Neorealist Theory Of International Cooperation Essay

Great Essays
In this paper, I will expand the Neorealist argument that international cooperation is unlikely due to the constraints of anarchy, and that cooperation will only occur when two states face a common threat. I will also present the Neoliberal argument that holds international cooperation as difficult, yet likely, so long as institutions are in place to lower transaction costs. From a Neorealist perspective international cooperation is highly unlikely. Neorealists assert that there is no overarching authority in the international system. The only major actors in international politics are sovereign states. Due to the lack of higher authority to protect these states, they are forced into a self-help system. Under anarchy, states are thought to be alike in that they share the same goal: to pursue security and survival in a system which guarantees neither. As a result of this central goal, states are assumed to be unitary, rational actors whose behavior follows predictable patterns in pursuance of survival. The method by which states attempt to guarantee their security and survival is through the accumulation of power. By accumulating …show more content…
Neoliberals argue that the Neorealist view of the world holds best when there is low interconnectivity between states. However, when there is high interdependence, states come to share a wide range of interests in trade, environmental protections, and a range of other issues. Thus, Neoliberals contend that international cooperation is likely to occur because it is in a state’s self interest to do so most of the time. However, they share the sentiment of Neorealists that cooperation is difficult under anarchy. The primary difference between the two is that Neoliberals have confidence in the power of institutions to lower transaction costs and help states

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All governments are created to maintain a certain degree of order. Some governments allow each citizen an equal opportunity to participate in political outcomes. Other governments restrict the ability of citizens to have any influence over their nation’s rule. Both cases fall within the scale of government types: from oppressive regimes to anarchist factions. Although these types can differ dramatically, the same goal of all governments remains alike.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to examine Robert Gilpin’s, The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations as well as Robert Cox’s, Gramsci and International Relations Theory: an essay in method. Gilpin’s theory that transnational actors and processes are dependent upon specific patterns of inter-sate relations (Gilpin, 1971, p.404) will be compared and contrasted with Robert Cox’s understanding of Gramsci’s hegemony and how it may be adopted to understand problems of world order. Gramsci’s concepts were all derived from history, through his own interpretations as well as from personal experiences and as such, are quite abstract in thought. Meanwhile, Gilpin’s views are easier to comprehend and have more evidence to support them. It will be…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These are Schumpeter’s liberal pacifism, Machiavelli’s liberal imperialism, and Kant’s liberal internationalism. One of the key arguments made here is that the differences among these subcategories is the result of theorists’ differing ideas of the citizen and the state (Doyle 1986, 1151). The baseline of liberal pacifism is that people are “rationalized, individualized, and democratized” (Doyle 1986, 1162). Liberal imperialism, on the other hand, relies on imperial expansion, as people are constantly in fear of other states and therefore seek to be the ruling elite. The final subcategory, liberal internationalism, states that people are “rationalized and individualized,” and see people as moral equals (Doyle 1986,…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Keohane and Martin would like to assert that institutions are actually perfectly suited to function in both because of their capacity to handle information. Continuing to pick apart Mearsheimer’s view of institutionalist theory, Keohane and Martin prop up institutions as the answer to the problem of cooperation. As institutions are designed to relay information, Keohane and Martin assert, “institutions can mitigate fears of cheating and so allow cooperation to emerge, so can they alleviate fears of unequal gains from cooperation” (Keohane & Martin, 1995, pg. 45). In this light, institutions appear to the perfect solution to Mearsheimer’s claims that states have difficulty cooperating in response to fears of cheating, and unequal gains. By becoming the neutral common ground through which to share ideas and handle information, institutions are painted as the perfect conduit through which to get states to overcome short-term goals in favor of realizing more beneficial long-term…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1914, Europe erupted into a conflict now referred to as World War I, which led to the deaths of over 38 million soldiers and civilians and becoming the ninth most deadliest conflict thus far in human history. With such death and destruction seen through this 4 year international conflict, a variety of international relation theories have arose trying to determine the causation of the war; of the theories that have arose, Neorealism and Neoliberalism seem the best at explaining the conflict. Of these two theories, I believe that Neorealism best explains the war aspirations of both the Allied and Central Powers. Beginning on the theory of Neoliberalism; it begins with a theory in which states are self interested players willing to cooperate…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of Internationalism has been one of major debate recently as the formation of the United Nations ( U.N), and European Union (E.U), as well as advancements in technology, have brought us closer together. It is the belief of former U.N governor general Kofi Annan, that internationalism is the next logical step for humanity; that we should put aside parts of our national interests, for the good of humanity as a whole. Kofi Annan's view come from that of an internationalist, he believes that the next political step is that of a world government; that the world should change into a more interconnected society, isolation amongst nations leads to undermining and sabotaging others in the name of one's nation. In his mind national…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, Stephen Krasner expands on neoliberal institutionalism views towards global economics. Krasner defines two controlling variables for an economic system – state preferences and system structures. State preferences include aggregate income, social stability, political power, and economic growth. All four of these portions of state preferences relate the openness of a state to the respective aspect. For my argument, I will focus mostly on aggregate income and how it benefits the member states.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Panos Kammenoss

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The neoliberal world order established in the 1980s under the leadership of President Ronald Reagan and his British counterpart Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has been ever expanding, or so people seem to perceive. The world that these visionaries saw was meant to unite all nations into one system, and yet, despite the USSR’s implosion in 1991, there has been an increased sense of nationalism throughout the world; no other entity exemplifies this more so than the European Union. Since the end of the second world war, there was a continued effort to create a more interdependent and united Europe, so as to avoid another bloody conflict such as that one. Beginning as the European Economic Community in 1958 then rebranding as the European Union…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neorealists are more pessimistic in their view that cooperation is unlikely unless it is essential to the security and survival of a state; cooperation may take the form of balancing against or bandwagoning with a state that is posing a threat. Instead of viewing cooperation as an unlikely occurrence, Neoliberal Institutionalists consider cooperation a tool to advance a state’s own interests of economic gain. Both theories are an attempt to make sense of the international system and analyze how states behave within the anarchic…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens appreciate that the benefits of trade can be enjoyed under conditions of peace. Liberal philosophers, beginning with John Locke in the seventeenth century, saw great potential for human progress in modern civil society and capitalist economy, both of which could flourish in states which guaranteed individual liberty (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that states should cooperate for resources. Liberalists believe that individual’s share many interests and can thus engage in collaborative and cooperative social action, domestically as well as internationally, which results in greater benefits for everybody at home and abroad (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that an increasing interstate cooperation thus brings the best chances for development and peace.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that works to prosecute individuals who have committed heinous crimes, like genocide and war crimes. The organization was established in 1998 and became a fully functioning organization with the implementation of the Rome Statute in 2002. From the beginning of the organization; African countries have served as valuable members of the International Criminal Court. Many African leaders pushed for the organization’s founding and today over thirty African nations are members (Roth). However, in recent years, Africans have become restless with the International Criminal Court with some nations, including South Africa, threatening to resign or outright…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    World Systems Theory Essay

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Wallerstein's World Systems Theory is one of the many influential theories that has shaped the social sciences in the late 20th century. First proposing the theory in his 1974 book, The Modern World System, Wallerstein sees the concept as not a theory, but as part of a larger “knowledge movement” that “[rejects] social science categories inherited from the nineteenth century”, aiming to construct a new approach to social science (Wallenstein 2013: 1). This new approach conceptualises inter-state relationships in the global economic system as part of a larger “world system” instead of unilateral or bilateral behaviours, argues that historical and contemporary events must be view over the “long term”, and emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays