John Rawls Code Of Justice Analysis

Improved Essays
The Constitution is designed to guard the freedom of the people by imposing law on those who maintain political power. Without this law, Americans would be under regular cruelty and threats. The US Constitution was composed with a strong picture to create a powerful nation. It states that the government comes from the people; so why do Americans have a hope of change in the Constitution? Why is reality different from what one desires from the Constitution? As a legal paper that it is it provides the law and gives people their right as well as limits the states power by providing rules and guidelines. However, the constitution itself points its attention to many of the problem in this country. That is why Philosopher John Rawls provided examples and information on what truly is unfair and what we might do to change it. …show more content…
The principles on the Constitution are very well detailed but are they well explain to Americans? Are the principles set to be fair for a group of race, religion, or for all, men and women? Rawls concerns were with distributive justice within the social good of liberty and the demands for justice as fairness. Given the demand for equality, the goods of society, and especially liberty, had to be distributed fairly. Finally, he explored the good for the political order entailed in justice as fairness. The crucial social good is self respect, and Rawls argued that justice as fairness furthers the equal distribution of the conditions necessary for this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    "It's not tyranny we desire; it's a just, limited, federal government." said Alexander Hamilton. The founders created the constitution to be a guide to our nation, and how to prevent the tyranny in the United States of America. You may wonder how did the constitution change from the articles of constitution, by spreading out the power onto not one but a lot of people. The constitution guarded against tyranny by appointing federalism and allowing the branches to check on each other so that they have balance in power.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution can be considered a very controversial topic in regards to our government. The Constitution is used to divide power between the federal government and the states. It is used also to protect the individual liberties of the American citizens. In the article The Ratification Referendum by Sanford Levinson, he discusses how the U.S constitution is flawed in many ways. He argues that Americans should have the opportunity to vote on whether congress should draft a new constitution .…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks And Balance System

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The constitution of the United States though over two centuries old laid down the foundation for the United States. Almost like a rule book for the founders to protect the right of the American peoples who shall never be denied these national rights, liberties or justice's. It is the constitution of whom 55 gentlemen took part in its creation, which acted upon the United States as a form of commandments. Filled with articles and sections, which protect us the citizens and our government. The creators prided themselves on separating the United States from any other country, and in doing so we gave birth to our rights, and liberties which we prided ourselves in years to come.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land a groundbreaking piece of human innovation and the blueprint for how our government functions on a daily basis. How could one document serve such a colossal purpose in our government? The Constitution, created and accepted by the people, is divided into six big ideas that help us to analyze how the U. S. Constitution reflects the principles of limited government, republicanism, checks and balances, federalism, separation of powers, and popular sovereignty. Each of these essential ideas is identifiable in the U. S. Constitution, and are evident in how our government functions. Ronald Reagan on said that “Man is not free unless government is limited”.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a document written many years ago, it has been interpreted in different ways, which makes it a living document. “The proper role of the Supreme Court, it is said, is to interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it” (Shaman, 2001). As a living document “We the People” attempt to use the words of the constitution to benefit us, both in a negative and positive manner. Past, present, and the future pose a disadvantage to the written constitution. Attempting to change the Constitution of the United States will take a long process and time, therefore interpreting the constitution makes it easier for the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before Rawls’s conception of justice and the difference principle, the utilitarian principle was often used in politics justifying inequalities if they made all of us better off. Rawls twist on this is that it is not enough that it should make all of us better off it must make the worst off as well off as possible. Rawls believed in justice…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitution was made to create a working government that was able to adapt to changes and organize the nation. To sell this new system of governing to a very apprehensive nation the constitution promised a bill of rights guaranteed to all Americans as well as representation in government. This forum of government wasn’t the tyranny the American people were trying to escape, this would be the foundation to unify and make great the ideas this new nation was founded on, freedom and liberty.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This actually allows more power to the people since they can elect and overthrow the government. This system made by the Founder creates a Democracy that just makes sure that no one could become power hungry and they won’t have to experience what happened with great britain. The founders didn’t know the future but they knew it was right to leave the power in the people’s hand. Also they knew that this work would be changing so that’s why no law or amendment is final it can be changed. This constitution is great for the modern text because it’s still being used now and hasn’t changed much.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, the first principle of Rawls - is essentially the principle of freedom. Basic freedoms are 1) political freedom (the principle of "equal participation" in the political process defined by the constitution), 2) the rule of law, or legal state 3) freedom of conscience. The second principle of justice of Rawls is formulated as follows that social and economic inequalities are to be settled in such a way as to lead to the greatest benefit of the least successful and that positions in society has to be open to all, with the subject of compliance with fair equal opportunity. Principles of justice Rawls relies on a strategy known in game theory as a "maximin" and implies the maximization of the minimum result. Thus, according to Rawls, the person in the original position inevitably chooses a society in which the least successful will be in the best possible position.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting the earlier Western philosophers, John Rawls is a contemporary figure who believed that rational and self-interested individuals would come to the same conclusions if they did not know their position. This was called the Veil of Ignorance, theorizing that without any knowledge of gender, race, socio-economic status or any other social position, certain rights would be agreed upon. These equal opportunities shaped his political philosophy, which became known as justice as fairness. It was theorized by Rawls that when it came to social or economic inequalities, they must benefit the least well off (Class notes). He advocated rethinking the philosophies that the nation was founded on.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A controversial question in any society is the discussion on how primary goods should be distributed. Some cultures try to distribute goods as equally as possible while others adhere to the more harsh practice of bigger dogs eat first. Distributive justice itself is the concept of how primary goods – such as income and rights – are distributed within a given society and also takes into consideration if the distribution is fair. John Rawls, a prominent political philosopher from the late 1900’s, heavily weighed in on this discussion and developed a theory based on two principles to describe, in his opinion, the fairest form of distributive justice. This form of justice, or lack thereof, is a concept engrained in our most important structures such as income, education, taxation, and various other burdens and benefits, but is it possible to have fairly distributed primary goods?…

    • 1057 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls Thought Model

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will detail the thought experiment of John Rawls known as “the original position,” the two principles of justice he believes this thought experiment results in, and, lastly, consider one objection to his claims. I argue that Rawls’ thought experiment offers a decent starting point to consider matters of justice and/or good and bad in society, but becomes compromised when we are asked to presume members behind the “veil of ignorance” do not know their conceptions of good. In A Theory of Justice, John Rawls considers the role of justice in society and posits a simple conception of just society. In Rawls’ view, justice depends upon a “scheme of cooperation” that enables all in society to achieve an agreeable existence, or the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays