Kant's Objection To Kantian Ethics

Improved Essays
In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.

In Kantian
…show more content…
What this objection is that if there is a murderer at the door should you tell him the truth if he ask you if you have seen the person he is looking for. Naturally the answer to this question would be no to most people, but to Kant he looks at it differently. What Kant argues is that if there is a murderer at the door you have a moral obligation to tell the truth to the murderer if you have seen the person or not. Kant argues this by talking about good will and how you act based upon reason also if it morally correct to lie to the murderer at the door. Kant explains to us that we have a moral duty to tell the truth and to not lie because if we do lie then we our not acting morally or fulfilling our duty to tell the truth. Kant also talks about maxims and how you see yourself acting on this situation by lying but also knowing that you if you do then you are acting immorally.Reason vs. desire these are the two ways in which you make decision. Kant discusses that reason is the same for all rational creatures which is why you might think letting the murderer know that you have seen the person is crazy but actually isn’t. Kant also uses FEI as an argument to people who think you should lie to the murderer at the door as well. He does this by saying when lying to the murderer at the door you are using the other person merely as a means and by doing this you violate IC or informed consent. When violating FEI it proves that your action is not morally correct and that even though there is a murderer at the door you should tell him that you have seen the person he is looking

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the relationship between subjectivity and identity (Pages 3-5)? Subjectivity and Identity often refer to one’s sense of being. The relationship between identity and subjectivity often displays people’s sense of being and ideologies.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He said that “lying under any circumstances is the obliteration of one’s dignity as a human being” (Rachels 131). In defense of his position, Kant offers two arguments for an absolute rule against lying. He relies on the categorical imperative theory. He claims that we could not will a universal law that permits lying, because such a law would be self-defeating and everyone would lie to each other and as a result, they would lack trust on each other. Therefore, he concludes that lying cannot be permitted.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Kant you cannot tell if an actions is good just by looking because moral duties should come from reasoning, which determines the will (makes you do the things that you do). Moral truths are not received from a high through divine revelation or…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One individual’s responsibility ends where another person’s responsibility begins. Kant claims that the liar attempts to manage the consequences, ignoring interests of other people and affecting the future determination of events. Therefore, the liar takes the full responsibility of the consequences caused by his lie, however in knowing all of this people still choose to take the risks associated with lying (Korsgaard, n.d.). Discussing the problem, Kant initiates the casuistical problem, the so-called issue of a lie to the murderer at the door. In the ‘Metaphysical Principles of Virtue’, Kant argues that lying is a violation of a perfect duty to oneself.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This law prescribes that rational, autonomous agents should only perform actions that would maintain their function if adopted universally. If one were to tell a lie, they would be conforming to the rule that “Lying is acceptable.” Such a rule would prove to be self-defeating in the context of universality; lying would lose its purpose since everyone would expect deceit and be cynical of one another. As a result, Kant argues, lying should never be acceptable. One may be inclined to argue that rules should have exceptions and specific circumstances of forgiveness.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How does Kant’s theory apply? Will the professor handle the situation correctly? (ND)In the article, Alice Cheung: The Case of the Cheating Student, the professor has to make an ethical decision regarding his suspicions about a cheating student.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Divided Loyalties A 4 year old girl suffers from severe renal failure. She fails to thrive on dialysis, she needs a kidney transplantation soon or she will not survive. If the kidney can be transplant of a close relative that matches in tissue type the success rate of transplantation is 90%. If the tissue match is less close, even from a close relative the success rate is way less, like the same odds as for a poorly matched cadaver kidney.…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advances in medicine and technology have allowed physicians the ability to prolong and sustain life but there are certain moral implications present in cases where the patient has either a terminal illness or is in a pertinent vegetative state (PVS). Withholding or withdrawing treatment is a major ethical dilemma for an incompetent individual’s family and healthcare providers. Most people have not completed an advance directive or much less have appointed a healthcare power of attorney who can also make decisions regarding medical treatment in the event that the individual becomes unable to make those decisions for themselves. Having advance directives can help alleviate some pressure during a stressful time when the doctor and family are unaware…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that human life should be respected and regarded as both a means and an end. The Formula of the End in Itself states to treat “humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end”. When a person is involved in a scheme of action to which they could not in principle consent to, they have been used as a mere means. When there is no consent, the person has been used as a mere means.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Kant's categorical imperative- Kant is worried about what is morally right. One example is being stuck in a line with an indecisive individual at the head of the line. To speed up the process one could consider hurting that individual to get them out of…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to ethics there might be many idealisms, but three big ethical standpoint are Utilitarianism, liberalism, and Kant’s conception of morality. Each one of these has it’s points that make it stand out and each disagrees with the other. But which ethical standpoint fits best when it comes to Pharmaceuticals? Utilitarianism was first developed as an ethical standpoint by Jeremy Bentham.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We should never lie. Kant is a philosopher who thought there are absolute moral rules in the world. He thought that never lying is one of the absolute moral rules, and he offered arguments for it: 1. You should only do things that you are willing to adopted to be universalized. 2.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Age of Enlightenment, writers and philosophers in Western Europe published works focusing on individualism and its relation to moral philosophy. Immanuel Kant investigated principles of deontological ethics, which relate to duty and moral obligation. In Kant’s work Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals he focuses specifically on the concept of the good will. In his work the reader finds that is a multi-faceted moral concept, that lays the foundation for all of Kant’s arguments. For Kant, a good will is define as being motivated by self-actualized morals with an ensuing action in accordance with moral law.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Lying

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “This means that when you tell a lie, you merely take exception to the general rule that says everyone should always tell the truth” (Groundwork 24). Objectively, a universal law cannot permit any exceptions; else a contradiction ensues. Thus, Kant brings out both the excusatory nature we often place on lying as well as…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays