Importance Of Kant's Ethics

Superior Essays
Kant’s Ethics- Morals, Happiness, and Human Life Kant’s Ethics is a work that reflects how Immanuel Kant perceived ethics through morals and happiness and painted a picture of human life through these things. Ethics is what is defined as things that guide a person’s actions or their behavior. In Kant’s Groundwork, he discusses morals- what we consider to be right and wrong, and how we feel or duty, good will, or inclinations influence our morals which in turn influence our actions. Another thing that is crucial in Kant’s ethics is the role of happiness- are we selfish all of the time or do we ever want to do for others? Through morals and happiness in Kant’s Ethics, Kant paints a picture of what human looks like from this perspective. In …show more content…
It becomes very obvious as the reader reads through the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that selfishness and dutifulness are enormous components of Kant’s view on ethics. Kant’s view remains the same throughout all parts of his Groundwork… that being selfish is not considered moral and that doing things from a dutiful mindset can make all of the difference in a moral action. Just as a dutiful mindset can turn bad quickly so can happiness. As mentioned earlier, people would like to think that they do things for others to make themselves happy but more times than not they do for themselves to be happy. Happiness really all depends on how you let yourself go about it. Kant remains consistent in his thinking about morality and happiness throughout everything discussed in the first two sections of his …show more content…
As the reader reads through the different sections, Kant continually makes statements regarding how humans can be so selfish and sometimes they do not even realize it. Although Kant paints this picture of a selfish human life, he also paints a vivid picture of a life of a dutiful and truly helpful human being. In the first section of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant continually reminds the reader that doing actions from a sense of duty and truly wanting to help others is what gives the feeling of true morality and happiness. Many different philosophers over time have studied and proposed many ideas of human life and how it should be and how it could be done, and they have all varied slightly from one another. For example, Aristotle focused on happiness and pleasure, and some have focused on a human’s responsibility and identities. All of these perspectives have shaped the way that human life is expressed but Kant’s perspective focuses on a deeper perspective. In Section 2, Kant says “On the contrary, if we attend to experience of people's conduct we meet frequent and, as we ourselves admit, just complaints that no certain example can be cited of the disposition to act from pure duty; that, though much may be done in conformity with what duty commands, still it is always doubtful whether it is really done from duty and therefore has moral worth. Hence there have at all

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chan Dr. Whitman Phil 1301 1 May 2017 Kant Paper Immanuel Kant was a man of knowledge and self-awareness. He was well known for the development of ethical formulas in his book Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. One important formula that will be introduced is the Humanity formula. When using this formula, Kant explain why or why…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s, “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, the morality of action is questioned, defined, and explained. To do so, Kant brings up an example of several people, two of which either, “preserve their lives”, or, “act charitably” out of pure, “natural inclination” (Kant). The other two are performing the same actions, but, in stark contrast to the other two individuals, are acting because of a, “motive of duty”, or maxim (Kant). Kant explains that those who acted out of duty are only deserving of moral status for their actions, and those who acted out of impulse do not. After much deliberation, I have agreed with Kant’s perspective of what comprises a moral action.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian ethics forces people to honour each other’s values and morals, and not overstep them for their own gain. I would want to live in a world in which each man and woman respects the needs of each other. It would be nice if everyone could just have happiness, but as a consequence of what? The leaders or Russia tried implementing this kind of principle, making everyone equal and everyone happy, ignoring the consequences it took to get there. Lenin started in the 1920s by treating everyone equally, be redistributing land and wealth throughout Russia.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that autonomy and rationality are the reason why we are part of a community. We have to be conscious of our decision as well as the consequences. Contrary to utilitarianism which try to include people even though they are not autonomous or rational. To them, being capable of feeling happiness is enough to be a part of a community. Both theories have pros and cons, but ultimately they provide us with new interesting that will help us develop the best theory to describe moral status and…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People intrinsically feel as though they must repay those around them for helping them find their freedom and autonomy. Kant theorizes that out of good will toward others, people uphold their moral duty and do not take emotional factors such as pride and satisfaction into account. This leads into the main point of Kant’s perspective, that the action itself determines morality rather than the outcome that is achieved. By being faithful to their duty to their communities people retain their autonomy and act on their freedom, which reinforces Kant’s definition of humanity. The individual is being moral for the good of everyone involved, including themselves.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant argued that the most important part of morality is a standard of rationality. With this being said he created something called the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative has three major formulations. Of relevance to this essay is the second formulation: “Act as to treat humanity, whether in your own person, or in the person person go another, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end. ”(Dieser, 2017)…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the strong view, it holds that Kant believes the motives for a morally right act have to be solely motivated by duty with no inclinations what so ever. Its moral value lies in the fact that when an action is done from duty it is determined by the formal principle of volition. The purposes one may have for doing the action and their effects as ends and incentives of the will cannot give the action any moral worth. On the weaker view, it holds that morally worthy actions are motivated in part by duty but among other motivations as well. Kant claims that duty is the necessity of an action executed from respect for law.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from Königsberg in Prussia (today Kaliningrad, Russia) who researched, lectured and wrote on philosophy and anthropology during the Enlightenment at the end of the 18th century. Kant published other important works on ethics, religion, law, aesthetics, astronomy, and history. These included the Critique of Practical Reason 1788, the Metaphysics of Morals 1797, which dealt with ethics, and the Critique of Judgment 1790, which looks at aesthetics and teleology. In his book on ethics, Kant has propounded his theory on morality and how it affects our decision making in our lives.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea of moral equality refers to all autonomous, rational beings or persons as moral equals. In other words, all moral equals are all equally tied together by the moral law. Therefore, individuals should act based upon respect for the moral law. This view of Kantian theory implies that all moral equals should treat individual’s as ends in themselves. As stated in the textbook “Persons are autonomous, rational beings who have goals or objectives that they wish to achieve.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays