Kant's Explanation Of The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
In conclusion, as discuss the theory of Kant shows logical explanation about the death penalty. Using Kant’s theory it shows under what case and conditions that death penalty can be morally acceptable. However, utilitarianism sees death penalty as morally unacceptable because it will not provide a greater happiness to everyone. For Kant, death penalty will prevent crimes to happen in the society while utilitarianism perceives it was ethically wrong to kill someone whatever he/she have done.
Although death penalty can help to create a better society where people do not have fear to live in their environment, in my opinion, it is still not acceptable to remove the right of someone to live. Maybe they committed heinous crimes and hurt innocent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my own opinion I believe the death penalty should be abolished. I think if they are already found guilty then they should serve a time even if it is a life sentence. I understand that there are some people who are found guilty of murder or many unimaginable crimes but I believe the death penalty is an easy way out. I also believe that maybe the evidence used in court could be non-substantial and easily make a wrongly accused person granted a death penalty. There are cases today where wrongly accused people are serving long term sentences and some found not guilty in a re-trial.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Death In Texas Summary

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ending a life, because of a crime is not moral. The convicted criminals don’t learn anything from it. Instead of death row, they could receive jail time and talk to people about the consequences of committing crimes. In some cases, innocent people have been sentenced to death row. It is not right to give someone power to kill someone. The court system doesn’t want to see themselves as murders too, but they are. Opposers may say it is moral because the person won’t be able to commit the crime again, but I believe prison fits the bill just fine.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment or simply the death penalty, is usually the harshest sentence reserved for those who have committed such reprehensible acts that they warrant death. In justifying punishment, there has been significant discourse regarding a retributive point of view and a consequentialist one. Retributivists, such as Immanuel Kant, posit that punishing those who have done wrong is justifiable because we are merely giving them what they deserve in return for what they have done. On the other hand, consequentialists assert that punishment is justifiable as it brings about positive consequences such as crime deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection. In this paper, we will primarily examine the Kantian approach to capital punishment as well as its objections, followed by the consequentialist view as a secondary response in formulating a more comprehensive view of its justification. However, we will conclude that while both Kantian and consequentialist approaches are able to provide some justification of capital punishment, they are unable to account for the flaws in the penal system, and thus the death penalty should not…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are multiple counter arguments to Kant when it comes to capital punishment. His main argument is against deterrence and for retribution. He mostly rejects the…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people in the United States have opposing views on Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty. The death penalty is the process in which, convicted criminals are executed by a governing authority. Many other countries have abolished capital punishment but the United States still allows for this to happen in certain states. The death penalty is used for most terrible crimes such as murder, treason, or espionage but mainly for murder. Many people argue about whether Capital punishment is ethical, moral and even legal. I will cover the history, supporters and opponents, The Divine Command Theory and Kant’s theory for capital punishment.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of capital punishment has in the last decades attracted a heated controversy, due to its extensive use and the severity with which it has been inflicted, especially on murderers. Death penalty has become the ultimate punishment for criminals, due to the reason that no punishment for such people is harsher than death itself. Currently, more than fifty countries across the globe practice the death penalty, with the United States included (Jane & Sidney, 2006). Capital punishment has become the preferred form of punishment for persons who commit first-degree murder, with the hope that such a serious sentence will reduce the number of murderers. However, although some people fully support the death sentence penalty, others are completely…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be legal in all states. The death penalty is a punishment that fits the crimes committed. Prison life is too easy and gives too much freedom to criminals who commit terrible crimes. The death penalty provides true justice for victims and closure for their families.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As mentioned in this paper, death penalty violates the most important article of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Moreover, wrong judgment in the process of capital punishment leads to the condemnation of innocent individuals. Furthermore, Camus argues that it should not be a legitimate sentence since it does not prevent murders, no crime is worth death penalty and finally because no State, no human or no society have right over a human being since they are not absolutely innocent. Lastly, capital punishment should not be within the law because the argument of Kant of the law of retaliation is a barbarous way of resolving problems. Abrogating death penalty is a step toward a better and just…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant starts Metaphysics of Morals with the definition of crime and the right to punish those who commit crimes against society. In his opinion neither a society, nor a state can exist without laws. If there are no laws, there is no society and no state, but only anarchy. Therefore enforcement of the law, which is the core of a society's foundation, means the protection of the society and the state. Any person violating a law loses their right to be a member of society. So if said person opposes social order, they consequently must be deemed guilty and punished. The right to punish a person is only the right of a ruler and it is only his right to make violators and criminals suffer. It is impossible to punish the ruler himself since he…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This semester we have discussed many topics and the different views on them. One particularly interesting topic for me was capital punishment. In the argument of capital punishment we saw the deontological and utilitarian view. Referring to deontological ethics, we looked at Kant’s theory, which says that is only ok to intentionally hurt someone if acting on a maxim. On the other hand, a utilitarian believes that if punishing someone would produce a greater amount of happiness than unhappiness then it is justifiable.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Kant's belief the death penalty is acceptable only when the crime concerns murder, unless a crime causes significant harm to a society, such as lese-majesty. It is intolerable to permit a circumstance where a murderer would be allowed to any legal rights or the ability to validate his actions. Kant thinks that we cannot realistically replace the death penalty. If capital…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is permissible. It is morally permissible to punish those who cruelly take the life of an innocent person through the means of capital punishment. Those who take the life of another with willing malicious intent deserve a punishment that it equal to the crime they committed. Death is the only form of punishment that can come close to matching the heinous act of depriving another the life that they deserve. Anything less would allow a murderer to receive an easier sentence than the one he willingly distributed. A murderer denies their victim their natural born right to life and as a result forfeits their own right to life. Once one has no grounds to claim their right to life it is morally justified to use capital punishment.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays