The logic of liberal internationalism has been around since the 18th-century; however, it was not a popular belief until the following century (Bell, 2017). Based on the text, Logics of American Foreign Policy, written by Patrick Callahan, it states that the heart of this logic is cooperative multilateralism. In other words, this logic focuses on the idea of nations coming together with a common goal to deal with other global issues. Liberal internationalists think that by helping other nations solve their problems that we could essentially protect our national interests. One of the national interest pertains to the idea of a new global agenda. This global agenda, as defined by a special study done by the State Department in 1992, are “transnational
…show more content…
From an article titled, The end of liberal internationalism, written by Herbert London, he states that this order would be threaten by a “diffusion of power and the complexity of world politics.” In the article, he continues on with reason why liberal internationalism is failing. For starters, the Chinese have increased their military presence in the South China Sea. There is also the issue that the United States has not had much luck in getting the Middle East to follow a more liberal view. The Russian President Vladimir Putin is also attempting to keep liberal views away from his “geographic periphery” (London, 2016). London even mentions how the European Union is “fractured.” His reasoning for this statement is based on a few factors, such as “the departure of jobs to Asia,” and the issue of “migrants from Africa and the Middle East have resuscitated nationalistic impulses.” London then goes on to mention that there is a belief that the United States is no longer an active partner. These are just a few of the problems that have affected the role of the liberal international …show more content…
John Ikenberry, in his article titled Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order, mentions several reasons why liberal internationalism has failed and could continue to fail. To begin with, he mentioned that throughout history there have been different ideas pertaining to the liberal international order. He points out three major versions, Liberal International Order 1.0, Liberal International Order 2.0, and Liberal International Order 3.0. Woodrow Wilson established the first order shortly after World War I (Ikenberry, 2009). One issue that Ikenberry points out is that this order primarily dealt with private internationalism of banks and commercial firms. Both of which seemed to struggle to cooperate due to the effects of a “contracting world economy” (Ikenberry, 2009). In the second order of liberal internationalism, Ikenberry mentions several issues that has, and still is, leading to its failure. He mentions issues such as, the alteration of the hegemonic logic after the cold war, the rise of unipolarity, state sovereignty leading to powerful states being able to intervene in domestic problems of weaker nations, struggle over the sources of authority in the international community, changes in the sources of insecurity, and growth of world economy creating new stake-holders (Ikenberry, 2009). With the last order, which has not fully
From an article titled, The end of liberal internationalism, written by Herbert London, he states that this order would be threaten by a “diffusion of power and the complexity of world politics.” In the article, he continues on with reason why liberal internationalism is failing. For starters, the Chinese have increased their military presence in the South China Sea. There is also the issue that the United States has not had much luck in getting the Middle East to follow a more liberal view. The Russian President Vladimir Putin is also attempting to keep liberal views away from his “geographic periphery” (London, 2016). London even mentions how the European Union is “fractured.” His reasoning for this statement is based on a few factors, such as “the departure of jobs to Asia,” and the issue of “migrants from Africa and the Middle East have resuscitated nationalistic impulses.” London then goes on to mention that there is a belief that the United States is no longer an active partner. These are just a few of the problems that have affected the role of the liberal international …show more content…
John Ikenberry, in his article titled Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order, mentions several reasons why liberal internationalism has failed and could continue to fail. To begin with, he mentioned that throughout history there have been different ideas pertaining to the liberal international order. He points out three major versions, Liberal International Order 1.0, Liberal International Order 2.0, and Liberal International Order 3.0. Woodrow Wilson established the first order shortly after World War I (Ikenberry, 2009). One issue that Ikenberry points out is that this order primarily dealt with private internationalism of banks and commercial firms. Both of which seemed to struggle to cooperate due to the effects of a “contracting world economy” (Ikenberry, 2009). In the second order of liberal internationalism, Ikenberry mentions several issues that has, and still is, leading to its failure. He mentions issues such as, the alteration of the hegemonic logic after the cold war, the rise of unipolarity, state sovereignty leading to powerful states being able to intervene in domestic problems of weaker nations, struggle over the sources of authority in the international community, changes in the sources of insecurity, and growth of world economy creating new stake-holders (Ikenberry, 2009). With the last order, which has not fully