Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals By Immanuel Kant

Improved Essays
Chan
Dr. Whitman
Phil 1301
1 May 2017 Kant Paper
Immanuel Kant was a man of knowledge and self-awareness. He was well known for the development of ethical formulas in his book Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. One important formula that will be introduced is the Humanity formula. When using this formula, Kant explain why or why not drugs are bad for you and whether they go against the moral standards. In his book, Kant doesn’t necessarily state that drinking is terrible for you and is morally wrong. However, he does explain what the standards of drinking, self-harm, and intentions are.
Kant once explained to a group of students that “Drunkenness is the unnatural state of inability to organize sense impressions according to the
…show more content…
His main point is that you should never be able to make an exception for yourself. Kant has no actual opinion against drinking or drugs, but that you indulge in such should not be something that you can justify doing. We are allowed to use objects as mere needs but not humans. Kant strictly states that “We are not mere objects that exist to be used by others. We are our own ends. We are rational and autonomous. We have the ability to set our own goals and work toward them (Kant 4:416) This imbues us with an absolute moral worth, which means that we should not be manipulate, or manipulate other autonomous agents for our own benefit”. Kant’s Second Categorical Imperative also explains that treating another autonomous agent as mere means to accomplish personal goals or interests is a violation. This is what differentiates between using drugs to accomplish a personal interest and using a human to accomplish a personal …show more content…
Paternalism is the action of limiting a person’s liberty that is meant for their own good. There are a few types of paternalism, Soft and hard, Pure and impure, and Moral and Welfare. Soft and hard paternalism is an action that is justified if the action was committed involuntary. Take the case of someone planning on robbing a bank, soft paternalism would be telling that person to not to kill himself. However, if that person is aware of the consequences that would affect the people around that person then we should allow him to do so (Kant 775). On the contrary, hard paternalism says that sometimes we are obligated as human beings to stop this person. Moral paternalism is saying that selling your kidney purely for money and that you will still be in good health, is not moral. Welfare paternalism would be if someone were to offer you $30,000 for your kidney, you should sell your kidney. It would be a win-win

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The regulation of one's actions characterizes choice as a privilege rather than a right. The authoritative group implicitly…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is okay to drink, but the extreme is an escape to reality. People have to face reality. The problems do not resolve by themselves; we have to do something to make the change. p. 201…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill makes his position on paternalism quite evident as he states that “[the individual] is the person most interested in his own well-being…” and goes further to explain “the interference of society to overrule his judgment and purposes [instances] in what only regards himself, must be grounded in general presumptions and may be altogether wrong.” (Mill p.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What Is Anti-Paternalalism

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Premise Seven: If the agent is culpably ignorant and voluntarily accepts the risk of harm, then anti-paternalism permits intervention. Conclusion: The anti-paternalist’s justification for intervening on behalf of the culpably ignorant agent is actually a paternalistic justification for…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Permissive parenting style is a ‘no discipline’ approach. This style of parenting usually involves emotional warmth but a reluctance to enforce rules. They use reasoning or manipulation to get what they want but they avoid using evident power (Dewar, 2010). Parents that exercise the Permissive style are indulgent and passive and believe that the way to demonstrate love is to give into their children’s wishes. They invoke phrases such as, “sure, you can stay up late if you want to,” and “you do not need to do any chores if you don’t feel like it.”…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main and most important principles of the United States foundation is the protection of peoples’ rights and choices. Therefore, when a policy is drafted that limits these rights, there is bound to be discussion over its paternalistic qualities. Paternalistic public policies are generally frowned upon, but, in rare cases, restrictions have to be put in place to protect citizens’ deeper preferences (living a long, healthy life) rather than allowing them to participate in their surface preferences. Robert Goodin discusses smoking; a rare case in which a paternalistic policy could save many smokers from ruining themselves and why the policy is permissible. He proposes four different reasons as to why making paternalistic decisions about smoking is permissible.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this, the individuals who apply are operating under their own enlightened self-interest with the understanding that their decision would certainly benefit themselves, but also the country. Moral freedom is also evident in the application of this policy as unDACAmented individuals are considering not only the external forces they are subject to, but also their own…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Broken Windows Theory

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Paternalism is the interference of a state or an individual with another person, or in this case the government interfering in the lives of its citizens, under the motivation and justification that those interfered will be better off or protected from harm (Dworkin, 2016). According to John Stewart Mills (1859), the only purpose for exercising powers over an individual is to prevent harm to others and is not warranted to prevent harm to his own good, whether it be physical or moral. Mills considers paternalism to be immoral because it impedes on the individual’s happiness and another could only reason or persuade the individual, not force them, because they are ruler of their own body and mind (Mills, 1859). However, Gerald Dworkin (1972) argued that interference with an individual’s liberty can be justified if it is to the welfare, good, happiness, needs, interest or values of the individual being coerced (p.65). For example, the law requires children to attend school because it is in the child’s best interest to gain an education and gain positive associations with having an education.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1984 the legal drinking age was raised from 18 to 21; Keeping this in mind Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that “people aged 12 to 20 years drink 11% of all alcohol consumed in the United States” (“Fact Sheets - Underage Drinking.”). This rise in age not only blew up within society and media but also created a platform for a new debate over the 21 vs 18 drinking age. A plethora of people all across the nation have joined the debate and added their two cents to the argument. Many sources provide overwhelming amounts of evidence and facts to create a compelling argument that the drinking age should be lowered. One of the issues with drinking is that some individuals have become irresponsible and consume too much in such…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hayek believes in little to no government interference in an individual’s life. Hayek argues strongly against coercion and does not even believe in the use of coercion to prevent greater coercion. Coercion cannot be prevented completely, however, in Hayek’s view it should be as limited as possible. Planned economies are a huge form of coercion, and an example Hayek explains in-depth. The individual in this system has no liberty to the extent that they are dependent on the state.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “STEP ONE: We admitted we were powerless over alcohol–that our lives had become unmanageable, “said in Alcoholics Anonymous, The Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous. In the United States our drinking age is 21, but in reality many people drink way before that. The drinking age should definitely not be lowered, but completely illegal for all because of the emotional distress it causes, the body damage it creates, and also the lives of human beings. First off, humans are very emotional. When a person has had too much to drink they become a different person than when they are sober.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill in his book, On Liberty and Other Essays, believes paternalism is only appropriate when it is towards children, and unnecessary for people in the maturity of their faculties (Web 16/04/2017). He argues against State paternalism based on the premise that “individuals know their own good better than the State does, and on the fact that paternalism disrupts the development of an independent character” (Web 16/04/2017). In a similar way, Joel Feinberg in his book, Harm to Self, believes that paternalism towards adults means treating adults as if they are children (4). However, Thomas Pogge in his book, World Poverty and Human Rights, highlights a number of criteria that could make paternalism acceptable as a principle of meeting the needs of people in any community. For him, general accepted items such as nutrition, clothing, and shelter are under the ambient of paternalism as they are basic necessities of human flourishing (Web…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that human life should be respected and regarded as both a means and an end. The Formula of the End in Itself states to treat “humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end”. When a person is involved in a scheme of action to which they could not in principle consent to, they have been used as a mere means. When there is no consent, the person has been used as a mere means.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays