Katz V. Charles Katz

Decent Essays
Facts
In 1967, Charles Katz used a public telephone in Los Angeles, California in order to place illegal gambling bets. Not only was he placing bets over the phone, he was placing the wages to individuals in Boston and Miami. While he was placing the bets over the phone, Katz was unaware that the Federal Government, also known as FBI, was conducting an investigation through the electronic collection data. After the conversation, Katz was arrested and apprehended by the FBI. Katz cited that the FBI had violated his personal privacy and private settings.

Procedural History
At the trial, Katz objected to the introduction of evidence of the telephone conversation. The trial court allowed the evidence. The court upheld the conviction, holding

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dustin Hoffman v. Los Angeles Magazine An article entitled "Grand Illusions" in the "Fabulous Hollywood Issue!" of Los Angeles Magazine in March 1997 featured several famous film stills altered such that the movie stars appeared to be wearing spring fashions. The scenes included Cary Grant in “North by Northwest,” John Travolta in “Saturday Night Fever,” Elvis Presley in “Jailhouse Rock,” ), and Marilyn Monroe in "The Seven Year Itch.” The final image was a play on the legendary image of Dustin Hoffman posing in front of an American flag from the 1982 film “Tootsie,” but Hoffman was depicted in a Richard Tyler butter-colored silk gown and Ralph Lauren heels instead of the original red long-sleeved sequined evening dress and high heels. One month later, Hoffman filed a $5 million lawsuit against Los Angeles Magazine's owner and publisher, Fairchild Publications (which is owned by Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.), alleging that the photograph misappropriated Hoffman's name and likeness in violation of the California common law right of publicity, the California statutory right of publicity, the California unfair competition statute, and the federal Lanham Act.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel Holtzclaw's court case has been going on for weeks and today they finally came to a verdict. This ex-Oklahoma City police officer was charged with 36 various counts including sexual battery, stalking and more. After 45 hours, the jury finally came to a decision on December 10 and Holtzclaw was found guilty on 18 of the 36 counts. This jury obviously took their time making up their mind. Once they started trying to decide, they were not allowed to go home and took breaks only when it got really late at night, but then started over again in the morning.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calder Case Summary

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Calder V. British Columbia Attorney General [1973] SCR 313 Calder case is a pacesetter for aboriginal jurisprudence in Canadian supreme court. It is the first to recognize that aboriginal title to land exist as a sui generis type of right in Canada at the time of time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763 and does not devolve from the colonial, Crown law, treaty or statute. The main issue for determination in this case was whether Crown authority lawfully extinguished the aboriginal title to the ancestral land occupied by the Nisga’a tribe that pre-existed at the time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763. The case was ended as a deadlock, the court split three to three in favor and against the appeal, while the seventh judge dismissed…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Horsky V. Korematsu

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Korematsu’s advocates Wayne M. Collins and Charles A Horsky used Writ of Habeas Corpus to challenge the legal basis of Korematsu’s imprisonment, its duration, and the conditions of arrest and confinement. As a result of this legal challenge, a court order requiring Korematsu’s presence at trial and valid reasoning for his imprisonment was granted to the agency currently holding him. Furthermore, Korematsu was brought to court he questioned the constitutionality of executive order 9066, arguing that his 5th amendment rights were violated. The petitioner noted the meticulous gathering and transferring of all Japanese-Americans, innocent or guilty, from their residences without due process of law, citing General DeWitt’s consecutive orders…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Gibbons Vs Ogden

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The second case that has established the power of the federal government by Supreme Court is Gibbons v Ogden. In this case the state of New York give Aaron Ogden exclusive license to operate steamboats ferries between New Jersey and New York City and he sued Gibbon for using the same route. Gibbons argued that New York does not have the power to regulate interstate commerce. The legal question in this case does New York have the authority to regulate interact commerce.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Name and Citation: Brewer v. Williams 430 U.S. 387 (1977) Previous courts and their rulings: Trial Court denied motion to suppress holding that Defendant waived his right to an attorney. The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed. Defendant then filed a writ of habeas corpus in a US District Court., which was granted, Court Appeal affirmed this conviction using the inevitable discovery doctrine, meaning that the confession did not affect the other evidence, as it would have been found anyway, inevitably. Facts of the Case: Mr. Williams, the defendant had recently escaped from a mental hospital and was staying at a YMCA in Des Moines where a 10-year-old Pamela Powers was last seen.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1908 a case, Muller v. Oregon, came before the U.S. Supreme court. The issue at hand was whether or not Oregon’s limiting women’s work days to no more than 10 hours per day violated the 14th Amendment. The court found in favor of the state of Oregon in that the 10-hour work limitation was not a Constitutional violation. A similar issue had been brought before the court in 1905 in Lochner v. New York.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Evidences- where the case went wrong: According to the file there was just one evidence against Morton and that evidence was a note found at the crime scene. That note was signed with “I L Y,” for I love you, and “M,” for Michael, who was Christine’s husband. (Bazelon, 2012). That note was all about a husband’s anger over his wife as she did not let him have sex with her at the night of Morton’s birthday.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (TOPIC SENTENCE) What would you do if you were affected by severe bullying? (BACKGROUND) Jamie Nabozny from Ashland, Wisconsin had to deal with this from middle school to almost the end of high school. He was openly gay and at the time the thought was “Maybe you shouldn’t be so openly gay”, so that was quite unusual which as a result enabled others to make fun of him to empower themselves.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this case Philips relied on the valuation that Stamp Champ made and the fact that the stamp was not damaged, in order to buy it. Because of the intentional or unintentional failure to disclose this material fact about the stamp Phillips lost $7800 that he paid for the stamp. If Phillips can prove that Stamp Champ knew about the water damage done to the stamp and decided not to disclose this to him at the time of the sale it constitutes Fraudulent Nondisclosure. In the case that he can’t prove that Stamp Champ knew about this fact, he can try to win the lawsuit for Negligence. A victim of Fraud is entitled to recover the amount of money that he or she lost, any legal fees that had to be pay during the course of the lawsuit, and in some cases…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ADJUDICATORY HEARING ORDER PENDING DISPOSITION Upon consideration of the evidence presented at an adjudicatory hearing, and with the following persons present:  Respondent Marquise Ramon Bailey  Respondent’s Attorney Leslie Florestano Peek  Assistant State’s Attorney Kue M. Lattimore The Court for Prince George’s County on this 9th day of April, 2015, accepted the Respondent’s plea to Count 7 – Motor Vehicle Theft. The Court found that the Respondent freely and voluntarily entered the plea and knowingly and intelligently waived his rights. The State presented the following facts, which would have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, if the case had proceeded to a full merits hearing: •On November 20, 2014 at 2300 hours,…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An important aspect of this case, is that Judge Kaufman identified and considered that the act’s application is qualified by due process requirements. It concluded that in terms of personal jurisdiction, states are considered “persons” under the due process clause . With this determination, when there is a suit under the FSIA, courts will have to find minimum contacts of the foreign state with the US territory in order to establish personal jurisdiction . This was later, highly criticized by jurists and eventually overruled.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case The Supreme Court Case of The New York Times v. the United States was about how freedom of the press overcomes the prior restraint of the government when there is no catastrophic event to the safety of the armed forces. The Nixon administration tried to use prior restraint on the New York Times from printing out more newspapers on the Vietnam war and the classified study called, "History of U.S. Decision-Making on Vietnam Policy. " It was not only the New York Times that had printed out the papers on the Pentagon papers, are the information on the Vietnam war, but also The Washington Post. Supreme Court's Decision The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Newspaper companies in a 6 to 3 vote among the Supreme Court Justices.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays