Moral Theories Of Kant And Mill

Improved Essays
Describe the moral theories of Aristotle, Kant and Mill and how they relate to healthcare.
Every time an individual carries out an act there is a deeply embedded instinct to question whether the action is right or wrong this is influenced by the concept of morality, which is essential in society. This essay will discuss the theories of morality from the perspectives of Aristotle Kant and Mills.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was a thinker and intellectual his position on morality and moral theory is defined by his view Deontological ethics and the Categorical Imperative. For Kant, deciding what is moral or immoral is based on how the individual acts regarding the Categorical Imperative. Being consistent with what the Categorical Imperative
…show more content…
There are four main fundamental principles. Autonomy in medical care is the right of competent adults to make informed decisions about their care. The principle requires staff to seek the consent and agreement of the person before any treatment takes place. Beneficent is an action that will benefit a person these, actions can help prevent or remove harm or improve a patient’s situation. Healthcare professionals are required to avoid causing harm but are also obliged to help their patients. For example, would it benefit an elderly patient with several deliberating diseases to undergo surgery to remove a cancerous tumor and then receive chemotherapy with no guarantee of positive results. This principle can be linked with Non-Maleficence which means to avoid causing unnecessary harm but many treatments do carry the risk of some harm or side effects. That the benefit of the treatment should be greater than the harm inflicted. Sometimes by adhering to these principles medical professionals fail to respect a person’s autonomy. Distinctive justice is concerned with equality and entitlement the right to be treated with fairness and equally with regards to accessing treatments and health resources. This is not always the case in practice other factors including cultural, environmental, social status and disability can impact on equal access as do financial costs and hospital budgets. The Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences recently reported that doctors and other medical staff are increasingly refusing to administer potentially useful treatment for economic reasons (SAMS, 2008). Two more principles that relate to justice are Naturel justice which is a person’s human rights, healthcare is stated as a right within the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” and by the World Health Organization's” Declaration on the Rights of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It is vital that healthcare delivery systems must be fair, ethical, makes sense and must involve a universal standard that everyone should abide by. It should comprise all four chief elements discussed in the article “Improving Access to Healthcare: A Consensus Ethical Framework to Guide Proposals for reform”. I do not believe that one element is more important than the other. It needs to be cohesive and comprehensive. Everyone should have access to healthcare; they must not be discriminated.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There Is No “Right” to Healthcare,” by John David Lewis Thesis: Healthcare is not suitably a guaranteed right for persons because it would infringe on the rights of doctors, is paradoxical, and it goes against the freedoms defined by the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Premise 1: The basis of all rights that are laid out in in the US Constitution are to protect the individual, not the wishes of the society or of other individuals. Requiring a doctor to perform care that other’s wish for would infringe on his or her rights to pursue the career envisioned. Premise 2: It is not right to force one person to act in helping another person at their own expense, even if the other person needs the help to survive.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miss Evers Boys Analysis

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Beneficence is to do no harm to the patient and to ensure patient’s safety (Finkelman & Kenner, 2016). The film did not portray beneficence, because for not treating the patient they are implicating harm to them. In addition, the testing that was done during the study also added harm, risk and pain to the participants. The second ethical principles that was not met in the film is justice. Justice “is about treating people fairly” (Finkelman & Kenner, 2016, p. 175).…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    #1A) In his paper “Rights to Health Care, Social Justice, and Fairness in Health Care Allocations: Frustrations in the Face of Finitude,” H. Tristram Engelhardt makes a distinction between the unfortunate and the unfair. According to him, injuries, disabilities, and diseases arising from natural causes are considered unfortunate. On the other hand, those situations become unfair when brought about by the doing of others. Engelhardt also notes that the result of someone’s unfair action should not be attributed to the society as a whole.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In article “Age Rationing and the Just Distribution of Health Care: Is There a Duty to Die?”, Margaret Battin argues whether medical care has to be rationed by age or not. Before she starts giving her points about the idea, she mentions a few famous historical figures, such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Plato, Euripides, and Thomas More briefly stating their attitudes towards sick and old people. For example, Nietzsche describes sick people, who still depend upon doctors as, “parasites on society” and claim their actions as “indecent” (p. 318). Margaret Battin advocates distributive justice theory as the main idea in her writing, as she analyzes and uses Rawls’ and Daniels’ ideas of self-interest under a veil of ignorance to explain the fact that…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle: 1. “[W]e always choose happiness as an end in itself and never for the sake of something else.” EN 1.7.1097a33–1097b2. 2. “[H]appiness is a certain activity of the soul in conformity with perfect virtue.”…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Among the best characteristic of Kantian moral hypothesis is its consistency: since this hypothesis is principles based and outright, it obliges us to be steady in our ethical…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality as used in the context is defined as the principles revolving around the differentiation between wrong and right behavior of the human. As the last thinker of the enlightenment, Kant was a philosopher that believed that reason was the only thing that morality can come from. In contrast Mill was a philosopher who believed that morality is utility, meaning that something is moral only if it brings happiness or pleasure. In looking at both Kant ’s…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is deemed as important to one person may not be as important to another person. It is not good enough to simply treat patients how you would like to be treated as this can be completely different to how the patient wishes to be treated. Therefor care given should work in a person centred way and reflect the patient’s own values, ethics, beliefs and wishes. If the patient is treated mechanically rather than as an individual this can demoralise the patient causing mistrust, frustration and refusal to consent all of which can affect a patient’s health and well-being. The principle of ethics is to treat the patient fairly, in a non-judgemental, non-discriminatory way.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People have a right to sufficient healthcare. All people should have equal opportunity to obtain health-care despite their social standing or ethnic background. It is morally wrong to withhold healthcare due to discrimination. Daniels argues that the principle of justice demands equal opportunity for all. He states, “Since people are entitled to fair equality of opportunity, and adequate healthcare can protect or restore their normal range of opportunities, they have a right to adequate healthcare.”…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The four principles are beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. The principle of beneficence states healthcare professionals must act in a way that does good by a patient and actively protects the them from harm. Healthcare providers must strive to improve their patients’ health, with the understanding that what is right for one may not be for another. The principle of non-maleficence is simply medical professionals should do no intentional harm to a patient. The principle of respect for autonomy is healthcare professionals must treat the individual as humanly as possible.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics