, remember, reason, and make decisions” (Banaji and Greenwald 4). One can also learn that we live in a world of categories, and these categories create ingroups and outgroups. Going even further, these ingroups and outgroups create stereotyping between opposing groups.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fate vs free will in Hamlet and Oedipus Outline Introduction: Fate can be defined as “a power that determines the event in the future. In the fate the events of man are already determined.” What is freewill? “The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one’s own discretion.”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans think that we have free will, but how free are we actually. When you make a choice you think that it is free will. But really that was what you were supposed to choose all along. We all have a path that our lives will follow no matter what we do. Now are we still free?…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays