My Research Project analysed where the funding for cancer research extends to, specifically focusing on, the validity of John P. Thomas’ (A specialist in Environmental Health and writer for Health Impact News) proposition involving the misappropriation of global cancer research funding. Multiple primary and secondary sources were utilised presenting Thomas’ validity. Two Primary interviews were conducted involving, John P. Thomas and Stuart Pitson (Manager of Research laboratory at the Centre of Cancer Biology). Additionally, various secondary articles such as Thomas’ The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous To Allow A Cure, and Robert Ryan’s (Bachelor of Science) Cancer Research – A Super Fraud:, as well as documentaries including Ty Bollinger’s (Cancer Researcher) The Conspiracy Behind the Suppression of Natural Cancer Treatments were correlated and cross referenced.
My outcome was presented as a written report, with the inclusion of multiple snapshots of photographic evidence (E.g. the MyWot graphing of results, expenditure calculations of the ACRF (Australian Cancer Research Foundation)) to further emphasis the published arguments. Through …show more content…
These were made available to me through the Freedom of Information Act 1982 which enabled me to gain access to specific documents including annual expenditure reports. Furtherly, investigation of these reports were made to further validate Thomas’ claims concerning the misappropriation of funding. The decision to accumulate annual financial reports was highly effective, as this increased the validity of the multiple claims outlined within my outcome, which was the basis of my topic. As I only completed two interviews, the primary quantitative data from the reports furtherly validated the propositions in my outcome, primarily in support of
My outcome was presented as a written report, with the inclusion of multiple snapshots of photographic evidence (E.g. the MyWot graphing of results, expenditure calculations of the ACRF (Australian Cancer Research Foundation)) to further emphasis the published arguments. Through …show more content…
These were made available to me through the Freedom of Information Act 1982 which enabled me to gain access to specific documents including annual expenditure reports. Furtherly, investigation of these reports were made to further validate Thomas’ claims concerning the misappropriation of funding. The decision to accumulate annual financial reports was highly effective, as this increased the validity of the multiple claims outlined within my outcome, which was the basis of my topic. As I only completed two interviews, the primary quantitative data from the reports furtherly validated the propositions in my outcome, primarily in support of