Why Gmos Should Not Be Banned Essay

Evolution is the theory of development from earlier forms. Genetically modified organisms, also known as GMOs, can originate back to ancient nations when they began manipulating different organisms to appease their needs. Today more than 75% of the world’s food is attributed by GMOs, yet only 37% of Americans agree that they are safe to eat. The biggest misconception between scientists and the public is actually over GMOs: 88% of U.S. scientists say genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Since the public is reluctant to dive into details, they are easily swayed by weak arguments about the ethicality of GMOs. They reject the idea of GMOs based on an innate sense of disgust; people tend to see genetic modification as a contamination of food, and then impulsively believe that the food might be hazardous when, in fact, many studies show that GMOs are safe. Due to the health benefits that genetically modified organisms provide, it is unrealistic and detrimental to society …show more content…
Ridding the creation of GMOs is impossible and the potential it could bring can assist the U.S. in the long run. GMOs save money, time, and effort. Opposers of GMOs may argue that health and contamination is a huge factor as to why GMOs are bad for citizens. However, studies show that there is no correlation between diseases and reactions in relations to GMOs. In addition, environmental benefits as well as nutrition bonuses cancel out these proclaimed health concerns. Since about 75% of today’s foods attribute to GMOs, eradicating all types of GMOs would leave the world in a detrimental state. This would require the U.S. to spend more money on growing newer and more organic foods. GM products will help feed the extra 2 billion people that will fill the planet by 2050. Not utilizing these tools will inadvertently stall production for the next 40-50