Similarities Between Kuhn And Descartes 'Structure Of Scientific Revolution'

Improved Essays
Reflection prompt #3
Tareque Mehdi
EDUC 800 Ways of Knowing

Imagine a conversation between Kuhn and Descartes: what would Kuhn say to Descartes about his Discourse? Many have argued that Descartes created a scientific revolution. Does it meet Kuhn’s attributes? Why or why not? Additionally, note what specifically about Kuhn’s perspective helps you understand how we come to know?

If I imagine a conversation between Kuhn and Descartes, upon closely looking at their publications, I believe Kuhn would disagree on several of his discourses with Descartes. Using his idea of paradigm, Kuhn helped bring the philosophy of science closer to the history of science. On the other hand, Descartes’ way of knowing is based on experience and influenced by deductive reasoning to lead to the development of ideas. In this connection, Kuhn believed that Descartes caused a paradigm shift in a broad, and historical sense.
René Descartes (1596-1650) and Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) both were innovative philosophers from two different time periods. Their publications ‘Discourse on Method’ (Descartes), and ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolution’ (Kuhn). After reading these, I felt they both had a significant influence on the philosophy of science but with disparate conflicts between their discourses. Descartes spoke
…show more content…
Paradigms must be based on consensus by solving validate or clarify the paradigm. Secondly, Kuhn would not agree that ideas under rigor will lead to truth. Kuhn would agree that Descartes Discourse contributed to scientific knowledge. However, Kuhn would have suggested to Descartes that there are some flaws in his method because Descartes’s rules follow a linear process and Descartes was very systematic in his approach whereas Kuhn would have argued that that paradigms are non-linear but rather undergoes periodic revolutions or paradigm shifts and a transformation occurs within a particular

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The book, structure of Scientific Revolutions, is one of the most famous books authored by Thomas Kuhn. He introduces a wide array of concepts within the essay that explains the course of scientific revolution in the world. However, the essay has received wide criticisms from other scholars especially for what they refer to as his ‘relativistic’ nature. To understand or take a position as to whether the arguments of his charges of relativism are valid, an understanding of the term is necessary, along with its relevance in his essay. As a result, this paper will examine Kuhn arguments to identify his response to the charges of relativism and to infer whether the response was any adequate or not.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newtonian Worldview

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest social scientists, Karl Marx famous for penning Das Kapita, presented a new viewpoint of Socialism on socio-historical development; his worldview has been a tremendous impact to global societies. More evidence is found in a broad sense, Enlightenment was a philosophic movement with emphasis on science and rationalism while Romanticism values arts, religion, minds and morality during the 18th century. Moreover, a view of Modernism contradicts the understanding of Post-modernism viewpoint. Following from that idea, the viewpoint with respect to understanding entire set of knowledge is also critical; there are three…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn’s View on Truth and Science Science is the means of pursuing knowledge about the universe. It is collection of knowledge that is built on the testable predictions. Philosophy of science is a study concerned with fundamentals, techniques and consequences of science throughout time (The philosophy of science). There are several philosophers who tried to identify and differentiate between scientific and non-scientific theories throughout time using different philosophy. Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn are two of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believes that science begins with problems and that these problems occur when something differs from our expectations and reality of it. When this happens, Popper believes we must jump to a solution or conjecture that tries to explain the new criteria. The conjecture will offer a hypothesis that, for example, might try to explain the world in a new way. Popper believes that a good conjecture will make bold moves and take risks by making novel predictions. It is then the job of the scientist to take this new solution and test and submit them through criticism which Popper describes as refutation.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this does not mean that Kuhn rejects completely the falsification principle. Because both philisophers agree that one time falsification is not enough to cause scientists/people to stop believing in a science or a theory. Lastly, I would like to express my opinion based on my reading about critisim of Popper and puzzle-solver science of Kuhn, what Kuhn 's and Popper 's contribution looks more complemantary than contradictory even though Kuhn 's view differs from Popper 's view in many ways. However, this is a subject for a long essay not for short essay. 3.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When reviewing the evolution of my worldview, Howard Zinn’s The Politics of History comes to mind. His book is a collection of case studies and essays that argue for a radical approach to the past. Zinn’s work changed the way I saw my purpose in life. I had originally planned to enter a field in science, despite my passion for history and the Humanities. In an age where the college degree had lost its traditional value, STEM fields seemed to me like the only practical route to success.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The reason for how he had managed to not overcome him being misunderstood is partially to the fact, which he has admitted himself, that he was not able to come across the way he intended too, that what he said wasn’t as clear as to his understanding either. And if Kuhn himself did not understand what he was attempting to explain then how can anybody else? Conclusion Kuhn’s theory has influenced science to this day and remains the leader in his explanation of the progress of science against those of the like of Popper and Lakatos. Those it has been seen that Kuhn’s theory is not without its limitations, mostly brought on by misunderstanding and that he was focusing on the core sciences and not the social sciences that led to his theory not being entirely correct in its explanation. To this day, Kuhn remains the one to hold the title of the best explanation of scientific progress in the history of psychology, to how long will this last, who can…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falsification is the notion that, after a theory is created, a scientist must seek to disprove said theory; through such a process, refinement strengthens the theory as scientists remove more possibilities (Popper 33-39). As falsification theory does not prove that the previous model was incorrect, it provides a less emotional way for researchers to develop new ideas. Likewise, the natural sciences possess specific criteria which must be met before an issue is further considered; this can be seen in the underlying mechanism of the scientific method. An observation results in a hypothesis, and experimentation either supports or refutes the hypothesis. Through such structured methodology, a concept becomes a theory, and a theory can then become a law.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book inspired by the subject of his previous book, The Copernican revolution and the following events. Kuhn developed a theory established upon the nature of scientific progress which he based upon the profound advancements which signal a paradigm shift. Kuhn was an American physicist, historian and philosopher in the sciences. Kuhn’s main following contained philosophers and sociologists of science whose primary are was understanding the nature of scientific advancements and modernism. All that was required to bring upon the period of the Scientific Revolution was educated scholars, who were using the knowledge gained by artisans from the Renaissance who had discovered accurate and detailed knowledge of the physical world.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Paradigm Shift

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People may interpret Kuhn’s theory of paradigm as more assumption than concrete fact. In the article “Normal Science and the Extension of Theories,” the author makes clear that Kuhn was convinced that the paradigm is not necessarily the theory of the new idea, but simply a proposed direction toward the discovery and establishment of a new worldview that comes as a result of the shift in thought. As detailed on page 243 on the “Diffusion of Innovations”, Kuhn infers that scientific revolution occurs when big ideas are discussed and unusual ideas are proposed once the existing science is found to be flawed and cannot be fixed using the science accepted. When Aristotle had formulated his beliefs, it was based upon minimal experimentation and more observation of the physical reality. As he strictly believed the earth was at the center of the universe, the rest of his postulates followed quickly behind, depicting a specific view that would otherwise be false if sufficient evidence or explanation is not…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays