Kantianism Vs Deontology

Decent Essays
Kantianism or deontology is based on the idea of good will, which is necessary in conceiving all the good in the world. Kant focuses on the nature of an action that makes it right and wrong rather than judging it by its consequences. It encourages actions having moral values that reflect good intentions and purpose. These actions can only have moral values if they proceed from a pure motive of moral duty comprising act of reason. Hence actions are considered virtuous if they tend to justify in righteousness of their motives. This can only occur if they are derived from duty rather than from predisposition. The strongest examples of morally right action are those in which an individual agent's certitude to act in accordance with duty overcomes

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Moral Theory depends on the whether or not you have fulfilled your duty not on the consequences that put back on one’s self. It is all a matter of the motivation behind an action compared to its consequence. For example, one finds a one-hundred-dollar bill on the street. If he is to think I want to do something…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontologist theory bases morality on specific, foundational principles of obligation ((Edges & Groves, 2006, p. 35). For example, it is wrong for parents to not care for their kids even if it results to great benefit like financial savings. Regardless of the overall result or consequences, certain acts are morally right and others are morally wrong. Therefore, the end does not justify the means. Kant formulation is that “a categorical imperative is fundamentally different from hypothetical imperatives that hinge on some personal desire that we have” (Fieser, n.d).…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kantian deontology refers to rights and duties so; ethics involves performing or avoiding certain kinds of actions and respecting the rights of others. Many would say that no matter what the consequences, we have certain rights and duties, for example, we should never commit homicide. For Kant, our reason for acting should always be derived from reason. In fact, for him, a person who acts purely because it is his duty is morally superior to one that does not. Kant’s view on sympathy is that all should be your rational conceived duty than sympathy.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantianism is the opposite of utilitarianism in the sense that consequences of the actions are not the base on decision, rather one chooses to do the right thing, solely in the sake of doing good. Kantianism states that everyone has value and the value of every individual is equal. Kantianism uses The Categorical Imperative to clarify the principle of morality. The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative states one’s actions should be acceptable universally. The second formulation of the Categorical Imperative states that one should treat others with worth, not as a means for motive.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kantianism is an obligation-based theory developed by Immanuel Kant. He did not believe that moral truths should be based on one’s religion or culture. He created a theory he believed would be applicable and followed universally. Kant believed that individuals should be morally obligated to do something because it based on reason and not desires. Stealing and deceiving others is wrong universally, therefore any act where one chooses not to deceive others is done so because it is morally required to do so.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    ID: 300100796 Kantian Deontology is characterized by the view that persons that are rational moral agents have equal value as well as equal worth. This moral theory has four key themes including dignity, autonomy, rationality, and morality. Additionally, the formula of humanity and the formula of universal law are taken into account when making moral decisions; these formulas are a part of the categorical imperative. Kant developed this moral theory as a way to evaluate the motivation for a given action. This theory has many advantageous features that are a result of Kant 's focus on the above mentioned themes.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Someone who supports Kantianism would argue that they are right and say that a person is good because they always do what is right. However, that does not tell the whole story. By no means am I arguing that doing what is right or fulfilling your moral duty doesn’t make a person good, but what makes a person more good is having a good character. A genuinely good person does not do good things just solely because they are required to by law or should do it. They do good things because it is in their nature and they value these…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, some philosophers such as Immanuel Kant hold that moral philosophy is based on the idea of good will, which offers a justified reason for doing what an individual does; that is duty. Further, Kant argued that it is not justified to blame other people for the results of actions they do, because they are beyond their control.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Margarita Rodriguez Philosophy of Nursing Millers College of Nursing October 9, 2015 Discussion Question 2 The word epistemology itself comes from two Greek words ? Episteme? meaning knowledge or understanding and ? Logia?…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the principle of deontology, it is an “approach to ethics focused on duties and rules” (Rich, 2016). From this perspective, violations of duties and rules, or categorical imperatives, are unacceptable regardless of the anticipated outcomes (e.g. shooting an abducted passenger plane is always an immoral thing to do and it violates the moral norm to not kill others) (Gawronski, 2016 ). Kant proposed that people should follow a universal, unconditional framework of rules as a guide to know the rightness of actions and one’s moral duties (Rich,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The good will is the will to do the right thing. Only good actions are the ones you do for respect of the moral rules. Kant has two types of moral rules— categorical and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are prudence than moral. Hypothetical imperatives are good as…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant’s theory of good will could say we should not base our actions off of what produces the most utility for ourselves in fact we should not even focus on ourselves we should focus on the moral duty that we all have. We could hate doing our moral duties; however, it is our moral duty to complete these…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative According to Kant, we should always act according to the individual 's duty, not anticipating any consequences ahead. If each individual act accordingly, I believe that there will be less negative events occur and more positive outcomes. For example, sometimes doing negative things is wrong, such as lying. If we were to lie for a positive outcome, then it proves that if each individual act accordingly, then there will less negative outcome…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays