Athens Vs Rawls Research Paper

If ancient Athenian society followed the conception of justice idolized by Rawls, would Socrates find himself in the predicament that he faced in Crito? The answer to that question, is absolutely not, because of how those principles are set.
The first principle of Rawls states “Each person is to have an equal right . . . similar liberty for others.” This principle dealt with people’s liberty. These liberties were entitled to everyone and always remained. He believed basic liberties can be limited but, that only meant for the sake of liberty. To avoid harming the liberties of others. Rawls, second principle states “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so . . . offices open to all.” This principle focused on social and economic issues. He agreed with the idea of equality amongst all. He believed a just society needed ways to reduce inequalities in certain areas. Rawls first principle held priority over the second. Rawls, believed these …show more content…
Socrates, states how there is a social contract existing between the laws and the citizens of Athens. The laws educated Socrates, birthed him, raised him, and shared wealth amongst his fellow citizens. Leading to the age of manhood, citizens have the right to think for themselves. They are entitled to reviewing these laws and choose if they want to stay in Athens submitting to these laws or leave taking their property elsewhere. Socrates had his time to leave freely but, he chose to disobey the Laws of Athens which made him guilty as charged leading to his death. Rawls wouldn’t see this as a just society because Socrates had his own ideas and was killed for them being denied his liberties.
Therefore, if Rawls two principles of a just society was the Athenian way of life, Socrates would have never fell in the predicament he did because he was entitled to his