Alexander The Great Tactics

Superior Essays
Identification and Evaluation of Sources The purpose of this investigation is to answer the question: To what extent did the military tactics and empire-building strategies of Alexander the Great influence the culture and later rulers of Europe? This source is a video about Alexander the Great from Youtube, a video sharing website, that is part of the Crash Course World History video series. It was produced by author John Green and written by historian Raoul Mayer. Since the script is written by a historian and the show is produced by a reputable author, the information presented is fairly reliable, unbiased and trustworthy. However, since the video is a secondary source, most of the information is being presented is the writer’s interpretation, …show more content…
Alexander the Great, born as Alexander III of Macedon, was a King of Macedon who was known as one of the most brilliant military generals in history. He created a vast empire stretching throughout Europe and Asia. He lived from 356-325 B.C.E., and during that short time, was able to create a nearly unstoppable military force that never lost a battle while Alexander was alive. The son of Phillip II, he was able to continue his father’s mission to make Macedon into a powerful military and economic force. (Walbank, 2016) The conquests and empire-building of Alexander the Great changed the history and culture of Europe, with his battle tactics being used by many future military leaders, as well as Hellenistic influence being spread throughout …show more content…
Alexander’s army relied heavily on lightly- armored phalanx formations with long pikes, called sarsissas, that were up to 20 feet long, special “wedge” formations to increase the volume of troops in order to be more effective in combat, and a strong cavalry that consisted of two different units, including a unit that fought with Alexander himself. After the death of his father, Alexander made the Macedonian army much larger and made it into a main focus of Macedonian culture. He also commissioned engineers to develop and create new siege weapons. All of his troops were also equipped with very light armor to help them with mobility and allowed Alexander to make adjustments to his formations easily. (Mishkov, 2015) Many European military leaders, such as Napoleon and the Roman general Pompey made use of many of these tactics in their own battles. For example, Napoleon’s main unit of troops was cavalry, just like Alexander’s, and Roman soldiers often used formations similar to that of Alexander’s Macedonian phalanxes. These military leaders respected Alexander the Great and often looked to him for inspiration in their battle planning. (Morelock, 2015) (Green, 2012) These tactics, which helped Alexander the Great create a military powerhouse, also helped later generals and leaders win

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Name: Maddie Swart Hour: 3 Alexander the Great Alexander The Great is a person that interests numerous historians. Alexander was born in Macedonia in the year 356 BCE and died in 323 BCE. Alexander wanted to conquer the world, and he started with the Middle East and Asia. Alexander led an army of about 40,000 troops across the land.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soon after his father's death, alexander took his fathers thrown and was in power and control. He used this opportunity to successfully conquer the Persian empire. he had a very powerful army, and he was known to be a genius for the military force. Alexander also succeeded to colonize the city of tyre.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander the Great brilliantly showcased his ability to strategize in the Battle of Gaugamela. The Battle of Gaugamela was an “extraordinary victory” (Matthews, “Battle of Gaugamela”) against the Persian army. Alexander’s army was composed of an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 soldiers, while his counterpart, Darius III was believed to have “anywhere between 90,000 to 250,000 men” (Wasson, “Battle of Gaugamela”). Outnumbered, Alexander knew he could not face Persian army in their traditional formation.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One thing was his determination to conquer the world and didn't give up. He took the Macedonian empire from nothing to something and started to fight. “Alexander then threw his cavalry into a circle around the entire force and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx” (Doc.B). Alexander's father King Philip made a phalanx which is when soldiers lock shields and have long spears around then to attack. Like father like son, Alexander used this tactic to defeat Porus’s army and send them running.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the background essay, it states “Alexander inherited his father's kingdom and set out with the army to conquer Persia” Consequently, Alexander took his leadership role and took action immediately to ensure success for both him and his kingdom. Leadership is undoubtedly one of the most important components in being a great leader, which is why Alexander is a great…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander had about 7,000 cavalry and 40,000 infantry at Gaugamela. Darius had about 40,000 cavalry, 1,000,000 infantry and 200 scythed chariots (Rufus). It may have seemed Darius had the advantage in this battle at first. Alexander made his camp a few miles from Darius’ (Wasson; Hickman). Alexander assembled a small scouting party to observe Darius.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was very important in Western Civilization, he conquered more land than any other king in this time. His reign as the King of Macedonia was important because he was able to lay down the foundations for the Hellenistic era. Alexander was the son of Phillip of Macedonia and king of Macedonia. His father, who had died wanted revenge on Persia and Alexander continued with his father’s plan to seek revenge against the Persians. Alexander on the other hand wanted total conquest, he had a dream of one world.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His empire expanded from Greece to northeast India. Alexander was undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful military commanders. Growing up, Alexander was tutored by a well…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A villain is a person who has done many awful things. Alexander the Great was a bad person because he was not able to lead the people in the right way. Putting your culture into life threatening positions at all time would not want people to live in that area. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy and destroyed many cultures. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assess the Legacy of Alexander the Great Alexander the Great’s legacy was the spreading of Greek (Hellenistic) culture across a large part of the Middle East and Asia, and significantly increasing the relationship between the East and West, which led to improved trade and the sharing of ideas. During his 13 years of empire expansion, Alexander the Great transformed the world. He had numerous military successes, almost conquering the entire known world at the time, and he is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. However, Alexander the Great's legacy goes much further than his military conquests; his legacy also includes founding cities, influencing the Roman Empire, and bringing the western civilisation to the rest of…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander liquidation of the Persian monarchy build opportunities fro Greek merchants, soldiers, engineers, ect, and those who obeyed him and his followers could attend in the new political unity based on the principles of the monarchy. Alexander’s followers used force to build military monarchies that controlled the Hellenistic world after his death. Autocratic energy became regular resources of those Hellenistic monarchies and was a part of Alexander’s political endowment. It’s quite evident that Alexander’s vision of an empire influenced the Roman who was the true brood of his legacy. Alexander didn’t just leave a new political view, but he also left a cultural legacy which developed the Greek language, art, architecture and literature which expanded throughout the Middle East.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays