Appendix A
Mike believes that ethical leadership is possible in a shareholder focused economy and he believed that company will be ethical which required the top management in corporations with good ethical behaviour and apply ethical rules and regulations. Mike’s decision making is influenced by situational factors. Proximity affect Mike to make judgement as he has little disillusioned his viewpoint due to her daughter. Mike believed that follow the virtuous ways of having ethical behaviour in a company will producing good behaviour. According to Kolberg’s moral development model, Mike is between Level 1 Stage 2 and Level 2 stage 3. This is due to the fierce argument with his daughter who only cares of getting rich quickly and waver his mind-set and Mike is taught Business Ethics and he believed ethical behaviour will produce good behaviour for many years. Mike is egoism because as a business ethical lecturer he believes of ethical leadership but he disillusion because of her daughter.
Jan believes that ethical …show more content…
Mei Hua believes that ethical code of conduct and professional behaviour can work alongside with profit and wealth generation which lead to more moral and ethical business. However, she has accepts the fact that as a professional in accountancy which have had many poor and negative ethical issues happening. Mei Hua decision making is according to ethics of duties theory. As an accountant she has the duties to help the company to progress offshore tax avoidance practices and not her fault. Mei Hua moral judgement also based on Utilitarianism as even she aware of how ethical of some companies but it brings more happiness than harm to this societies. According to Kolberg’s moral development model, Mei Hua belongs to Level 2 Stage 4 as she always worked within strict codes of conduct and strict rules and she hoping other companies can also work abides with these
Mike believes that ethical leadership is possible in a shareholder focused economy and he believed that company will be ethical which required the top management in corporations with good ethical behaviour and apply ethical rules and regulations. Mike’s decision making is influenced by situational factors. Proximity affect Mike to make judgement as he has little disillusioned his viewpoint due to her daughter. Mike believed that follow the virtuous ways of having ethical behaviour in a company will producing good behaviour. According to Kolberg’s moral development model, Mike is between Level 1 Stage 2 and Level 2 stage 3. This is due to the fierce argument with his daughter who only cares of getting rich quickly and waver his mind-set and Mike is taught Business Ethics and he believed ethical behaviour will produce good behaviour for many years. Mike is egoism because as a business ethical lecturer he believes of ethical leadership but he disillusion because of her daughter.
Jan believes that ethical …show more content…
Mei Hua believes that ethical code of conduct and professional behaviour can work alongside with profit and wealth generation which lead to more moral and ethical business. However, she has accepts the fact that as a professional in accountancy which have had many poor and negative ethical issues happening. Mei Hua decision making is according to ethics of duties theory. As an accountant she has the duties to help the company to progress offshore tax avoidance practices and not her fault. Mei Hua moral judgement also based on Utilitarianism as even she aware of how ethical of some companies but it brings more happiness than harm to this societies. According to Kolberg’s moral development model, Mei Hua belongs to Level 2 Stage 4 as she always worked within strict codes of conduct and strict rules and she hoping other companies can also work abides with these