Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Morality

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from Königsberg in Prussia (today Kaliningrad, Russia) who researched, lectured and wrote on philosophy and anthropology during the Enlightenment at the end of the 18th century. Kant published other important works on ethics, religion, law, aesthetics, astronomy, and history. These included the Critique of Practical Reason 1788, the Metaphysics of Morals 1797, which dealt with ethics, and the Critique of Judgment 1790, which looks at aesthetics and teleology.
In his book on ethics, Kant has propounded his theory on morality and how it affects our decision making in our lives. He set forth his Supreme Principle of Morality which was based on three interlinked theories and concepts that he created.
In his first formulation he talks about a universal moral law. Kant holds that moral questions are to be decided by reason. Reason, according to Kant, always seeks unity under principles, and ultimately, systematic unity under the fewest possible number of principles. He says that making any decision based on morality, it
…show more content…
These decisions should be based on laws of morality and reason. Through autonomous will one gives a law to oneself, a law made by his own reason and sensibilities. It is then one’s duty to follow this law. Kant says that autonomous law is above all other inclinations; even natural necessities should not hamper this will. People should make rational decisions using their autonomous will and all their moral actions should be based on their reason. In a situation where you have to decide, whether to stay in the library and study for a test or go and eat lunch because you are hungry; you should chose the course of action that is most rational and true to your duty. If you go for lunch while your will actually is to study, it is a violation of your autonomy even if lunch is a natural

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Therefore, right or wrong depends solely on the principle of volition by which the action has taken place, without regard to any object of desire. This identifies the individual as the author of moral law. Because of this, Kant believes we should have to ask ourselves two questions1 before we can act morally: Can I will that everyone would act the same in this situation? And Does my action respect others or am I merely using them for my own purposes? These two questions can help one determine if their individual moral law stands up universally.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Kant, deciding what is moral or immoral is based on how the individual acts regarding the Categorical Imperative. Being consistent with what the Categorical Imperative…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In addition, the principle of autonomy is to obey our behavior to principles that express of the rational will and ought to be followed along with universal…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality as used in the context is defined as the principles revolving around the differentiation between wrong and right behavior of the human. As the last thinker of the enlightenment, Kant was a philosopher that believed that reason was the only thing that morality can come from. In contrast Mill was a philosopher who believed that morality is utility, meaning that something is moral only if it brings happiness or pleasure. In looking at both Kant ’s…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant is a phenomenal philosopher whose works has shaped the nature of western philosophy. He has made profound contributions in metaphysics and ethics through academic articles like The Critique of Pure Reason, which has intense knowledge on topics like what man can possibly know. I. Kant challenged the concept of suicide. a. Kant believed in human autonomy and believed that freedom has paramount importance taking precedence over life itself. i. One should believe the reason, because one has duties to perform regardless of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of a situation.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher renowned for his revolutionary metaphysical and epistemological theories, and for his very strict deontological moral theory. The latter stressed the absolute or “exceptionless” nature of moral rules, together with the irrelevance of consequences or feelings in the assessment of moral judgments. As a strong deontologist Kant opposed to all forms of consequentialism. He also opposed to any type of non-cognitivist in ethical theory, particularly the form advocated by the 18th century Scottish philosopher, David Hume, who view moral judgments as expressions of a special kind of “moral sense” or “sentiment”. According to Kant, morality is not concerned with the expressing our feelings.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    During this paper I will discuss Kant’s ideas on moral freedom. I will also discuss the defense of these ideas in the face of three critiques by Andrew Ward. I will then conclude with my remarks and thoughts upon the subject matter. Kant was a firm believer in moral freedom. Kant proposed that we have moral freedom through two different worlds.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the paper I argue that the act of stealing bread for survival of your family is morally unjust based on Kantian ethics, the contradiction between actions lacks the ability for the person to act based on duty, good will, and the moral law. As the basis of my argument, I will reference the work of Immanuel Kant and his theoretical development of the categorical imperative, furthermore, by implementing Kant’s ideas of good will and duty, it will become clear that Kantian ethics withholds a strict rule over the moral reasoning and actions of the individual in a social world. In the beginning sections of this paper I will briefly describe the basics of Kantian ethics, in particular, the categorical imperative and it three main formations, universality,…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is there a moral difference between male and female prostitution? I believe that there is not a moral difference, and both male and female prostitution is morally wrong even if the circumstances are that everyone involved is 18 years of age, it is not a form of slavery, and that there is no more duress than most people encounter in difficult lives. To defend my position, I will use the Kantianism to respect people at all times. Throughout my argument, I will focus on the principles and morals behind the decision to sell yourself for sex, rather than the results that follow the act of prostitution. Kant’s ethical theory states that moral duties are absolute and universal.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays