John Marshall Supreme Court Case

Improved Essays
The name of John Marshall is strongly connected with an era in federal proceedings. Since the start of his career, Marshall, a certain Federalist, entered into a confrontation with the newly elected President Thomas Jefferson, a convinced Antifederalist (Bederman). The principle of judicial review of the law constitutionality was initiated in the case Marbury vs. Madison by the chief justice. Marshall had various opportunities: to accept one or the other side as well as he could declare the court incompetent in this matter by saying that it can not interfere in government affairs, etc. By making a resolution to make no decision in the case Marbury vs. Madison, the Supreme Court affirmed its role of the final arbiter in the event of laws interpretation. The mentioned decision of the Supreme Court legalized its right to interpret the Constitution and determined the further development of American law. …show more content…
Madison, it can be noted that the Marshall’s decision was formulated and reasoned according to the principle of judicial review, that is the right to trial constitutionality of public authorities regulations. Being a Federalist, Marshall broke this principle timely, made it well-grounded and introduced it in judicial practice when the fate and prospects of the young American republic were being established. The actual significance of Marshall’s decision regarding the case Marbury vs. Madison, influenced by federalistic views of the chief justice, was the fact that the Supreme Court came to the political scene of the country. Therefore, by assigning the right to interpret any law for compliance with the Constitution, the court became an important component of not only judicial but also political system of the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    the Supreme Court decisions and the establishment of the primacy of the judiciary in determining the meaning of the Constitution. John Marshall was one of the most influential Supreme Court Chief of Justices in American history. He leaned towards Federalist views and favored a strong government, but most importantly, he established that the Judicial system held a final say whether an issue was constitutional and supported the sovereignty of federal power over state laws. In most of his cases, John…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President John Adams appointed William Marbury an office and his commission was to be present by Chief Justice James Madison; however, Madison refused to present the commission. (Ginsbert et al, 2013). Therefore, in 1803 Marbury made an appealed to the Supreme Court to have his commission honored. The following President Thomas Jefferson did not believe that the Supreme Court could intervene and that the commission should not be granted. Chief Justice John Marshall had three questions in regards…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Term Paper: John Marshall This paper will evaluate the impact of John Marshall’s jurisprudence on the shaping of the American political system, provide critiques of his jurisprudence from political contemporaries, and finally provide an opinion as to the impact his jurisprudence has contributions to American politics and political thought. Before John Marshall became the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and longest tenured chief justice in American history, John Marshall grew up in Virginia…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays