Kant's Explanation Of The Death Penalty

Decent Essays
In conclusion, as discuss the theory of Kant shows logical explanation about the death penalty. Using Kant’s theory it shows under what case and conditions that death penalty can be morally acceptable. However, utilitarianism sees death penalty as morally unacceptable because it will not provide a greater happiness to everyone. For Kant, death penalty will prevent crimes to happen in the society while utilitarianism perceives it was ethically wrong to kill someone whatever he/she have done.
Although death penalty can help to create a better society where people do not have fear to live in their environment, in my opinion, it is still not acceptable to remove the right of someone to live. Maybe they committed heinous crimes and hurt innocent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment has been around for hundreds of years and was brought to America by the Europeans in the early 1600s; The first recorded death being back in 1608. Back in that time the Death Penalty was used in many cases from thievery to murder, making it the social norm during that time. Though in today’s society, capital punishment has been deemed by some as inhumane or morally wrong. In some ways it’s become a political issue in which a higher percentage of Republicans favor the death penalty more so than Democrats.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is appropriate in deterrence of that criminal that they will not commit again. The death penalty is also deterrence for those wanting to know the consequences of their actions and if the legal system imposed the death penalty on all murder crimes then murder rates would fall. The death penalty is just that and that’s what it was put in place for is to deter others from committing the same crime. By allowing states to abolish the death penalty then we are allowing for more murders and more crime to be committed because the fear of death is now…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Abortion Cons

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I agree that the cost of having someone on the death penalty and putting someone through it is very expensive but for a the victims families it can be the only form of closure available to them. The death penalty is also said to be too “harsh” of a punishment but I think if a criminal murders someone or rapes someone then that is totally justifiable for the death penalty. Of course the extra time and ridiculous cost of the death penalty is frowned upon, but I do think that the version of the death penalty can be vastly improved…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant starts Metaphysics of Morals with the definition of crime and the right to punish those who commit crimes against society. In his opinion neither a society, nor a state can exist without laws. If there are no laws, there is no society and no state, but only anarchy. Therefore enforcement of the law, which is the core of a society's foundation, means the protection of the society and the state. Any person violating a law loses their right to be a member of society.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is permissible. It is morally permissible to punish those who cruelly take the life of an innocent person through the means of capital punishment. Those who take the life of another with willing malicious intent deserve a punishment that it equal to the crime they committed. Death is the only form of punishment that can come close to matching the heinous act of depriving another the life that they deserve. Anything less would allow a murderer to receive an easier sentence than the one he willingly distributed.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, we will conclude that while both Kantian and consequentialist approaches are able to provide some justification of capital punishment, they are unable to account for the flaws in the penal system, and thus the death penalty should not…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To think someone deserves to die may sound absurd to some of us, but is it really that absurd. Humans have their own approach to the concept of the death penalty, just like the philosophers that have their own philosophy about the death penalty. Some philosophers are for the death penalty like, Immanuel Kant, who is in favor of it. Then, there are some philosophers like Paul G. Cassell that found the death penalty incomplete, because of its unfairness to African Americans. The goal is to state the mentioned philosophers beliefs and their reasons to why they believe in their beliefs while inputting my own reasons on why I agree or disagree with them.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several debatable issues that face our society today, and one of these issues is capital punishment. Also referred to as the death penalty, this issue involves the question of whether it is moral or immoral to kill humans who have been found guilty of a horrible crime, which in most cases is murder. I will defend my position that capital punishment, though immoral in most cases, can be moral in special instances by starting off with addressing the matters of retribution and justice with regards to capital punishment using Kantian and virtue ethics, respectively. Sequentially, I will highlight two objections to my position involving the issues with cost and inhumanity and innocence and offer responses. My first argument begins with…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people argue about whether Capital punishment is ethical, moral and even legal. I will cover the history, supporters and opponents, The Divine Command Theory and Kant’s theory for capital punishment. Executions were practiced as early eighteenth…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays