The Law Of Peoples By John Rawls Summary

Improved Essays
John Rawls’s was an American moral and political philosopher. His book the ‘Law of Peoples’ was orginally published in 1993 but was revisted and expanded in 1999. This book is of particular significance as it played a key part in encouraging others to think about and explore different models of global justice. This book causes many questions to arise soon became prominent in discussions including; What should we transition to a more of a just World? What are the principles that should guide international action? What kind of foreign policy is consistent with liberal values? Should global inequality be morally disturbing? What responsibilities do we have to the global poor? Are there types of non-liberal people who should be tolerated? Is a “realistic utopia” possible in the global domain? https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-global/
Rawls argues that a “Law of Peoples” developed by a “Society of Peoples” can bring a realistic utopia. It is a political conception of right and justice that applies to the principle and norms of international law and practice among people. There are two key parts: “Theory of
…show more content…
Rawls also assumes that each people has a state. In the Law of Peoples John Rawls talks about eight principles that he thinks should be the foundation of international relations and states that these principles should guide and regulate international interactions of peoples. These eight principles are of the utmost significance as they give value and importance to peoples’ equality and independence, they honour and follow human rights along with duties of non-intervention, they should abide by treaties, and ought to conduct themselves in certain ways with regards to warfare. Rawls also believes in an international institution like the UN that govern borrowing, trade, aid as well as other international

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls wouldn’t see this as a just society because Socrates had his own ideas and was killed for them being denied his liberties. Therefore, if Rawls two principles of a just society was the Athenian way of life, Socrates would have never fell in the predicament he did because he was entitled to his…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article, “Americans want to live in a much more equal society, they just don’t realize it”, the author, Arely, use Rawl’s justice perspective to explain his argument. Arely argues that In the United States, we underestimate the inequality that goes on in our society and in the system overall. He also argues that “we want much more equality than both what we have and what we think we have.” This means that we are not living in a country that meets our wants and needs. He explains this by using the data that he has gather from surveys.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder. With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon. After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls’ “Theory of Justice” was one of the first formulations of this type of reflective equilibrium as he proposed that individuals under the “original position” would construct their version of justice through WRE. Under the “original position”, individuals weigh their moral judgements and considerations in an effort to choose among competing principles and construct a feasible conception of justice for which people could easily…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles Mills Democracy

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This, he writes, is a hypothetical situation where political decision makers are rational, do not care about the affairs of their peers, have a sense of justice and what is good, and operate under a veil of ignorance. It is this same hypothetical veil of ignorance which is both the most important element to this theory working, but also what breaks it. Under a veil of ignorance, those making decisions on behalf of society will not know who they are going to be in said society. This, Rawls states, leads them to make moral decisions which, if anything, work to the advantage of the least fortunate. Unfortunately, as effective as this may actually be in addressing the issues with democracy today, there is no real way to carry this out in the real world.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This society would be much more generalized, rather than being catered to each individual’s own situation. Rawls believes in justice as fairness, meaning that a just society is when everything is ‘fair’ for its inhabitants, although it can be uncertain what ‘fair’ really is. Rawls also believes that everyone in society should be concerned about each other’s wellness, looking out for each other and encouraging each other to do what is right, rather than what is wrong. Rawls idea of the original position and the veil of ignorance is meant so that any individual can understand the perspective, since every single person would be unaware of their circumstances in…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rawls then goes on to describe what it means to be a citizen in his ideal democracy: “First, citizens are free in that they conceive of themselves and of one another as having the moral power to have a conception of the good… they regard themselves as self-originating sources of valid claims… they are regarded as capable of taking responsibility for their ends.” What he means by all of this is that citizens must act by their own free will in order to pursue their perceptions of “the good,” but they should still be able to adjust these aspirations in lieu of justice and social cooperation. In short, Rawls argues…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Rawls’ Theory of Justice, he thinks of Justice as Fairness. Rawls’ thinks the distribution or redistribution of goods is fair, in my opinion, this would depend upon the situation. It’s also stated in Justice as Fairness that “Justice should not be based on Luck of Birth”. Another exert in his text states that the “Veil of Ignorance guarantees that justice will be achieved by the least well-off”. Although some of the things Rawl’s speaks of in his Theory of Justice could possibly be achieved, I beg to differ.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays