Analysis Of Kant's View On Duty

Improved Essays
There have always been occasions where a person has acted courageously for a deed they have done. Due to this deed, it is believed that the person should be regarded with moral praises for their bravery. However, if it is found out that the deed is done because they expect recognition, a reward, or they were forced to do so, it seems now that they have acted from improper motives. Society gives moral praises when they see the deed is done out of morally correct motives or good will. Kant believes in good will, which according to him is the only thing that is good in and of itself. Regardless of the ends, separated from subjective wants and desires, the good will is its own end. Kant 's moral theory is deontological, which determines the moral …show more content…
In the strong view, it holds that Kant believes the motives for a morally right act have to be solely motivated by duty with no inclinations what so ever. Its moral value lies in the fact that when an action is done from duty it is determined by the formal principle of volition. The purposes one may have for doing the action and their effects as ends and incentives of the will cannot give the action any moral worth. On the weaker view, it holds that morally worthy actions are motivated in part by duty but among other motivations as well. Kant claims that duty is the necessity of an action executed from respect for law. He explains that it is possible to have an inclination to an object as an effect of the proposed action, but that there cannot be respect for it because it was simply a mere effect and not an activity of a will. Even though Kant states that there can be no respect for any inclination, he does not rule out the fact that he can still at most approve of it and eventually maybe even love it or see it as a favorable …show more content…
I do not see humans capable of alienating all the natural inclinations they experience in order to perform an act out of pure duty. It is a part of human nature to assign affection, love, anger, etc., to the people and things they encounter during their life. Kant regards emotions as irrelevant and the fact that the only appropriate motive for moral action is a sense of duty creates a conflict with our instincts of emotion that accompany our daily actions. We also may doubt whether it is even possible for us to set aside our self-interest and the concerns and desires that make us individuals, and to think of ourselves, as Kant wants us to, as purely rational autonomous beings that subdue our desires and inclinations in order to act only out of duty. I believe that by removing these natural emotions we experience from performing a moral act it takes away from the value. I view the moral worth of an action as more valuable when a person acts out of not only duty, but from their desires to perform the action because it shows they truly want to do

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the relationship between subjectivity and identity (Pages 3-5)? Subjectivity and Identity often refer to one’s sense of being. The relationship between identity and subjectivity often displays people’s sense of being and ideologies.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the story, “A Horseman in the Sky”, of a young man’s decision to join the union military, which eventually lead him to a precarious circumstance; which he found himself confronted with an ethical and moral battle. A young Virginian man confronted his father with the news that he would be joining a military regiment in the state of Grafton, with this news the father, reluctantly, accepted the boys decision. The father, calling his son a traitor to the state of Virginia, added, “Should we both live to the end of the war, we will speak further into the matter” (pp. 98). The son departed soon after, and due to the broad knowledge of the landscape of Virginia soon found himself highly praised in his new military role fighting against the very state in which he resided. While resting following an extensive journey, the sentinel was awoken with an unsettling certainty; in an interesting twist of fate the…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a person makes a decision based on the moral law, then they are considered a “good” person in Kant’s eyes. He believes that doing the right thing acquire “good…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with Hume's argument, “morality is sentiment”, because sometimes, my feelings impact my actions and my attitudes. Depending on my feelings, I do things differently than I would do when I am emotionally stable. If it is asked right or wrong, I would say it is wrong because we live in a society where rules are required to obey and follow whether we have born naturally evil or have born good and pure. We can understand someone's action in the view of Hume's but we cannot justify his or her action.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant states that an action has moral worth if and only if it is done from duty and does not merely accord with duty. The concept of duty, to Kant, contains the concept of the goodwill because in the case of humans like us, action from duty is…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Nature of a Meaningful Life Thomas Mann's Mario and the Magician is about a family who took a vacation in one of the beaches in Italy. For the purposes of this paper, the nature of a meaningful life will be analyzed based on the article, with Kant and Mill as sources to defend such analysis. Desires, Emotions, and Moral Choices Kant believed that desires and emotions do not play an essential role with how a person rejects or embraces morality (Kant, Abbott & Denis, 2005). In fact, morality should not be influenced with desires and emotions because in itself, morality is a sense of duty. As such, actions which are guided by morality do not seek for rewards but instead, such actions seek to fulfill a duty, which should be considered…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The good will in the act of duty is “good with-in itself”. Kant describes ethics as action as any sort…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explains how to tell if something is done from duty or from a self-seeking purpose. Actions can be seen as good when they are done for duty only not inclination. The second proposition, he brings up how actions are not to just be attained, but in the maxim that is the reason for the action. The third proposition which Kant mentions is a consequence of the other two. This…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics