Comparing Kant's Theories On Morality And Rationality

Superior Essays
The consequentialism ethical theory speculations are basically right, that we ought to be seeking to make to best out of good. The Kantian thoughts of building quality in a self-government or the cooperative attitude that gives the best results of good. In Kant’s theory is focused on Morality and Rationality, what principles people hold on what is right and wrong. The good behavior versus the bad what type of character people betray when dealing with others. A person who is judgmental of others, and make a rash decision could lead to damaging reputations. For those who are capable of being rational could be reliable to a certain degree, but the risk is taken when judging a person, and risk of wrongful moral judging of a person could occur. It may be disputed …show more content…
Notwithstanding, the qualities of deontological profound quality, rather than consequentialism, manages the diverse worries of relative, accomplices, partners, and different exercises. This kind of ethical quality has no value, and on the off chance that it does, it is dependably on the highest priority. Nevertheless, deontological noteworthy quality, rather than consequentialism, leaves space for people to offer anxiety to their families, partners, and activities. The deontological moral quality contains no solid responsibility to any usefulness, yet its commitment is on the highest priority on the list. The Kantian deontological ethical quality, hence, stays away from the excessively requesting and secluding parts of consequentialism and accords more with customary thoughts of our ethical obligations. Among the best characteristic of Kantian moral hypothesis is its consistency: since this hypothesis is principles based and outright, it obliges us to be steady in our ethical

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This being said, I feel as though the outcome of an action does affect its ‘goodness’ even if unknown- consequences shouldn’t be overlooked, therefore I disagree with Kant. Kant (1724-1804) believed that the instructions/moral code we live by should be categorical imperatives not hypothetical…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Ben’s circumstances, and circumstances of similar nature, if he were to act according to Kantian ethics, his approach would begin with carrying out the action that is aligned with a good-will and a moral duty to act. To Kantian ethics, human rationality and the development of the good-will are of central importance. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to recognize the demands of reason, “for reason recognizes the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination” (Marino 194). For Kant, it’s not the consequences of the actions that truly matter, but the motivation of doing them out of a good-will. The only genuinely good actions are the actions done exclusively out of respect for the moral rules.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From one viewpoint, deontological ethical quality, as opposed to consequentialism, leaves space for a person to give extraordinary worry to their families, friends, and daily tasks. In any event, the deontological ethical quality contains no solid obligation of general usefulness, or, in the event that it does, it puts a top on that obligation 's request. Deontological profound quality, in this manner, maintains a strategic distance from the excessively requesting and dissatisfying parts of consequentialism, and more in accord with ordinary thoughts of our ethical obligations. Among the best property of Kantian moral theory is its…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When based off of feelings as for a reward for doing the right thing then it is not morality. The main goal is to fulfill a duty, whether we think it’s right or wrong, whether we get pleasure from it or not, whether we benefit from it or not. In his view, morals are superior to emotions and desires. His theory consist of deontological ethics that are based on character (Kant, p 44). When a person makes a decision based on the moral law, then they are considered a “good” person in Kant’s eyes.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cognitivism Analysis

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant trusted that profound quality did not lay on sense experience as Hume would recommend that moral sayings are determined through the earlier reason, as moral standards aren 't experimental like a utilitarianist would imply, however are vital truths for discerning creatures. Kant not just trusted that feelings had no part to play in the importance of "good" additionally in the route in which the "good" was realized. 'The cooperative attitude sparkles like a gem for its own purpose. ' - Kant. Kant trusted that indisputably the ethical good got from the absolute basic must be carried on simply out of 'obligation for obligations purpose, ' we ought to have no ulterior rationale to do good other than it being the best thing to do, feeling negates with this ethicalness.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Susan Wolf's Moral Saint

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Susan Wolf describes the moral saint as the person whose every action is as morally good as it can be. Wolf summaries’ from this that a Kantian and utilitarian moral saint would be ‘unpleasant and possibly disturbed psychological type’. Throughout essay I will be breaking down this statement, and looking at the qualities of a Kantian moral saint and a Utilitarian moral saint, to see the validity of Wolf’s statement. My personal opinion on Wolf’s argument is to agree with her statement but to understand her argument one must understand what a moral saint is, as it is possible for a divide to come between good motives and good actions between good and honorable character and the ability to perform good actions. Wolf discusses two kinds of…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To answer this, Silber points out that in the Kantian kingdom agents are all good-natured and well-behaved. We may then, appropriately ask: Are these characteristics additional premises or simply the result of agents acting under the moral law? Only the latter would be true to Kant’s ethics. I think Silber’s interpretation is essentially close to Kant’s perspective in so far as maxims derive from moral propriety such as self-preservation or security, rather than moral goodness. As I will precisely discuss this in section of Silber’s procedurlism(2.1.1), I argue although Silber has defended Kant’s ethics against the charge of consequentialism to some degree, he has not done so in an essential way.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, he believed the only motive that can endow an action with moral value is one that arises from universal principles discovered by reason” (McCormick). One must make the right decision for the right reason, or it is not a moral action. Simply doing the right thing is not enough according to Kant’s belief, therefore doing it for the wrong reason is…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believes that the good will is the only good without restrictions. The goodwill is characterized to be “good-in-itself.” He establishes moral decisions on the structure of an agent by good incentives, aspects and appreciation of the law. A moral agent would do a specific action not because of what it creates, as with past experience, but that they will understand by reasoning that that specific action is the morally correct thing to do. The rule that Kant requires for self-sufficient motives and that it applies to everyone is categorical imperative. This gives us a way to figure out moral actions and to make moral reasoning.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays