Characteristics Of Alexander The Great

Better Essays
Embodiment of a True Leader
Exceptional leaders have come from many different backgrounds and have existed in many different time periods, but they always share a few traits that distinguish them from the rest. The same goes for not so great leaders while they may share some of the traits mentioned before by not possessing as little as one of the aforementioned traits they earn their place among the most notorious leaders of all time.
The leaders I will discuss, in chronological order are Alexander the Great, Cyrus the Great, Augustus, Nero, Caligula, and Chinggis Khan. The size of their empire and their military success will not be the only factors considered in their judgment. Instead they will all be subject to identical concepts to determine
…show more content…
to King Phillip II of Macedonia, and Olympias the daughter of King Neoptolemus of Epirus, Alexander the Great was destined to be one of the greatest leaders of all time. In his early years he was instructed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle, who instilled in Alexander a love for learning and a solid moral foundation. Alexander was first thrust into battle at the age of sixteen when he was appointed by Phillip as the leader of Macdonia during his own campaign at Chaeroea. In the year 336, Alexander inherited his father’s throne following Phillip’s assassination. Alexander’s first conquest was to finish what his father started and attack Persia to free Greeks living under their rule in Asia. This quest was also the first of many instances where Alexander exhibited compassion as he marched down the coast of the Mediterranean only fighting in Persian cities that opposed him. In those that affirmed their allegiance to himself and Greece he left them as he found them, only installing Greek style democracies. Alexander’s superior military strategy allowed him to easily defeat Darius and Persia earning him the title Alexander the Great. Throughout his time as King of Macedonia Alexander was commended for his compassion and acceptance of those he conquered, going as far as wearing Persian dress and marrying a Persian Princess. Not only was Alexander a great military leader, he was also a person that attempted to unify people without violence, and was …show more content…
Augustus (born Gaius Octavian) was named successor to his uncle Julius Caesar following his assassination. Augustus’ was not immediately accepted as successor however, and only received his inheritance as a result of several deals with the Senate and Marc Antony who was a close associate of Caesar. Once Augustus did come into power and defeat his uncle’s killers, and his once associate Marc Antony, he was able to transform the republic of Rome. Although Augustus was distinguished on the battlefield as a result of his excellent strategy, his true claim to fame was his ability to unite the citizens of Rome. Possibly the best example of this was after gaining full power Augustus instead of becoming a dictator like his uncle, which led to his demise took the role of consul or tribune in the senate. His unofficial title however was “First Citizen” which cemented his importance while also not offending anyone. In 27 B.C.E Octavian was named Augustus by the Senate. As ruler he focused mainly on defense of Rome and internal reformation with particular interest in ridding Rome of immorality, famously exiling even his own daughter for numerous

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Thesis

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although he was advised otherwise ambitious Alexander marched to Greece and surprisingly made easy work of them. Greece quickly surrendered and promised peace (Stewart, 37). Now with the support of his people and Greece, Alexander’s next move was to fulfill his father’s goal by conquering Persia. However, prior to that he needed to control his northern borders by conquering the Thracian Triballians. The Northern enemy put up more of a fight then Greece but was still beat by King Alexander quickly(Wihelm, 40) Alexander now had Macedon’s trust and they supported him as their king completely.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His rise to power started off as a young patrician who was looking for power politically and in a military sense. Based off of his wits and connections to Crassus and Pompey or in other words the First Triumvirate he gained all of the power he needed to eventually become dictator. He was also fantastic and maintaining his power and growing his popularity amongst Romans that originally did not believe in him. He used force and brutality during wars and in his Conquest of Gaul to show he was for real to all of the people that took him lightly. He cut off people’s hands or heads if they did something incorrectly which may seem harsh but it was required to show that he was serious.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Still, the balance of power was impossible to maintain and soon began a series of civil wars that tore Rome apart, and in the end, it was Augustus who won and became Emperor of Rome in all but name. Augustus was a bright and ambitious leader, and learned much from the history of his father and to make sure not to repeat it, he gained power not only through one front but many by mollifying the senate and ruling classes by imposing laws that lessened the traditions of the roman republic and to win the people of Rome, he worked to improve over their grand city. He worked through the process of the senate rather than fighting against it like is great uncle had, so that he would he have the full support of his people. Also, unlike Caesar’s way of appointing military leaders, as senate members, Augustus appointed people who were government officials and governors to these powerful positions. Through the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Caesar was not the only man responsible for the fall and was not the man that could stop it. The cycle of event that made the empire drop was irreversible. Contemporaries of the brilliant general and politician hold as much blame as the great man himself. Caesar has a very strong character and personality, which was good to hold the Republic together as long as he lived. His assassination and the result from the continuous civil wars only made it necessary for power to be from one ruler for one great nation.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He may have done bad things and things against the way of the Roman Empire but he did it to better Rome and help make the Roman people more free. Brutus wanted to see that Rome is the best that it can be. When he killed Caesar he did it because he knew that Caesar would not be okay to step down from dictatorship and move to a more free government of the people. That is why Mark Antony refers to him as “the noblest Roman of all”. He may not have fit in with the power hungry leaders of the time, like Caesar, but he did want to make sure that the people of his country, Rome, were treated with equality and freedom.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Octavian began his political career, he was eighteen with absolutely no experience; however, by 27 B.C.E., Octavian had fledged a full “Restoration of the Republic”. The Senate even honorably changed Octavian’s name to Augustus, meaning “the illustrious one”. Augustus ruled differently than everyone before him by manipulating the political system and disguising the monarchy, thus restoring the republic. “Augustus’s system retained traditional institutions for sharing power - the Senate, the consuls, the courts - but in reality he and his successors governed like kings ruling an empire.” Although it may have been unfair to trick the Roman people, Augustus’s rule was incredibly successful and brought on peace (The Pax Romana). One could even argue that Augustus’s trickery was even necessary due to how disastrous the situation was when Caesar declared himself sole ruler of Rome.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Octavian reconstructed Rome by turning her from a Republic to an Empire, rebuilding the government system, and providing social services to Roman people who were really tired of wars. In 27 B.C.E, the Senate gave him the name of Augustus, meaning “one that is blessed by the God in rulership over Rome” to honor Octavian who everyone looked up as the son of God. So as one of the most wonderful political leaders in the Roman history, did Augustus Caesar use his ruler’s power to make Rome the greatest Empire or to make himself the greatest Emperor? Augustus has so many opportunities to expand his power and the potential to become absolute ruler of Rome but he declined them all because he put Rome first rather than himself. He knows that, after years of civil war, average Roman people just want to start new lives in peace where they can focus on life quality rather than worried about their own lives.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A great deal of respect was earned through success in battle, and was equated to a man’s ability to lead in government. Prominent figures like Pompey and Caesar were so successful because of the abilities they showed early in their careers. Augustus did not immediately establish himself as a threat during the battles against Caesar’s assassins. In fact, when he and Antony led their army against Brutus and Cassius in 42 BC, Augustus “disgraced himself in the first of the two actions by taking to his tent with illness” (Potter 172). Surely, if this weakness…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His decision to kill Caesar leads to chaos in Rome which forces him to make even more difficult decisions. The fact that Brutus holds true to his beliefs, no matter the cost makes him the tragic hero in the play. Marcus Brutus was born into a very noble family, this is the first element of a tragic hero. His ancestor Junius Brutus created the Roman Republic by fighting the Tarquin Kings. This was incredibly…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lucius Cornelius Sulla, like Marius before him, was also a renowned general involved in numerous victories for the Romans. He played a key role in the victory over King Jugurtha of the Numidians which brewed jealousy within Marius. Sulla was appointed consul in 88 and was given command of an army by the senate to lead the war against King Mithradates VI of Pontus. However, Marius was instead appointed commander with the help of the tribune Publius Sulpicius Rufus. Sulla did not accept this change and convinced his soldiers, who were steadfast in their loyalty to him, to join him in his march on Rome, which they did and Sulla succeeded in wresting control back from Marius.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays