I am here to discuss the reasons why the individual would choose to pick life without possibility of parole in the case of a robber killing a store owner and being charged with 2nd degree murder.
With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon.
After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public. It is not the death penalty because the decision is ethical and it’s for the greater good because justice is being served in a humane way.
John Rawls Concept
The Concept of Rawls was he wanted to question society on social justice regardless of social status. He wanted to see what people would do if they have just a case with no information regarding oneself only the case. According to Mazzeno …show more content…
Don respects the laws and punishment because his child upholds the law and standards in society, which will deter people from breaking the law. According Minnesota Statues (2015) intentional murder means the cause of death of a human being with no intent to effect of a person but without premeditation. Unintentional intentional murder means the cause of death of a human being without any intent to effect of a person but committing or attempt to commit a felony offense other than sexual conduct. With both of these situations the state of Minnesota has decided that a person found guilty of 2nd degree murder can’t be imprisoned for no more than 40 years. This will deter people to not do the crime of second-degree murder because the sentencing will take up the majority of a human
With the case of the individual jury person one of the things about him is that one of his children is in law enforcement, this little amount of evidence shows why he would choose life without parole is because he respects the law and the punishment of the judicial system, defendant shown as a threat to society and he had a weapon.
After the veil of ignorance the position is still the same because we believe that the defendant will be a danger to society and needs to be locked up from the public. It is not the death penalty because the decision is ethical and it’s for the greater good because justice is being served in a humane way.
John Rawls Concept
The Concept of Rawls was he wanted to question society on social justice regardless of social status. He wanted to see what people would do if they have just a case with no information regarding oneself only the case. According to Mazzeno …show more content…
Don respects the laws and punishment because his child upholds the law and standards in society, which will deter people from breaking the law. According Minnesota Statues (2015) intentional murder means the cause of death of a human being with no intent to effect of a person but without premeditation. Unintentional intentional murder means the cause of death of a human being without any intent to effect of a person but committing or attempt to commit a felony offense other than sexual conduct. With both of these situations the state of Minnesota has decided that a person found guilty of 2nd degree murder can’t be imprisoned for no more than 40 years. This will deter people to not do the crime of second-degree murder because the sentencing will take up the majority of a human